架空游览车车体强度及疲劳计算分析OA
Car Body Strength and Fatigue Calculation of Overhead Sightseeing Vehicle
为分析某架空游览车车体结构设计是否满足使用要求,建立该游览车车体结构的有限元模型并对其静强度及关键焊缝疲劳强度进行计算分析,采用标准GB 8408-2018静强度以及EN 1999-1-9疲劳强度进行校核.静强度所有工况中,车体底架最大应力发生在S1工况底架横梁减重孔处,其安全系数为3.7;车身最大应力发生在工况S4门立柱处,其安全系数为4.07;均大于标准要求的许用安全系数3.5,满足使用要求.疲劳工况中,车体底架与转向架连接的弯梁I级焊缝处应力最大,15.74 MPa,小于EN 1999-1-9标准要求的疲劳寿命23 MPa,满足其无限寿命设计要求.经校核,该架空游览车车体结构设计满足使用要求.
To analyze whether the body structure design of overhead sightseeing vehicle meets the usage requirements,finite element model of car body structure is established,and the static strength and fatigue strength of key welds are calculated and analyzed,standard GB 8408-2018 static strength and EN 1999-1-9 fatigue strength are adopted in verification.Among all the load cases of static strength,the maximum stress of the underframe of the vehicle body occurs at the weight reduction hole of the underframe crossbeam in the S1 load case,and its safety factor is 3.7.The maximum stress of the vehicle body occurs in the S4 load case at the door pillar,and its safety factor is 4.07.Both are greater than the allowable safety factor of 3.5 as required by the standard GB 8408-2018.Under fatigue conditions,the stress at the grade I weld of the curved beam connecting the vehicle body underframe and the bogie is the maximum,15.74 MPa,which is less than the fatigue life of 23 MPa in standard EN 1999-1-9 and meets the design requirement of its infinite life.It is verified that the body structure design of this sightseeing vehicle meets the usage requirements.
周丽莎;蔡仲恒;张永亮;向俊龙
上海轨道交通检测认证(集团)有限公司,上海 201800中车重庆智慧轨道交通技术有限公司,重庆 401122中铁宝桥集团有限公司,陕西 宝鸡 721000中铁合肥新型交通产业投资有限公司,合肥 231600
轻工纺织
架空游览车静强度疲劳强度
sightseeing vehiclestatic strengthfatigue strength
《机电工程技术》 2026 (7)
184-187,4
评论