秸秆能源化主要方式碳足迹分析OA
Carbon Footprint Analysis of Straw Energy Conversion Methods
为刻画我国秸秆主要能源利用场景的碳足迹,研究探讨秸秆沼气化、热解炭化与直燃发电3种利用模式的经济与环境效益.通过碳排放评估边界和分析方法构建,明确各不同环节对最终净减排效果的影响和主要制约因素.结果表明:黄贮秸秆沼气化利用、热解制生物炭、直燃发电的净碳排放量分别为-1.238 kgCO2·kg-1、-0.624 kgCO2·kg-1和-0.553 kgCO2·kg-1,均可扭转直接焚烧的碳排放(4.2572 kgCO2·kg1);对环境酸化的影响潜力值分别为0.0016 kg·a-1、0.0165 kg·a-1和0.01425 kg·a-1,对人类毒性的影响潜力值分别为0.732 kg·a-1、1.65 kg·a-1和1.5615 kg·a-1,沼气化利用对环境的影响潜力最小.在现有条件下,三者均呈亏损状态,当碳价格达22.0 CNY·t-1时,3种模式开始盈利,边际盈利额分别为7.47 CNY、4.396 CNY和4.26 CNY.综上,沼气化利用优势明显,热解炭化与直燃发电因地制宜应用仍具有经济可行性.
In order to describe the carbon footprint of the main energy utilization scenarios of straw in China,this study ex-plores the economic and environmental benefits of three utilization modes of straw biogas,pyrolysis carbonization and direct combustion power generation.Through the construction of carbon emission assessment boundary and analysis method,the influence of different links on the final net emission reduction effect and the main constraints are clarified.The results showed that the net carbon emissions of biogas utilization,pyrolysis biochar and direct-fired power generation were-1.238 kgCO2·kg-1,-0.624 kgCO2·kg-1 and-0.553 kgCO2·kg-1,respectively.All of them can reverse the carbon emissions of direct incineration(4.2572 kgCO2·kg-1).The impact potential values on environmental acidification were 0.0016 kg·a-1,0.0165 kg·a-1and 0.01425 kg·a-1,respectively,and the impact potential values on human toxicity were 0.732 kg·a-1,1.65 kg·a-1 and 1.5615 kg·a-1,respectively.Biogas utilization has the least impact on the environment.Under the existing conditions,the three models are in a state of loss.When the carbon price reaches 22.0 CNY·t-1,the three models begin to make profits,and the marginal profits are 7.47 CNY,4.396 CNY and 4.26 CNY,respectively.In sum-mary,the advantages of biogas utilization are obvious,and the application of pyrolysis carbonization and direct combustion power generation according to local conditions is still economically feasible.
黄娅;牟越;陈秋文;左耀国;李公义;陈证繁;罗涛;朱能敏;姚飞
农业农村部成都沼气科学研究所,四川成都 610041中国石油化工股份有限公司天然气分公司,北京 100000农业农村部成都沼气科学研究所,四川成都 610041农业农村部成都沼气科学研究所,四川成都 610041||青岛理工大学,山东青岛 266000农业农村部成都沼气科学研究所,四川成都 610041||青岛理工大学,山东青岛 266000中国轻工业成都设计工程有限公司,四川成都 610000农业农村部成都沼气科学研究所,四川成都 610041农业农村部成都沼气科学研究所,四川成都 610041农业农村部成都沼气科学研究所,四川成都 610041
资源环境
减排温室气体废弃物能源利用
emission reductiongreenhouse gaseswasteenergy utilization
《中国沼气》 2026 (2)
78-84,7
国家重点研发计划课题(2024YFD1700402)中国农业科学院科技创新工程(CAAS-ASTIP-2021-BIOMA).
评论