超分辨率经颅超声成像在颅内出血血肿检出和测量中的应用研究OA
Super-resolution transcranial sonography imaging for hematoma detection and measurement in patients with intracranial hemorrhage
目的 探讨超分辨率经颅超声(TCS)成像在颅内出血(ICH)血肿检出和测量中的应用价值.方法 前瞻性连续纳入2025年3月至2025年6月于空军军医大学第二附属医院神经外科重症监护病房住院治疗的ICH患者.收集患者的基线及临床资料,包括年龄、性别、ICH类型(高血压性、动脉瘤性)、糖尿病、高血压病、既往脑梗死、冠心病、入院收缩压、入院舒张压、入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、CT至超分辨率TCS成像时间、超分辨率TCS成像前是否手术治疗及手术治疗方式(脑室穿刺外引流术、开颅颅内血肿清除术、颅内血肿穿刺外引流术、去骨瓣减压术、动脉瘤开颅夹闭术或介入栓塞术).所有患者均于入院12 h内完成头部CT检查,评估出血部位、血肿数量、血肿形态、血肿最大轴位层面的最大前后径及最大左右径、血肿周围水肿情况、是否合并血肿破入脑室、蛛网膜下腔出血、多发血肿伴融合、弥漫性出血等.所有患者均于头部CT检查后24 h内完成超分辨率TCS成像,以中脑、丘脑、侧脑室3个平面为基准,移动探头连续扫查颅内血肿情况,将颅内异常回声团块标记为血肿,并依据显示的解剖标志定位血肿位置.血肿不可见者记为"未检出".排除无法可靠定量的血肿,包括弥漫性出血导致的边界不清或过小(直径≤1cm)血肿、多处血肿伴融合导致的形态不规则血肿,额、枕、顶叶血肿部位出现伪像干扰导致无法显示全貌的血肿及周围水肿明显致无法准确确定边界的血肿.明确血肿最大显示切面,测量血肿最大前后径和最大左右径.以头部CT检查结果为诊断标准,将超分辨率TCS成像血肿检出与测量结果与头部CT结果进行对比,术前超分辨率TCS成像与术前CT比较,术后超分辨率TCS成像与术后CT比较.构建2×2列联表,计算超分辨率TCS成像检测的真阳性、假阳性、真阴性及假阴性例数,并基于此计算敏感度、准确度和阳性预测值.采用组内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析进行观察者间的一致性评价和两种检测方法测量值的一致性评价,ICC值>0.90为一致性极好,>0.75~0.90为一致性良好,0.50~0.75为一致性中等,<0.50为一致性不足;Bland-Altman分析以数据点位于95%一致性界限(LOA)内为具有较好的一致性.采用Pearson相关性分析分析两种影像学检查方法测量结果的相关性,|r|>0.90~1.00为极强相关,0.70~0.89为强相关.采用相对误差(计算公式:|超分辨率TCS成像测量值-CT测量值|/CT测量值× 100%)评估两种影像学方法测量结果的误差水平,相对误差越小表示两种影像学方法的测量偏差越小,测量精度越高.结果 共纳入ICH患者39例,男29例,女10例,年龄25~83岁,平均(58±13)岁.其中高血压性ICH 36例,动脉瘤性ICH 3例.(1)39例患者头部CT至超分辨率TCS成像时间为0.33~23.73 h,中位时间5.00(3.00,9.18)h.经头部CT检出10个出血部位共119个血肿,其中脑室血肿27.7%(33/119),蛛网膜下腔血肿19.3%(23/119),基底节血肿17.6%(21/119),额叶血肿9.2%(11/119),颞叶血肿9.2%(11/119),丘脑血肿 5.9%(7/119),顶枕叶血肿 4.2%(5/119),小脑血肿 3.4%(4/119),岛叶血肿2.5%(3/119),半卵圆中心血肿0.8%(1/119).超分辨率TCS成像的ICH检出率为89.92%,其中真阳性107个,假阳性18个,真阴性0个,假阴性12个;检出血肿的敏感度为89.92%,准确度为78.10%,阳性预测值为85.60%;超分辨率TCS成像对脑室、蛛网膜下腔和基底节血肿具有较高的检出准确度,分别为94.12%、95.83%、95.45%,对顶枕叶、岛叶、半卵圆中心血肿的检出准确度较低,分别为42.86%、40.00%和0.(2)将超分辨率TCS成像无法可靠定量测量的血肿排出后余41个边界明确、可供测量的血肿.观察者间一致性评价结果显示,超分辨率TCS成像检测者测量的血肿最大左右径一致性良好[ICC=0.880(95%CI:0.787~0.934)],测量的血肿最大前后径一致性极好[ICC=0.903(95%CI:0.825~0.947)],所有数据点均位于95%LOA内.超分辨率TCS成像与头部CT测量41个血肿的平均最大前后径分别为(4.36±1.21)、(3.99±1.47)cm,平均最大左右径分别为(3.80±1.19)、(3.40±1.24)cm,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01);超分辨率TCS成像与头部CT测量的血肿最大前后径和最大左右径的中位相对误差分别为11.6(6.3,28.1)%和15.4(7.8,30.4)%.一致性评价结果显示,超分辨率TCS成像与头部CT测量血肿最大前后径的ICC为 0.843(95%CI:0.659~0.922),最大左右径的 ICC 为 0.827(95%CI:0.564~0.921),均一致性良好;Bland-Altman分析显示,相较于头部CT,超分辨率TCS成像测量的血肿最大前后径及最大左右径存在系统性高估[差值平均值分别为(0.37±0.68)、(0.41±0.62)cm],但绝大多数数据点位于95%LOA内.Pearson相关性分析结果显示,超分辨率TCS成像与头部CT测量的血肿最大前后径(|r|=0.867)及最大左右径(|r|=0.891)均成强相关性(均P<0.01).结论 超分辨率TCS成像在ICH的检出及血肿直径测量中具有一定的敏感度和准确度,或有助于重症ICH患者血肿监测,但目前尚不能替代头部CT作为诊断标准.
