首页|期刊导航|现代教育技术|如何进行创造性思维大规模测评

如何进行创造性思维大规模测评OA

How to Conduct Large-Scale Assessment of Creative Thinking?

中文摘要英文摘要

创造性思维作为拔尖创新人才培养的关键要素,其科学测评是教育评价改革的重要方向.PISA 2022 创造性思维测评框架为大规模标准化评价提供了成熟的参照依据,但人工评阅存在标准难统一、效率低下、质量难保障等问题,亟需技术赋能.基于此,文章构建了大语言模型支持的"人在环路"人机协同评阅模式,并从理论基础、关键技术、实践路径三方面阐释了应用此模式进行创造性思维测评的实现机理.之后,文章以上海学生创造性思维测评项目为案例,通过人工与人机协同两种评阅方式的相关数据对比分析验证该模式的有效性,发现:两种评阅方式均可靠,但人机协同评阅的因子载荷值和区分度值均高于人工评阅,且人机协同评阅中人类评阅者每人的工作量减少了约66.7%;人机协同评阅的适配性受任务结构化程度的影响,其中表达类题型需要更深度的人类介入.文章的研究为创造性思维大规模标准化测评提供了兼顾质量与效率的人机协同路径和实证依据,也可为人工智能赋能更广泛高阶思维测评的规范化推进提供借鉴.

Creative thinking,as a key element in the cultivation of top-notch innovative talents,its scientific assessment is an important direction for the reform of educational evaluation.The PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment Framework provides a mature reference for large-scale standardized evaluation.However,manual scoring has problems such as difficult standard unification,low efficiency and poor quality guarantee,which urgently needs technological empowerment.Based on this,the paper constructed a"human-in-the-loop"human-machine collaborative scoring mode supported by large language model,and explained the implementation mechanisms of applying this mode for creative thinking assessment from three aspects of theoretical basis,key technologies and practical paths.Subsequently,taking the Shanghai student creative thinking assessment project as a case study,this paper verified the effectiveness of this mode through comparative analysis of relevant data from both manual and human-machine collaborative scoring methods.It was found that both scoring methods were reliable,while the human-machine collaborative scoring showed higher factor loading values and discrimination values compared to manual scoring,and reduced the workload per human rate by approximately 66.7%in the human-machine collaborative scoring.The adaptability of human-computer collaborative assessment was influenced by the degree of task structuring,and expression-type questions required deeper human intervention.The research in this paper provided a human-machine collaborative pathway and empirical basis that can balance quality and efficiency for large-scale standardized assessment of creative thinking,and can also offer a reference for the standardized promotion of more extensive and higher-order thinking assessment enabled by artificial intelligence.

章璐;陆璟;顾小清

上海市教育科学研究院,上海 200032||温州大学 教育学院,浙江 温州 325000上海市教育科学研究院,上海 200032华东师范大学 教育学部,上海 200062

社会科学

创造性思维大语言模型"人在环路"人机协同评阅

creative thinkinglarge language model"human-in-the-loop"human-machine collaborative scoring

《现代教育技术》 2026 (4)

83-91,9

本文为2023年度国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目"基于义务教育新课程的学生创造力评估研究"(项目编号:BHA230134)的阶段性研究成果.

10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2026.04.009

评论