首页|期刊导航|表面技术|316不锈钢的超细微粒及复合强化喷丸研究

316不锈钢的超细微粒及复合强化喷丸研究OA

Ultrafine Particle and Composite Strengthening Shot Peening of 316 Stainless Steel

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探索超细微粒对 316 不锈钢的表面改性效果,优化其表面质量以适配高精度医疗器械、新能源汽车制造等领域需求.方法 选取80 μm和 10 μm直径丸料,分别实施单一喷丸与复合喷丸(先 80 μm后10 μm)处理,设置0.2 MPa和0.4 MPa输出压力,最后对样品进行 300℃+30 min回火处理.通过表面形貌观察、微观结构分析、电化学极化曲线测试、残余应力检测及显微硬度表征,并结合透射电镜观察回火热处理前后位错组织演变,系统评估工艺对材料性能的影响.结果 复合强化试样表面最大残余压应力达‒993 MPa;超细微粒喷丸弹坑小,表面粗糙度低至 1.03 μm;喷丸后表层形成明显晶粒细化与位错缠结,热处理后超细喷丸样品应力松弛现象突出.结论 超细微粒喷丸可获最佳表面粗糙度和耐腐蚀性能,复合喷丸在残余压应力与显微硬度上表现最优,材料综合性能显著提升.

This study systematically investigates the effects of ultrafine particle shot peening(UFSP)and composite shot peening(CSP)on the surface integrity,mechanical properties,and corrosion resistance of 316 stainless steel,so as to address the significant research gap in the application of sub-10 µm particles and multi-step peening sequences.The originality of this work lies in the direct comparison of single peening using 80 µm(micro)and 10 µm(ultrafine)particles with a novel composite process(80 µm followed by 10 µm),under controlled pressures(0.2 MPa and 0.4 MPa),coupled with a post-peening tempering treatment(300℃for 30 min)to assess thermal stability.The experimental methodology involves preparing 15 mm3 specimens from commercial 316 stainless steel under six distinct peening conditions:Micro-0.2,Micro-0.4,Ultrafine-0.2,Ultrafine-0.4,Composite-0.2,and Composite-0.4.A comprehensive characterization suite is employed:surface morphology and roughness(Ra)via profilometry,microstructure analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy(SEM)and Transmission Electron Microscopy(TEM),surface residual stress via X-ray diffraction(XRD),microhardness profiling from the surface to the interior,and electrochemical polarization curves to evaluate corrosion behavior.Crucially,TEM is used to analyze dislocation structures before and after tempering.Key findings reveal distinct advantages for each process.UFSP produces the superior surface finish,with the lowest average roughness(Ra=1.03-1.06 µm),attributable to the fine,shallow,and densely distributed craters observed by SEM.This results in the best corrosion performance,evidenced by the highest corrosion potential and lowest current density in polarization tests,as the minimal impact energy preserves the protective passive film.However,UFSP induces a relatively shallow hardening layer(30 µm depth,max hardness 300HV)and exhibits the most significant stress relaxation after tempering(residual stress reduction>50%),indicating lower microstructural stability.Conversely,the novel CSP strategy yields the most favorable combination of properties.It achieves a high surface residual compressive stress of ‒993 MPa and the highest surface microhardness,nearly doubling the base material's hardness to 500HV,with a substantial hardening depth of 70 µm.SEM images confirm that the secondary UFSP step partially smoothes the craters formed by the initial micro-peening,resulting in a surface roughness intermediate between the two single-step processes.Notably,CSP samples demonstrate superior resistance to stress relaxation during tempering compared with UFSP,suggesting a more stable deformed layer.TEM analysis of the subsurface(15 µm depth)reveals high-density dislocation tangles and strain-induced martensite formation,particularly prominent in Micro and CSP samples.The CSP process facilitates the formation of a gradient nanostructured layer,enhancing mechanical stability.The study establishes that output pressure positively influences residual stress and hardness,with 0.4 MPa conditions generally outperforming 0.2 MPa.The significant stress relaxation in UFSP samples upon tempering is linked to the lower stability of its dislocation structures and finer deformation layer.In conclusion,this research demonstrates that UFSP is optimal for applications demanding exceptional surface smoothness and corrosion resistance.In contrast,the innovative CSP process offers a superior solution for components requiring a synergistic combination of high compressive residual stress,significant surface hardening,considerable hardening depth,improved surface finish compared with conventional peening,and enhanced thermal stability.These findings provide critical insights for selecting and optimizing peening parameters for 316 stainless steel in high-precision fields such as medical devices and aerospace components.

栗克建;曾金;张群;任建兵;葛一波

重庆科技大学 冶金与动力工程学院,重庆 401331重庆科技大学 冶金与动力工程学院,重庆 401331重庆优钛实业有限公司,重庆 408400重庆科技大学 冶金与动力工程学院,重庆 401331||重庆力为康智能装备有限公司,重庆 332000上海恩太机械设备有限公司,上海 201800

矿业与冶金

喷丸超细微粒316不锈钢表面强化应力松弛

shot peeningultrafine particles316 stainless steelsurface strengtheningstress relaxation

《表面技术》 2026 (7)

124-132,9

重庆市总工会2022年创新项目 2022 Innovation Project of Chongqing Federation of Trade Unions

10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.07.010

评论