Objective To explore the application value of super-resolution transcranial sonography(TCS)imaging in the detection and measurement of hematomas in intracranial hemorrhage(ICH).Methods Prospectively enroll consecutive ICH patients admitted to the intensive care unit of Department of Neurosurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University,from March 2025 to June 2025.Baseline and clinical data were collected,including age,sex,type of ICH(hypertensive ICH,aneurysmal ICH),diabetes mellitus,hypertension,previous cerebral infarction,coronary heart disease,admission systolic and diastolic blood pressure,admission Glasgow coma scale(GCS)score,CT to super-resolution TCS imaging time,whether surgical treatment was performed before super-resolution TCS imaging and,if so,the surgical modality(external ventricular drainage,craniotomy for intracranial hematoma evacuation,percutaneous intracranial hematoma drainage,decompressive craniectomy,craniotomy for aneurysm clipping,or endovascular embolization).All patients underwent head CT within 12 h of admission to evaluate the hemorrhage location,number of hematomas,hematoma morphology,maximum anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters of the hematoma on the axial plane,presence of perilesional edema,and whether the hematoma had ruptured into the ventricle,subarachnoid hemorrhage,multiple confluent hematomas,or diffuse hemorrhage.All patients underwent super-resolution TCS imaging within 24 h after cranial CT examination.With the three planes of the midbrain,thalamus,and lateral ventricles as reference,the probe was moved to perform continuous scanning for intracranial hematomas.Abnormal intracranial echo masses were marked as hematomas,and the location of each hematoma was determined according to the visualized anatomical landmarks.The cases with non-visualized hematomas were marked as"not detected".Hematomas that could not be reliably quantified were excluded,including those with unclear boundaries caused by diffuse hemorrhage or excessively small size(diameter≤1 cm),those with irregular morphology caused by fusion of multiple hematomas,those located in the frontal,occipital,and parietal lobes for which the full contour could not be visualized due to artifact interference,and those whose boundaries could not be accurately determined due to obvious surrounding edema.For the remaining hematomas,the slice displaying the maximum size of a hematoma was identified,and the maximum anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters of the hematoma were measured.Using head CT findings as the diagnostic standard,the results of super-resolution TCS imaging were compared with those of head CT.Preoperative super-resolution TCS imaging findings were compared with preoperative CT findings,and postoperative super-resolution TCS imaging findings were compared with postoperative CT findings.A 2 × 2 contingency table was constructed to calculate the numbers of true positives,false positives,true negatives,and false negatives for super-resolution TCS imaging,based on which the sensitivity,accuracy,and positive predictive value were calculated.Inter-observer consistency and consistency of measurements between the two imaging methods were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients(ICC)and Bland-Altman analysis,with ICC>0.90 as excellent consistency,ICC>0.75-0.90 as good consistency,ICC between 0.50 and 0.75 as moderate consistency,ICC<0.50 as insufficient consistency;Bland-Altman analysis shows good consistency when data points was within the 95%limits of agreement(LOA).Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation of measurements between the two imaging methods,with|r|>0.90-1.00 indicating extremely strong correlation and 0.70-0.89 indicating strong correlation.The relative error was calculated as(|super-resolution TCS imaging measurement-CT measurement|)/CT measurement × 100%to assess the level of measurement error between the two imaging methods;a smaller relative error indicated smaller measurement deviation and higher measurement precision between the two imaging methods.Results A total of 39 patients with ICH(29 males and 10 females)were enrolled,with an age range of 25 to 83 years and a mean age of(58±13)years.Among them,36 patients had hypertensive ICH and 3 had ICH due to ruptured intracranial aneurysms.