首页|期刊导航|中国癌症杂志|不同严重程度的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂相关性肺炎的临床特征分析

不同严重程度的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂相关性肺炎的临床特征分析OA

Clinical analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonia of varying severity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

中文摘要英文摘要

背景和目的:目前对于免疫检查点抑制剂相关性肺炎(checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonia,CIP)的研究多集中于其临床特征、危险因素、患者预后及与临床疗效的关系,但这些研究多数未区分低、高级别CIP.本研究旨在探讨非小细胞肺癌患者低、高级别CIP的临床特征差异及发生高级别CIP的危险因素.方法:回顾性收集2018年1月—2023年12月河北北方学院附属第一医院收治的接受免疫检查点抑制剂(immune checkpoint inhibitor,ICI)治疗的92例晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者的病历资料,根据不良事件通用术语标准(Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events,CTCAE)5.0对CIP进行分级:无症状/轻度(1级)、中度(2级)、重度(3级)、危及生命(4级)和死亡(5级).将1~2级定义为低级别CIP,3~5级定义为高级别CIP.对比两组患者的临床特征、实验室指标、影像学特征、治疗和预后,采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析筛选NSCLC患者发生高级别CIP的影响因素,采用Spearman相关系数对中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio,NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(platelet-lymphocyte ratio,PLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(systemic immune-inflammation index,SII)、涎液化糖链抗原-6(Krebs von den Lungen-6,KL-6)与CIP分级进行相关性分析,采用受试者工作特征曲线分析外周血KL-6水平对高级别CIP的预测价值,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线进行生存分析,本研究经河北北方学院附属第一医院伦理委员会批准(编号:L2026025).结果:本研究最终纳入92例CIP患者,其中低级别CIP 56例,高级别CIP 36例.低、高级别CIP在年龄、发热、功能状态(performance status,PS)评分、CIP期间合并感染方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),高级别CIP的NLR、PLR、SII、KL-6水平均高于低级别CIP(P<0.05),低、高级别CIP在非特异性间质性肺炎、合并肺气肿、合并胸腔积液、胸膜增厚方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).单因素logistic回归分析显示,发热、PS评分3~4分、合并肺气肿、外周血KL-6高水平为晚期NSCLC患者发生高级别CIP的危险因素(P<0.05).多因素logistic回归分析显示,合并肺气肿、外周血KL-6高水平是晚期NSCLC患者发生高级别CIP的独立危险因素(P<0.05).基线NLR、PLR、SII、KL-6与CIP分级均呈正相关性(P<0.05).KL-6预测高级别CIP的曲线下面积为0.895,灵敏度为83.9%,特异度为86.1%.低、高级别CIP在甲泼尼龙≥80 mg/d的疗程、起始口服激素>1 mg/kg/d、对激素的反应、使用免疫抑制剂、使用免疫球蛋白、抗生素治疗、抗真菌治疗方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).高级别CIP的主要死亡原因为CIP疾病本身,低级别CIP主要死亡原因为肿瘤进展,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).通过Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析结果显示,低级别CIP的中位总生存期(overall survival,OS)为19.20个月,高级别CIP为16.60个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:与低级别CIP患者相比,高级别CIP患者年龄大、PS评分高、发热及肺部感染性疾病多,NLR、PLR、SII、KL-6水平高且与CIP分级呈正相关性,影像学类型以非特异性间质性肺炎为主,合并肺气肿、胸腔积液、胸膜增厚比例高,使用激素剂量高,疗程长,预后差,高水平KL-6和肺气肿是高级别CIP的独立危险因素.

Background and purpose:Currently,research on checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonia(CIP)primarily focuses on its clinical characteristics,risk factors,prognosis,and relationship to clinical efficacy.However,these studies fail to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade CIP.This study aims to explore the differences of clinical characteristics between low-grade and high-grade CIP in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),as well as the risk factors for the development of high-grade CIP.Methods:We retrospectively collected the case records of 92 patients with advanced NSCLC who received treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from January 2018 to December 2023.CIP was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE)5.0:asymptomatic/mild(grade 1),moderate(grade 2),severe(grade 3),life-threatening(grade 4)and death(grade 5).Grades 1-2 were defined as low-grade CIP,and grades 3-5 were defined as high-grade CIP.The clinical characteristics,laboratory indicators,imaging features,treatment and prognosis of the two groups of patients were compared.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to screen the influencing factors of high-grade CIP in NSCLC patients.Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),platelet-lymphocyte ratio(PLR),systemic immune-inflammation index(SII),Krebs von den Lungen-6(KL-6),and CIP grading.Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of peripheral blood KL-6 levels for high-grade CIP,and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was used for survival analysis.This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University(L2026025).Results:This study ultimately included 92 CIP patients,with 56 cases of low-grade CIP and 36 cases of high-grade CIP.Low-and high-grade CIP showed statistically significant differences in age,fever,performance status(PS)score and concurrent infections during CIP(P<0.05).The levels of NLR,PLR,SII and KL-6 were higher in high-grade CIP than in low-grade CIP(P<0.05).There were significant differences in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia,concurrent emphysema,concurrent pleural effusion and pleural thickening between low-and high-grade CIP(P<0.05).Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that fever,PS score of 3-4,concurrent emphysema and high peripheral blood KL-6 levels were risk factors for the development of high-grade CIP in patients with advanced NSCLC(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that concurrent emphysema and high peripheral blood KL-6 levels were independent risk factors for the development of high-grade CIP in patients with advanced NSCLC(P<0.05).Baseline NLR,PLR,SII and KL-6 levels were positively correlated with CIP grade(P<0.05).The area under the curve for KL-6 in predicting high-grade CIP was 0.895,with a sensitivity of 83.9%and a specificity of 86.1%.There were significant differences in the duration of methylprednisolone treatment≥80 mg/d,initial oral steroid dose>1 mg/kg/d,steroid response,use of immunosuppressants,immunoglobulin,antibiotics and antifungal treatment between low-and high-grade CIP(P<0.05).The main cause of death in high-grade CIP was the CIP disease itself,while the main cause of death in low-grade CIP was tumor progression,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that the median overall survival(OS)for low-grade CIP was 19.20 months,while for high-grade CIP it was 16.60 months,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with patients with low-grade CIP,those with high-grade CIP were older,had higher PS scores,more frequently presented with fever and pulmonary infectious diseases,and had higher levels of NLR,PLR,SII and KL-6,which were positively correlated with CIP grade.Imaging findings were predominantly nonspecific interstitial pneumonia,with a high proportion of concurrent emphysema,pleural effusion and pleural thickening.Patients with high-grade CIP had higher steroid doses,longer treatment durations and poorer prognoses.High levels of KL-6 and emphysema were independent risk factors for high-grade CIP.

袁胜芳;姬泽萱;任婕;李少华;张秀珑;王布

河北北方学院附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000河北北方学院附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000河北北方学院附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000河北北方学院附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000河北北方学院附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000河北北方学院附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000

医药卫生

免疫检查点抑制剂非小细胞肺癌肺炎临床分析危险因素

Immune checkpoint inhibitorsNon-small cell lung cancerPneumoniaClinical analysisRisk factor

《中国癌症杂志》 2026 (3)

268-277,10

河北省自然科学基金(H2025405013). Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation(H2025405013).

10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2026.03.007

评论