基于 RECARGA 模型不同生物滞留池设计方法评价OA
Evaluation of Different Bioretention Cell Design Methods Based on the RECARGA Model
基于 RECARGA 模型模拟 8 种方法设计的生物滞留池在 24.3、37.2、47.3 mm 3 种降雨量条件下的运行效果.常规法和面积比 PGC 法 2 种设计方法在降雨量较小地区削减洪峰值的效果明显,生物滞留池地下水补充占入流量的比例随降雨量增大而增加;PGC_Comp、SCS、Haddam 和RFM-Darcy 4 种方法设计的生物滞留池对径流总量的削减方面效果较好,生物滞留池随降雨量的增加,其地下水补充占入流量的比例反而减少,而 WDNR 法设计的生物滞留池地下水补充占入流量的比例与降雨量无递增递减关系,在 37.2 mm 的降雨情况下地下水补充占入流量的比例最低,24.3 mm 的降雨情况下地下水补充占比例高于 47.3 mm 的降雨情况.
This study employs the RECARGA model to simulate the performance of bioretention cells designed using eight different methods under three rainfall conditions:24.3 mm,37.2 mm,and 47.3 mm.The results indicate that the conventional design method and the PGC area-ratio method are particularly effective in reducing flood peaks in areas with lower rainfall.Moreover,the proportion of groundwater recharge to inflow in bioretention cells increases with higher rainfall amounts.In contrast,bioretention cells designed using the PGC_Comp,SCS,Haddam,and RFM-Darcy methods show better performance in reducing total runoff volume.However,as rainfall increases,the proportion of groundwater recharge to inflow in these designs decreases.Notably,the WDNR method shows no clear increasing or decreasing relationship between the proportion of groundwater recharge to inflow and rainfall amount.The lowest proportion of groundwater recharge occurs under 37.2 mm of rainfall,while the proportion under 24.3 mm of rainfall is higher than that under 47.3 mm.
郝燕;任高翔;王妍
合肥城市学院 土木工程学院,安徽 合肥 238079合肥城市学院 土木工程学院,安徽 合肥 238079合肥城市学院 土木工程学院,安徽 合肥 238079
资源环境
生物滞留池RECARGA 模型降雨量
bioretention cellRECARGA modelrainfall amount
《徐州工程学院学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (1)
31-38,8
安徽省高校科学研究项目(2023AH053242,2022AH052480)安徽省质量工程项目(2022zygzts084,2023sdxx148,2023sdxx149,2024cxtd193)
评论