首页|期刊导航|南都学坛|朝鲜对中国典籍的辩诬及清朝之回应

朝鲜对中国典籍的辩诬及清朝之回应OACHSSCD

Korea's Protestation and Refutation of Chinese Classics and the Qing Dynasty's Response

中文摘要英文摘要

郑元庆的《廿一史约编》是康熙年间纂修而成的,起初是为教育孩童而作,此书流传到朝鲜,引发了一次朝鲜有关宗系源流问题的辩诬,最终清官方认为朝鲜宗系源流问题已经在《明史》中予以认可,而此书于康熙年间纂修,且久不盛行,不必修改.事实上,朝鲜对宗系源流问题的辩诬由来已久,在清代也经历了三次大的辩诬过程,都是被以私家所撰修的史籍为借口,进而希望清朝在官方给予明确的回应,朝鲜使臣也都得到了满意的答复.朝鲜对宗系源流问题的辩诬,表面上意在纠正史籍记载的谬误之处,实质上则是与清朝的政治博弈.

Summary of the Twenty-One Histories by Zheng Yuanqing,compiled during the Kangxi reign of the Qing Dynasty,was initially created for children's education.Upon its spread to Joseon(Korea),the book sparked a dispute in Korea over its interpretation of the royal ancestral lineage.In response,the Qing government eventually determined that the issue of Joseon's ancestral lineage had already been recognized in The History of the Ming Dynasty and that,since Zheng's work was compiled during the Kangxi period and had not been widely circulated,there was no need for revision.In fact,Korea's protestation and refutation of its ancestral lineage was longstanding.During the Qing Dynasty,it underwent three major protestation and refutation campaigns,all taking privately compiled historical books as a pretext to demand an official clarification from the Qing court.The Joseon envoys received satisfactory replies each time.While Korea's protestation and refutation appeared to focus on correcting perceived errors in historical records,it was,in reality,a form of political maneuvering in its relations with the Qing Dynasty.

孔永红

南阳师范学院 期刊部,河南 南阳 473061

社会科学

清朝典籍朝鲜辩诬

Qing Dynastyhistorical textsJoseon(Korea)protestation and refutation

《南都学坛》 2026 (3)

37-45,9

河南省哲学社会科学规划项目"清代史学传播与普及的历程与经验研究"(2017CLS020).

评论