基于人工智能的卫星试验鉴定一体化试验设计OA
Integrated Experimental Design for Satellite Test and Authentication Based on Artificial Intelligence
针对传统线性试验流程及批产导向的鉴定范式存在应用试验后移、极限考核不充分等问题,文章提出基于人工智能的卫星一体化试验设计(AI-ITD)框架,通过指标体系设计—关键指标分类评价—AI驱动多应力试验的完整流程,采用高斯过程回归(GPR)等 AI模型构建多应力与性能指标的映射关系,结合试验点三因素分步筛选算法动态逼近极限包络.以某卫星星上目标定位精度为核心指标开展验证.结果表明:该方法仅需约80个试验点即可使极限包络预测正确率稳定在90%以上,显著优于传统正交试验,实现了极小试验代价下卫星服役条件的摸边探底,AI-ITD框架可以为航天装备质量能力提升提供参考.
In response to the problems of the delayed application testing and inadequate extreme condition assessment in the traditional linear test process and the batch production-oriented ap-praisal paradigm,an artificial intelligence-based satellites integrated test design(AI-ITD)frame-work is proposed in this paper.Through a complete process of index system design-classified evaluation of key indices-AI-driven multi-stress testing,artificial intelligence models including Gaussian process regression(GPR)are adopted to construct the mapping relationship between multi-stress factors and performance indices,and a three-factor step-by-step screening algorithm on test point is integrated to dynamically approach the extreme envelope.A case validation is car-ried out with the on-board target positioning accuracy on a certain satellite as the core index.The results show that this method can stabilize the prediction accuracy of the extreme envelope at over 90%with only about 80 test points,which is significantly superior to the traditional orthogonal test,thus achieving the exploration of the satellite's service condition limits with minimal test cost,and the AI-ITD framework can provide a reference for improving the quality and capability of aerospace equipment.
郭振伟;何贝琛;黄首清;杨浩哲;王梦园;马楷镔
中国空间技术研究院,北京 100094北京卫星环境工程研究所 可靠性与环境工程技术国防科技重点实验室,北京 100094||北京航空航天大学 可靠性与系统工程学院,北京 100191北京卫星环境工程研究所 可靠性与环境工程技术国防科技重点实验室,北京 100094北京空间科技信息研究所,北京 100094航天东方红卫星有限公司,北京 100094北京卫星环境工程研究所 可靠性与环境工程技术国防科技重点实验室,北京 100094
航空航天
人工智能一体化试验设计卫星试验鉴定序贯试验高斯过程回归
artificial intelligenceintegrated experimental designsatellite test and authenticationsequential testGPR
《航天器工程》 2026 (2)
128-137,10
评论