(1)The time interval from head CT to super-resolution TCS imaging ranged from 0.33 to 23.73 h,with a median interval of 5.00(3.00,9.18)h.A total of 10 bleeding sites and 119 hematomas were detected by head CT,among which intraventricular hematomas accounted for 27.7%(33/119),subarachnoid hematomas for 19.3%(23/119),basal ganglia hematomas for 17.6%(21/119),frontal lobe hematomas for 9.2%(11/119),temporal lobe hematomas for 9.2%(11/119),thalamic hematomas for 5.9%(7/119),parieto-occipital lobe hematomas for 4.2%(5/119),cerebellar hematomas for 3.4%(4/119),insular lobe hematomas for 2.5%(3/119),and centrum semiovale hematomas for 0.8%(1/119).The detection rate of ICH by super-resolution TCS imaging was 89.92%,with 107 true positives,18 false positives,0 true negatives,and 12 false negatives.The sensitivity for hematoma detection was 89.92%,the accuracy was 78.10%,and the positive predictive value was 85.60%.Super-resolution TCS imaging showed high detection accuracy for intraventricular,subarachnoid space and basal ganglia hemorrhages,at 94.12%,95.83%and 95.45%,respectively,whereas the detection accuracy was relatively low for hematomas in the parieto-occipital lobe,insular lobe,and centrum semiovale,at 42.86%,40.00%,and 0,respectively.(2)After excluding hematomas that could not be reliably quantified by super-resolution TCS imaging,41 hematomas with well-defined boundaries suitable for measurement were retained.Inter-observer consistency evaluation demonstrated good consistency(ICC=0.880,95%CI 0.787-0.934)for measurements of hematoma mediolateral diameter and excellent consistency(ICC=0.903,95%CI 0.825-0.947)for measurements of anteroposterior diameter using super-resolution TCS imaging,all date points fell within the 95%LOA.The maximum anteroposterior diameters of 41 hematomas measured by super-resolution TCS imaging and cranial CT were(4.36±1.21)cm and(3.99±1.47)cm,respectively,and the maximum mediolateral diameters were(3.80±1.19)cm and(3.40±1.24)cm,respectively;the differences were statistically significant(both P<0.01).The median relative errors between the maximum anteroposterior diameters and maximum mediolateral diameters measured by super-resolution TCS imaging and cranial CT were 11.6%(6.3%,28.1%)and 15.4%(7.8%,30.4%),respectively.The consistency evaluation showed that the intraclass ICC between the maximum anteroposterior diameters of hematomas measured by super-resolution TCS imaging and cranial CT was 0.843(95%CI 0.659-0.922),and the ICC for the maximum mediolateral diameter was 0.827(95%CI 0.564-0.921),both indicating good consistency.Bland-Altman analysis showed that compared with cranial CT,measurements by super-resolution TCS imaging had a systematic overestimation of the maximum anteroposterior diameter and maximum mediolateral diameter of hematomas(the mean differences were[0.37±0.68]cm and[0.41±0.62]cm,respectively),while most data points fell within the 95%LOA.Pearson correlation analysis showed that the maximum anteroposterior diameters measured by super-resolution TCS imaging and cranial CT had a strong positive correlation(|r|=0.867,P<0.01),and the maximum mediolateral diameters also had a strong positive correlation(|r|=0.891,P<0.01).Conclusions Super-resolution TCS imaging demonstrates high sensitivity and accuracy in the detection of ICH and shows good reliability in the measurement of hematoma diameters.It can serve as a low-cost,efficient bedside supplementary monitoring tool for hematoma surveillance in critically ill patients to assist clinical decision-making and condition assessment.However,it can not currently replace head CT as the standard for diagnosis.
余浩清;金京兰;闫灵娟;程洪瑜;阴玮伟;满明昊;王佳
710038 西安,空军军医大学(第四军医大学)第二附属医院超声医学科710038 西安,空军军医大学(第四军医大学)第二附属医院超声医学科710038 西安,空军军医大学(第四军医大学)第二附属医院超声医学科710038 西安,空军军医大学(第四军医大学)第二附属医院超声医学科710038 西安,空军军医大学(第四军医大学)第二附属医院超声医学科710038 西安,空军军医大学(第四军医大学)第二附属医院神经外科710038 西安,空军军医大学(第四军医大学)第二附属医院超声医学科
超分辨率成像经颅超声颅内出血血肿监测
Super-resolution imagingTranscranial sonographyIntracranial hemorrhageHematomaMonitoring
《中国脑血管病杂志》 2026 (3)
182-191,10
唐都医院2025年度学科助推计划
评论