首页|期刊导航|生态学报|模拟干旱增温对高寒草原土壤理化性质及酶活的影响

模拟干旱增温对高寒草原土壤理化性质及酶活的影响OACHSSCD

Effects of stimulating drought and warming on soil physical and chemical properties,and enzyme activity in alpine grassland

中文摘要英文摘要

气候变化被认为通过直接和间接的途径对土壤环境施加压力,并最终对土壤微生物施加压力.通过不同梯度控水(20%、30%、40%、60%、100%)、加热(30-60 cm 深度加热、60-90 cm 深度加热、90-120 cm 深度加热)处理模拟干旱和增温,分析不同处理下土壤理化性质和微生物酶活的变化,旨在揭示气候变化对土壤环境和微生物的影响.研究结果发现:(1)控水处理降低了 pH、有机碳(SOC)、溶解性有机碳(DOC)、总氮(STN)、铵态氮(AN)、硝态氮(NN)、总磷(STP)、有效磷(SAP),且同一土层不同处理之间有显著性差异(P<0.05)的主要是 pH、AN、NN、SAP.增温处理在不同土层差异显著(P<0.05),在指标含量最高的0-30 cm 土层中,增温处理提高了 pH、STN、NN,降低了 SOC、DOC、AN、STP、SAP.但是在同一土层中,不同的处理差异显著(P<0.05)的只有 DOC.(2)大部分控水处理降低了微生物熵.随着控水梯度增加,β-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)活性降低,α-葡萄糖苷酶(AG)活性和 S-碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性呈先降低后增加,而氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)、亮氨酸氨基肽酶(LAP)和 S-UE 脲酶(SUE)活性在不同土层变化各异,在 0-10 cm 土层中均呈增加趋势.增温处理提高了微生物熵最高的 0-30 cm 土层中的微生物熵碳、微生物熵磷.整体上除了个别组外,增温处理降低了 AG 和 BG 酶活,提高了 30-60 cm 土层中 NAG 活性,抑制了其它土层中 NAG 酶活,增温处理促进了 0-30 cm 和 60-90 cm 土层中的 LAP 酶活,而抑制了 30-60 cm 和 90-120 cm 土层中LAP 酶活,增温处理仅降低了 SUE 在 60-90 cm 土层的酶活,在其他土层均表现出促进 SUE 酶活;增温处理仅降低了 90-120 cm土层中 ALP 酶活,而对其它土层中 ALP 酶活均表现出促进作用.(3)将土壤理化性质和酶活综合评价为土壤质量发现,控水处理降低了土壤质量指数(SQI),控水 40%组 SQI 减小最少,控水 100%SQI 降低最多.增温处理后,各土层中,临近加热组的上一土层土壤质量最高.研究还借助冗余分析探讨了土壤温湿变化对土壤理化性质和微生物的影响以及微生物对土壤环境变化的响应,为今后深入开展土壤应对气候变化的响应机制研究奠定了基础.

Climate change is believed to exert pressure on the soil environment through direct and indirect ways,and ultimately on soil microorganisms.This study simulated drought and warming conditions by applying different gradient water control treatments(20%,30%,40%,60%,100%)and heating treatments(30-60 cm,60-90 cm,and 90-120 cm).It analyzed the effects on soil environment and microorganisms,following the changes in soil physical-chemical properties and enzyme activity.Results showed that:(1)The water control treatment reduced the value of soil pH,the content of soil organic carbon(SOC),dissolved organic carbon(DOC),total nitrogen(STN),ammonium nitrogen(AN),nitrate nitrogen(NN),total phosphorus(STP),and available phosphorus(SAP).The index of soil pH,AN,NN and SAP showed significant differences(P<0.05)under the same soil layer with different treatments.All of aforementioned indexes showed significant differences(P<0.05)in heating treatments under different soil layers,especially in the 0-30cm layer compared with the other three layers(30-60 cm,60-90 cm,and 90-120 cm).However,only DOC showed significant differences(P<0.05)under different heating treatments in the same soil layer.(2)Compared to CK,most of the microbial entropy declined under the treatment of water controlling.Increasing water control gradient,except for S-UE urease(SUE),the activity of the other five microorganism's enzymes(alpha glucosidase(AG),beta-glucosidase(BG),leucine aminopeptidase(LAP),glucosaminidase(NAG),and S-alkaline phosphatase(ALP))decreased firstly,and then increased.After heating the 60-90 cm layer,the microbial entropy value of the 0-30 cm layer was larger than that of CK and was the largest.Generally speaking,except for a few groups,warming reduces the enzymatic activities of AG and BG,while in the 30-60 cm soil layer,heating increases the enzymatic activity of NAG,but in other soil layers,heating reduces the enzymatic activity of NAG.Heating increased the enzymatic activity of LAP in 0-30 cm and 60-90 cm layers,but reduced that in 30-60 cm and 90-120 cm layers.Warming only reduced the enzymatic activity of SUE in 60-90 cm layer,while promoted that in other soil layers.As for ALP,the activity was inhibited in 90-120 cm layer with warming treatment and promoted in other layers.(3)The water control treatment had deteriorated the soil quality index(SQI).The SQI of the group with 40%water control reduction decreased the least,while that of the group with 100%water control reduction decreased the most.For all warming treatment,the soil quality of the upper layer adjacent to the heating layer was the highest.This study also employed redundancy analysis to explore the effects of soil temperature and moisture changes on soil physical and chemical properties as well as on microorganisms,and the responses of microorganisms to soil environmental changes.These efforts laid the foundation for further in-depth research on the response mechanisms of soil to climate change.

孙树娇;周秉荣;李林;乔斌;石明明;苏淑兰;王秀英;曹晓云;陈奇

青海省气象科学研究所,西宁 810001||青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001||青海省气象局,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001||青海省气象局,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所,西宁 810001||青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所,西宁 810001||青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所,西宁 810001||青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所,西宁 810001||青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所,西宁 810001||青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001青海省气象科学研究所,西宁 810001||青海省气象科学研究所青海省防灾减灾重点实验室,西宁 810001

干旱增温土壤理化性质微生物熵酶活土壤质量

droughtwarmingsoil physical and chemical propertiesmicrobial entropyenzymatic activitysoil quality index

《生态学报》 2026 (8)

4259-4275,17

国家自然基金项目(U21A2021)公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201506001)青海省中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(2025ZY028)

10.20103/j.stxb.202503280718

评论