首页|期刊导航|矿业科学学报|地面煤仓二氧化碳爆破技术及应用

地面煤仓二氧化碳爆破技术及应用OA

Carbon dioxide blasting method and its application for surface coal bunkers

中文摘要英文摘要

针对陕西省榆林市某煤矿地面煤仓堵塞影响生产,且其堵塞以黏壁、结拱为主,提出采用二氧化碳爆破疏通技术解决此问题.通过受力分析发现,黏壁煤体上部及结拱中心的黏滞摩擦力小,是疏通的关键位置.由对比可知:在处理黏壁堵塞时,空气炮疏通使用设备平均数量约为二氧化碳爆破疏通的 3.3 倍、落煤量平均值少 0.97 t,表明设备的泄能压力对地面煤仓的疏通效果影响较小;在处理结拱堵塞时,空气炮疏通使用设备平均数量约为二氧化碳爆破疏通的 3.0 倍、落煤量平均值少5.83 t.研究结果表明:二氧化碳爆破器疏通优于空气炮疏通,且疏通时应将二氧化碳爆破器的泄能头尽量贴近拱桥的中心,更有利于疏通.二氧化碳爆破疏通技术适用于地面煤仓疏通,并为煤矿地面煤仓疏通开辟了新技术路径.

Ground coal bunker blockage hinders production at a coal mine in Yulin City,Shaanxi Prov-ince,with wall adhesion and arching as two main types of blockage.This study proposes a carbon diox-ide(CO2)blasting method as a solution to this problem.Force analysis revealed that the upper part of the adhesive coal mass and the center of the arch feature lower viscous friction,thus becoming key po-sitions for unblocking.Comparative analysis showed that in dealing with wall adhesion blockage,the average number of air cannons required for unblocking was approximately 3.3 times that of the carbon dioxide blasting method.Coal drop was 0.97 t less,indicating the limited effect of the equipment's en-ergy release pressure on unblocking.For arching blockage,air cannon usage was 3.0 times higher,with 5.83 t less coal drop than CO2 blasting.This demonstrates that CO2 blasting outperforms air can-nons.The energy dissipation head of CO2 device should be as close as possible to the center of the arch bridge during unblocking.This CO2 blasting method proves to be a feasible technical approach for un-blocking ground coal bunkers.

倪昊;杨仁树;丁晨曦;李奇贤;揣晓升

煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司,北京 100013北京科技大学资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083北京科技大学资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司,北京 100013煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司,北京 100013

矿业与冶金

二氧化碳爆破疏通煤仓堵塞空气炮结拱

carbon dioxideunblockingcoal bunker blockageair cannonarching

《矿业科学学报》 2026 (2)

310-316,7

国家自然科学基金(51934001)

10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2025110

评论