首页|期刊导航|中国渔业经济|WTO《渔业补贴协定》背景下IUU捕捞认定的国内立法比较研究

WTO《渔业补贴协定》背景下IUU捕捞认定的国内立法比较研究OA

A comparative study of domestic legislation on IUU fishing recognition under the background of the WTO's Fisheries Subsidies Agreement

中文摘要英文摘要

世界贸易组织于2022年通过的《渔业补贴协定》(AFS)引入了对"非法、未报告和无管制捕捞"(以下简称"IUU捕捞")补贴的禁令,同时以脚注的形式援引了联合国粮农组织《预防、阻止和消除非法、未报告和无管制捕捞的国际行动计划》对IUU捕捞的定义.在缺乏国际条约明确定义IUU捕捞的情况下,缔约方国内立法需确保认定规则与《协定》保持一致,这是确保禁令得以有效、公平执行的基础.本文比较了10个主要渔业和补贴方的国内法律中关于IUU捕捞定义和认定程序的规定,以评估其执行禁令的能力.研究发现,关于IUU捕捞的定义,欧盟和泰国直接采用了与《协定》脚注相同的定义,韩国、美国、中国、智利、墨西哥、挪威和日本的国内法对IUU捕捞定义在内容上与《协定》脚注基本相同,印度国内法所规定IUU捕捞的范围则明显小于《协定》的脚注.在认定程序上,仅欧盟有类似《协定》的规定.《协定》以脚注解释IUU捕捞定义对缔约方的约束力有待在实践中检验.各缔约方应当进一步完善国内立法以促进《协定》IUU捕捞补贴禁令的有效实施.对中国而言,需整合分散条款,完善立法,更好地履行国际义务.

The Fisheries Subsidies Agreement(AFS)adopted by the World Trade Organization in 2021 introduced a ban on subsidies for"illegal,unreported and unregulated fishing"(hereinafter referred to as"IUU fishing").Meanwhile,the definition of IUU fishing in the"International Plan of Action for the Prevention,Suppression and Elimination of Illegal,Unreported and Unregulated Fishing"of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations was cited in the form of footnotes.In the absence of a clear definition of IUU fishing in international treaties,the domestic legislation of the contracting parties needs to ensure that the recognition rules are consistent with the Agreement,which is the basis for ensuring the effective and fair implementation of the ban.This article compares the provisions on the definition and determination procedures of IUU fishing in the domestic laws of 10 major fisheries and subsidy providers to assess their ability to enforce the ban.The research found that in terms of the definition of IUU fishing,the European Union and Thailand directly adopted the same definition as that in the footnotes of the Agreement.The domestic laws of South Korea,the United States,China,Chile,Mexico,Norway and Japan have a definition of IUU fishing that is basically the same in content as that in the footnotes of the Agreement.However,the scope of IUU fishing stipulated in the domestic laws of India is significantly smaller than that in the footnotes of the Agreement.In terms of the determination procedure,only the European Union has provisions similar to the"Agreement".The binding force of the IUU fishing definition explained by footnotes in the Agreement on the contracting parties remains to be tested in practice.Each contracting party should further improve domestic legislation to promote the effective implementation of the IUU fishing subsidy ban under the Agreement.For China,it is necessary to integrate decentralized provisions,improve legislation and better fulfill international obligations.

苏舒;李慧媛;唐议

上海海洋大学海洋生物资源与管理学院,上海 201306上海海洋大学海洋生物资源与管理学院,上海 201306上海海洋大学海洋生物资源与管理学院,上海 201306

管理科学

IUU捕捞渔业补贴IUU捕捞认定程序世界贸易组织

IUU fishingfishery subsidyIUU fishing identification procedureWorld Trade Organization

《中国渔业经济》 2026 (4)

20-32,13

本文受农业农村部远洋渔业强链延链和"十五五"发展政策战略科学支撑项目(09240055)资助.

评论