首页|期刊导航|重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版)|数字资产继承的利益诉求与流转规则

数字资产继承的利益诉求与流转规则OA

On Claims of Inheritance Interests and Their Circulation Rules for Digital Assets

中文摘要英文摘要

数字资产继承纠纷暴露了《民法典》条款过于抽象、适用标准模糊等局限.学界针对法律属性(以复合型财产说为主流)与可继承性(人身属性与财产性二元之争)的分歧尚未消除,亟需通过司法解释构建"原则与例外"的体系框架.在继承前提方面,需要破除"人格性数字资产绝对不可继承"的传统观念,同时依据《民法典》第496条对平台限制性条款作"相对无效"认定,为数字资产继承创造制度空间.在继承逻辑方面,应当构建动态平衡机制,通过协调被继承人与继承人之间的利益诉求以及网络服务提供者的风险与效益诉求,既减少资产闲置浪费,又保障各方合法权益.在继承规则方面,应当依法解释《民法典》第1122条,确立"一般可继承、特殊受限"原则,在保障继承人基本处置权的同时,针对涉及公共利益等特殊情形创设"限制性继承"规则.

Disputes over the inheritance of digital assets have exposed the limitations of the Civil Code in terms of abstract provisions and vague application standards.The academic community has not yet resolved the discrepancies between legal attributes(the mainstream of composite property)and inheritability(the dualistic dispute between personal attributes and property),and there is an urgent need to build a systematic framework of"principles and exceptions"through judicial interpretation.On the premise of inheritance,it is necessary to break the traditional concept that"personalized digital assets are absolutely not inheritable",and at the same time,according to Article 496 of the Civil Code,the platform restrictive provisions of the interpretation of the"relative invalidity"of the platform,to create institutional space for the inheritance of digital assets.In terms of inheritance logic,a dynamic balancing mechanism should be constructed to reduce the waste of idle assets and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of all parties by coordinating the adverse interests of the decedent and the heir as well as the risky-based benefits and counterclaims of the network service provider.In terms of inheritance rules,Article 1122 of the Civil Code should be interpreted in a standardized manner,establishing the principle of being"inheritable generally but restrictive in special situations",and creating"restrictive inheritance"rules for special situations involving public interests while safeguarding the basic disposal rights of heirs.

曹贤信;周凯林

赣南师范大学法律系,江西 赣州 341000赣南师范大学法律系,江西 赣州 341000

社会科学

数字资产对向性利益诉求风险性效益反诉求网络服务提供者

digital assetsadverse benefit claimsrisky-based benefit counterclaimsnetwork service providers

《重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (2)

47-60,14

江西省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目"去算法歧视的法理基础与规范展开研究"(FX22107)江西省研究生创新专项资金项目"数字资产继承的利益诉求与流转机制"(YC2024-S809).

10.19406/j.issn.2097-4523.2026.02.004

评论