ALI对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者PCI术后院内主要不良心血管事件的预测价值OA
Predictive value of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events following PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
目的 探讨晚期肺癌炎症指数(ALI)对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后住院期间主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)的预测价值.方法 回顾性收集2016年11月至2022年3月于联勤保障部队第904医院心内科接受急诊PCI治疗的681例STEMI患者的临床资料,包括一般资料、实验室指标及影像学参数,并计算ALI、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)及全身免疫炎症指数(SII).根据住院期间是否发生MACEs,将患者分为MACEs组(n=241)与非MACEs组(n=440).比较两组患者的临床特征.采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估ALI对院内MACEs的预测效能,并与NLR、PLR、SII进行比较;采用Spearman秩相关分析ALI与Gensini评分的相关性;采用单因素和多因素logistic逐步回归分析筛选院内MACEs的独立影响因素;基于独立影响因素构建列线图预测模型,采用Bootstrap法(重抽样1000次)进行内部验证,并采用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验、校准曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)及ROC曲线评估列线图预测模型的区分度和精准度.结果 MACEs组患者的ALI指数明显低于非MACEs组(P<0.05).ROC曲线分析显示,术前ALI预测院内MACEs的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.675(95%CI 0.638~0.710),ALI的最佳临界值为188.07,敏感度为58.51%,特异度为79.55%,预测效能优于NLR、PLR和SII(P<0.01).相关性分析显示,ALI指数与Gensini评分呈负相关(r=-0.149,P<0.001).单因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄、糖尿病、Killip分级≥Ⅱ级、C反应蛋白、肌钙蛋白Ⅰ、肌红蛋白、左主干支病变、左前降支病变、左回旋支病变、右冠状动脉病变、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、Gensini评分、ALI>188.07、白细胞计数和血管病变数量≥2均为院内MACEs的影响因素(P<0.05);多因素logistic逐步回归分析显示,年龄(OR=1.042,95%CI 1.023~1.062,P<0.001)、入院时Killip分级≥Ⅱ级(OR=11.023,95%CI 6.738~18.032,P<0.001)、Gensini评分(OR=1.012,95%CI 1.003~1.020,P=0.006)为STEMI患者PCI术后住院期间发生MACEs的独立危险因素,而LVEF(OR=0.895,95%CI 0.859~0.933,P<0.001)和术前ALI指数(>188.07)(OR=0.249,95%CI 0.156~0.397,P<0.001)为独立保护因素.基于多因素logistic回归分析结果构建的列线图预测模型纳入年龄、Killip分级、LVEF、Gensini评分及ALI指数,内部验证显示一致性指数(CI)为0.892,模型的AUC为0.895(95%CI 0.867~0.923),敏感度为79.7%,特异度为87.5%,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示模型拟合良好(χ²=8.02,P=0.43).结论 术前ALI指数是STEMI患者PCI术后院内MACEs的独立保护因素;联合年龄、Killip分级、LVEF、Gensini评分及ALI构建的列线图模型对院内MACEs具有良好的预测效能.
Objective To investigate the predictive value of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index(ALI)for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs)following percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).Methods Clinical data of 681 STEMI patients who underwent emergency PCI at the Department of Cardiology,the 904th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA from November 2016 to March 2022 were retrospectively collected,including general information,laboratory indicators,and imaging parameters.ALI,neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR),and systemic immune-inflammation index(SII)were calculated.Patients were divided into MACEs group(n=241)and non-MACEs group(n=440)based on the occurrence of in-hospital MACEs.Clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive performance of ALI for in-hospital MACEs,and then to compare it with those of NLR,PLR,and SII.Spearman rank correlation was employed to analyze the correlation between ALI and the Gensini score.Univariate and multivariate logistic stepwise regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors influencing in-hospital MACEs.A nomogram prediction model was constructed based on the independent factors and internally validated using the Bootstrap method(1000 resamples).The model's discrimination and calibration were assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test,calibration curve,decision curve analysis(DCA),and ROC curve.Results The ALI index was significantly lower in MACEs group than in non-MACEs group(P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC)of preoperative ALI for predicting in-hospital MACEs was 0.675(95%CI 0.638-0.710),with an optimal cut-off value of 188.07,sensitivity of 58.51%,and specificity of 79.55%.The predictive performance of ALI was superior to that of NLR,PLR,and SII(P<0.01).Correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between the ALI index and the Gensini score(r=-0.149,P<0.001).Univariate logistic analysis identified age,diabetes,Killip class≥Ⅱ,C-reactive protein,troponin Ⅰ,myoglobin,left main coronary artery lesion,left anterior descending artery lesion,left circumflex artery lesion,right coronary artery lesion,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),Gensini score,ALI>188.07,white blood cell count,and number of vascular lesions≥2 as influencing factors for in-hospital MACEs(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that age(OR=1.042,95%CI 1.023-1.062,P<0.001),Killip class≥Ⅱ on admission(OR=11.023,95%CI 6.738-18.032,P<0.001),and Gensini score(OR=1.012,95%CI 1.003-1.020,P=0.006)were independent risk factors for in-hospital MACEs,while LVEF(OR=0.895,95%CI 0.859-0.933,P<0.001)and preoperative high ALI index(>188.07)(OR=0.249,95%CI 0.156-0.397,P<0.001)were independent protective factors.The nomogram prediction model,incorporating age,Killip class,LVEF,Gensini score,and ALI index,showed a consistency index(C-index)of 0.892 upon internal validation.The model's AUC was 0.895(95%CI 0.867-0.923),with a sensitivity of 79.7%and specificity of 87.5%.The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good model fit(χ²=8.02,P=0.43).Conclusions Preoperative ALI index is an independent protective factor for in-hospital MACEs in STEMI patients after PCI.The nomogram model combining age,Killip class,LVEF,Gensini score,and ALI index demonstrates good predictive performance for in-hospital MACEs.
徐东霞;李一萌;苑日康;叶江平;宗刚军
安徽医科大学无锡临床学院心内科,江苏 无锡 214044||安徽医科大学第五临床医学院,安徽 合肥 230032江南大学无锡临床学院心内科,江苏 无锡 214122安徽医科大学无锡临床学院心内科,江苏 无锡 214044||安徽医科大学第五临床医学院,安徽 合肥 230032安徽医科大学无锡临床学院心内科,江苏 无锡 214044||安徽医科大学第五临床医学院,安徽 合肥 230032解放军联勤保障部队第904医院心血管内科,江苏 无锡 214044
医药卫生
晚期肺癌炎症指数ST段抬高型心肌梗死主要不良心血管事件经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
advanced lung cancer inflammation indexST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionmajor adverse cardiovascular eventspercutaneous coronary intervention
《解放军医学杂志》 2026 (3)
392-401,10
评论