首页|期刊导航|重庆医学|口腔生物膜与自体筛骨垂直板修补鼻中隔穿孔的疗效及安全性对比

口腔生物膜与自体筛骨垂直板修补鼻中隔穿孔的疗效及安全性对比OA

Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral biofilm and autologous perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone graft in repairing nasal septal perforation

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 对比口腔生物膜与自体筛骨垂直板修补鼻中隔穿孔的疗效及安全性.方法 前瞻性选取2023年4月至2025年8月该院收治的136例鼻中隔穿孔患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组68例.所有患者接受鼻内镜下鼻中隔穿孔修补术,对照组采用自体筛骨垂直板修补方案,观察组采用口腔生物膜修补方案.比较两组临床疗效、手术效果与恢复参数(术中出血量、手术时间、损伤黏膜范围、术后1周愈合面积及术后愈合时间)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、鼻塞症状评估量表(NOSE)评分、鼻腔通气功能(鼻阻力、鼻腔总容积及鼻腔最小截面积)及术后并发症发生情况.结果 观察组疗效优于对照组(P<0.05).两组术中出血量、手术时间、损伤黏膜范围、术后1周愈合面积及术后愈合时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后1个月及术后3个月,两组 VAS及NOSE评分较术前1周均有所下降(P<0.05),且观察组较对照组下降更明显(P<0.05).与术前1周比较,术后3个月两组鼻阻力下降(P<0.05),鼻腔总容积及鼻腔最小截面积增加(P<0.05),且观察组较对照组变化更明显(P<0.05).两组术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在鼻中隔穿孔修补术中,口腔生物膜较自体筛骨垂直板临床疗效更好,手术相关参数表现更佳,术后疼痛与鼻腔通气功能改善更明显,且安全性相当.

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral biofilm combined with autologous vertical plate of the ethmoid bone for repairing nasal septal perforation.Methods A prospective selection of 136 hospitalized patients with nasal septal perforation admitted to the hospital from April 2023 to August 2025 was conducted as the study subjects.They were divided into an observation group and a control group ac-cording to a random number table method,with 68 cases in each group.All patients underwent endoscopic na-sal septal perforation repair.The control group received an autologous perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone repair protocol,while the observation group received an oral biomembrane repair protocol.The differences be-tween the two groups were compared in terms of clinical efficacy,surgical outcomes and recovery parameters(intraoperative blood loss,operation time,range of mucosal injury,healing area at 1 week postoperatively,and postoperative healing time),Visual Analog Scale(VAS)scores,Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation(NOSE)scale scores,nasal ventilation function(nasal resistance,total nasal volume,and nasal minimum cross-sectional area),and the incidence of postoperative complications.Results The observation group dem-onstrated superior efficacy compared to the control group(P<0.05).Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss,operation time,extent of mucosal injury,healing area at 1 week postoperatively,and healing time(P<0.05).At 1 month and 3 months postoperatively,the VAS and NOSE scores in both groups decreased compared to those at 1 week preoperatively(P<0.05),with a more pronounced decrease in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).Compared with 1 week preoperatively,nasal resistance decreased at 3 months postoperatively in both groups(P<0.05),while total nasal volume and minimum cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity increased(P<0.05),and these chan-ges were more significant in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).No statistically sig-nificant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion In the repair of nasal septal perforation,the oral biofilm repair protocol demonstrates su-perior clinical efficacy compared to the autologous ethmoid perpendicular plate repair protocol.It exhibits bet-ter performance in surgical parameters,more significant improvement in postoperative pain and nasal ventila-tion function,and equivalent safety.

伍君;郑跃彬;易旺;王茜;钟华才

自贡市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,四川 自贡 643000自贡市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,四川 自贡 643000自贡市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,四川 自贡 643000自贡市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,四川 自贡 643000自贡市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,四川 自贡 643000

医药卫生

鼻中隔穿孔口腔生物膜筛骨垂直板疗效安全性

nasal septal perforationoral biofilmperpendicular plate of ethmoid boneefficacysafety

《重庆医学》 2026 (4)

842-846,852,6

自贡市卫生健康委员会科研课题(22yb053).

10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2026.04.020

评论