保护与重建之间:从术语Rehabilitation看西方历史环境保护认知与本土转化OACHSSCD
Between Conservation and Redevelopment:Understanding the Cognition and Localization of Western Historical Environmental Protection through the Term"Rehabilitation"
历史环境的保护需兼顾文化价值传承与现代生活需求,西方遗产保护领域的 Rehabilitation 术语作为保护与再开发之间的折衷路径,其核心内涵及本土转化规律有待厘清.通过文献挖掘与文本分析,首先辨析该术语在西方的概念内涵;其次,探讨了其在西方的形成背景与传播历程;最后,梳理其与本土术语"整治"合流的知识本土化现象,并结合当时国内官方、高校以及国际组织的一系列理论引介与实践活动,还原出知识本土化的具体路径.旨在厘清该理念的中西源流与本土化路径,明确该术语的核心内涵与形成的时代背景,为当下这一存量时代下历史环境的可持续发展提供理论支撑与实践路径参考.
The protection of historical environments,which must balance the inheritance of cultural values and modern use demands,is a core issue in the current fields of urban stock renewal and cultural heritage conservation.As a compromise approach balancing strict static conservation and demolition-redevelopment modes,the term"rehabilitation"in Western heritage conservation became a core shared concept in the field of international historical environment protection after World War II.However,its connotation origin,Sino-Western evolution context,and localization laws have not been systematically clarified in domestic academic circles.Besides,core connotation deviation is evident in many historical environmental renovation projects in China.This study systematically reviews the conceptual connotation,formation background,and dissemination process of rehabilitation in the Western context.It restores its localization process in the field of China's historical environment protection,clarifies its Sino-Western origin and localization transformation logic,and provides theoretical support for historical environmental protection in China. The study collates core European and American international charters,official norms,and academic literature,combining literature mining,participant interviews,terminology pedigree analysis,and historical context reviews.By combining associated academic works,normative texts,and conservation practices in China since the reform and opening up,it reproduces the complete route for the dissemination and transformation of the rehabilitation concept. The research results show the following.1)The core connotation of rehabilitation in the Western context can be reduced to three elements:retaining historical value,functional transformation,and adapting to modern living needs.In the heritage intervention pedigree,it lies between minimumintervention conservation and radical development,with distinct protectionism attributes and renewal adaptation functions.2)The ideological origin of this concept can be traced to Patrick Geddes'"conservative surgery"and Gustavo Giovannoni's"diradamento"theory in the early 20th century.Through local practice in the UK in the late 1950s and promotion in European countries in the 1960s and 1970s,an international consensus formed during the European Architectural Heritage Year in 1975.3)This concept has achieved connotation convergence and institutional integration with the local term"Zhengzhi(Renovation)"in China."Zhengzhi"has gone through three development stages:administrative term,connotation expansion,and terminology establishment.The localization transformation of the term was achieved through four paths:Sino-British official academic cooperation,university research and practice,Sino-Japanese international exchange and training,and establishment of a local theoretical system.The term was finally implemented by the Code of Conservation Planning for Historic Cities in 2005. This study clarifies the context for the Sino-Western evolution of the rehabilitation concept.It reveals the inherent law in the localization transformation of international heritage conservation concepts.The results provide a core theoretical reference and a practical path in historical environmental protection practice that avoids extreme tendencies and promotes sustainable activation and utilization.
王宁远;徐苏斌;青木信夫
天津大学建筑学院天津大学建筑学院天津大学建筑学院
建筑与水利
历史环境遗产保护本土化可持续发展
historical environmentheritage conservationlocalizationsustainable development
《南方建筑》 2026 (4)
1-11,11
国家社科基金重大项目(25&ZD116):城市文化遗产保护与活化利用的协同机制研究中国文化遗产研究院开放课题(2025KF03):近(现)代文物建筑保护利用工作现状研究.
评论