预防性环境行政公益诉讼的法理阐释与优化路径OACHSSCD
Jurisprudential Interpretation and Optimization Path of Preventive Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation
预防性环境行政公益诉讼有助于监控和预防环境风险,实现对环境公共利益的全方位保护.从法理层面分析,预防性环境行政公益诉讼既是多元利益关系平衡协调的制度支撑,也是风险预防理念与事后救济机制相结合的结果,且是适应性环境治理理念的具体彰显.但是,当前预防性环境行政公益诉讼制度在构建过程中仍存在明显不足,如诉前程序尚未充分激活,诉讼启动条件不明,在证明环节上存在举证责任规则不清晰、待证事实范围未明确以及证明标准不统一等问题.为完善该诉讼制度,应采取的优化路径是充分激活诉前程序,明晰诉讼启动条件,破解预防性环境行政公益诉讼的证明难题.
Preventive environmental administrative public interest litigation helps monitor and prevent en-vironmental risks,achieving comprehensive protection of environmental public interests.From a jurispru-dential perspective,it serves as an institutional support for balancing and coordinating diverse interests,represents the integration of the risk prevention concept with ex-post relief mechanisms,and embodies the philosophy of adaptive environmental governance,but there are still significant deficiencies in the construction process of the current litigation system,such as the insufficient activation of pre-litigation procedures,unclear conditions for initiating lawsuits,and unresolved issues within the proof process—ambiguous rules for burden of proof,an undefined scope of facts to be proven,and inconsistent standards of proof,etc..To enhance this litigation system,optimization path should focus on fully activating pre-litigation procedures,clarifying the conditions for initiating lawsuits,and solving the problem of proving preventive environmental administrative public interest litigation.
曹奕阳;刘芷若;沈红波
华中师范大学法学院 湖北 武汉 430079湖北省地方立法研究和人才培养基地(华中师范大学)湖北省人民检察院第五检察部
社会科学
预防性公益诉讼行政公益诉讼风险预防检察机关
preventive public interest litigationadministrative public interest litigationrisk preventionprocuratorial organs
《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2026 (2)
67-76,10
湖北省人民检察院检察理论与应用研究课题"生态环境和资源检察保护问题研究"(HJ2024B26)中央高校基本科研业务费资助"人民法院案例库建设与应用研究"(CCNU26ZZ059).
评论