人民城市理念下中国城市高质量发展内在逻辑与实践历程的再审视OACHSSCD
Re-Examining the Internal Logic and Practical Evolution of High-Quality Urban Development in China under the People-City Concept
城市高质量发展是中国式现代化的重要内容.马克思主义理论在城市高质量发展研究中的缺位,导致学界多将中国城市实践片面化、抽象化、模糊化理解为"以人民为中心"的发展.基于马克思社会发展评价理论,从理论应然、历史实然与现实必然维度剖析了"人民城市"理念下城市高质量发展的内在逻辑遵循,发现"人民城市"理念下城市高质量发展的本质在于人的发展,但其既非将人视为资本增殖的工具,更非抛开生产力空谈人的发展,而是坚持历史尺度与价值尺度的相互统一.中华人民共和国成立以来,不同历史时期人民的核心利益存在差别,若对人民利益现实性不加以区别就会陷入用抽象的人民利益来掩盖生产力落后或资本逻辑占据主导地位的困境.因此,不同历史时期城市高质量发展的历史尺度与价值尺度并不总是完全统一,而是在坚持"两点论"与"重点论"基础上促进两者间的辩证统一.中国特色社会主义进入新时代,"人民城市"理念引领中国城市高质量发展实践真正实现了历史尺度与价值尺度的完美融合.
The deficiency of Marxist theoretical frameworks in urban high-quality development research has precipitated a scholarly tendency to reductively interpret China's urban practices through an oversimplified,abstract,and ambiguously defined"people-centered development"paradigm.Systematically clarifying the inherent logical principles and practical trajectories of urban excellence under the people-city concept paradigm constitutes not only a foundational prerequisite for comprehensively advancing institutional reforms in urban development but also a critical mechanism for dispelling multifarious misconceptions and reinforcing the cohesive function of socialist ideology. This study establishes a tripartite analytical framework based on Marx's social development evaluation theory,examining the inherent logical principles of urban high-quality development under the people-city concept paradigm through three dimensions:normative analysis of theoretical imperatives,historical positivism of empirical actualities,and dialectical synthesis of practical necessities.This approach historically clarifies conceptual ambiguities in implementing people-city concept while establishing foundational logical principles for institutional reforms in socialist urban governance. The study finds that the essence of evaluating high-quality urban development under the people-city concept lies in human development.However,this neither treats people as tools for capital proliferation nor discusses human development in isolation from productive forces.Instead,it insists on the unification of historical and value dimensions.On the one hand,it explicitly distinguishes the"people"as concrete historical agents rather than abstract entities,recognizing the dynamic evolution of their core interests across temporal contexts.Failure to contextualize these material interests risks theoretical obfuscation,where abstract conceptions of public welfare mask either underdeveloped productive forces or the hegemony of capital logic.On the other hand,while acknowledging the instrumental role of productivity enhancement through reform and opening-up policies alongside socialist market economy development,the study resists technological determinism by reaffirming the people's agential centrality in shaping urban transformation.The historical achievements in urban quality development ultimately derive from collective human agency,necessitating balanced valuation of productive forces without absolutizing their role.Consequently,the historical and value dimensions of urban development demonstrate contingent rather than absolute unity across different eras.Their dialectical integration requires adherence to the"Two-Point Theory"(holistic contradiction analysis)and"Key-Point Theory"(prioritization of principal contradictions).Notably,the new era has witnessed the people-city concept actualizing the harmonious convergence of these dual dimensions in China's urban praxis,marking a paradigm shift in developmental epistemology. As an interdisciplinary frontier research hotspot,the multifaceted interpretations of high-quality urban development from diverse disciplinary perspectives have led to a contested theoretical conceptualization of this paradigm.This paper innovatively applies the people-city concept through the lens of Marx's theory of social development evaluation,proposing that the essence of high-quality urban development under this paradigm lies in achieving dialectical unity between historical and value dimensions,thereby overcoming prevalent theoretical misconceptions.Furthermore,through systematic analysis of extensive empirical data and policy texts,it elucidates the inherent logic governing the implementation of the people-city concept across different historical periods.This approach establishes a novel theoretical framework for understanding China's evolving practices in high-quality urban development.
李朝鹏;李思蕊;金中国
西安交通大学 马克思主义学院,陕西 西安 710049中共西安市委宣传部,陕西 西安 710008西安交通大学 经济与金融学院,陕西 西安 710049
管理科学
人民城市城市高质量发展马克思社会发展评价理论人的发展历史尺度价值尺度
people-cityurban high-quality developmentMarx's theory of social development evaluationhuman developmenthistorical yardstickvalue yardstick
《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (2)
26-37,12
国家社会科学基金青年项目(23CTJ008)国家资助博士后研究人员计划项目(GZB20230583).
评论