不同降雨情景下LID雨洪调控措施效果模拟评估OA
Simulation and evaluation of low-impact development stormwater control under varying rainfall scenarios
[目的]研究不同降雨情景对低影响开发(LID)设施雨洪控制效果的影响.[方法]基于 SWMM 模型,以广州大坑河流域为研究区域,采用芝加哥雨型,布设下沉式绿地、雨水花园、绿色屋顶、透水铺装 4种 LID 设施,对比 1、2、5、10、20、50 a 共 6种重现期下相同改造面积不同设施的径流控制效能.[结果]①随着重现期增大,不同方案对径流的控制效果总体呈衰减趋势,LID 设施对高重现期降雨的缓冲能力有限;②各方案径流控制效果表现为雨水花园≈透水铺装>LID2>LID1>下沉式绿地>绿色屋顶,雨水花园与透水铺装径流总量削减能力突出,组合方案在优化径流时间分布上更具优势;③雨峰提前会加剧径流"快涨慢消"特征,增加洪峰控制难度,削弱雨洪控制效果.[结论]降雨重现期与雨峰特征显著影响 LID 设施的雨洪控制效能,其中雨水花园与透水铺装对径流总量的削减效果突出,组合方案在优化径流时间分布方面优势显著.
[Objective]With rapid urbanization increasing stormwater runoff and flood risk,low impact development(LID)measures have become an effective approach for urban stormwater management.This paper investigates the impact of various rainfall scenarios on the stormwater control efficiency of LID facilities.[Method]The study was based on the storm water management model(SWMM)and the Chicago storm hyetograph.Taking the Dakeng River Basin in Guangzhou as the study area,we investigated and compared the efficiency of four types of LID facilities:sunken green spaces,rain gardens,green roofs,and permeable pavements,in controlling runoff for the same renovation area under six return periods:1,2,5,10,20 and 50 years.[Result]①As the return period increases,the overall control efficiency of all LID types decreased,suggesting the limited buffering capacity of LID facilities against extreme rainfall events.②The control efficiency of the LID types was ranked as follows:rain garden ≈ permeable pavement>LID2>LID1>sunken green space>green roof.Rain gardens and permeable pavements were most effective in reducing total runoff,while the combined schemes excelled in optimizing the temporal distribution of runoff.③Earlier rainfall peaks amplified the rapid rise and slow recession of runoff,increasing the difficulty of peak flow control and reducing the overall stormwater control efficiency.[Conclusion]Both rainfall return period and peak characteristics significantly influenced the stormwater control efficiency of LID facilities.Among the 6 types of LID facilities we compared,rain gardens and permeable pavements were most effective in reducing total runoff,whereas the combined schemes were superior in optimizing temporal runoff distribution.These findings provide valuable guidance for the design and optimization of urban stormwater management systems.
韦骏成;葛阳;位帅;康政;付铁文;刘智勇
中山大学 土木工程学院水资源与环境研究中心,广州 510275中山大学 土木工程学院水资源与环境研究中心,广州 510275中山大学 土木工程学院水资源与环境研究中心,广州 510275||中山市供水事务中心,广东 中山 528400中山大学 土木工程学院水资源与环境研究中心,广州 510275||珠海市水务局,广东 珠海 519000中山大学 土木工程学院水资源与环境研究中心,广州 510275中山大学 土木工程学院水资源与环境研究中心,广州 510275
农业科技
SWMM模型低影响开发雨洪控制效果雨峰系数
SWMM modellow impact developmentstormwater control efficiencyrainfall peak coefficient
《灌溉排水学报》 2026 (4)
98-107,10
国家自然科学基金项目(52179031)广东省杰出青年基金项目(2023B1515020116)珠江人才计划团队项目(2019ZT08G090)中国电力建设集团重点科技研发项目(DJ-ZDXM-2023-39)
评论