首页|期刊导航|生物骨科材料与临床研究|颈椎前路椎体次全切除术中应用3D打印椎体与传统钛笼重建的影像学及疗效对比研究

颈椎前路椎体次全切除术中应用3D打印椎体与传统钛笼重建的影像学及疗效对比研究OA

Comparative study of radiographic and clinical outcomes:3D-printed vertebral body versus traditional titanium cage reconstruction in anterior cervical corpectomy

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 比较3D打印人工椎体(3D printed artificial vertebral body,3DP-AVB)与传统钛笼融合器(titanium mesh cage,TMC)在颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术(anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion,ACCF)治疗脊髓型颈椎病(cervical spondylotic myelopathy,CSM)中的影像学及临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2019年3月至2022年9月于山东第一医科大学第一附属医院脊柱外科行单节段ACCF的58例CSM患者,根据手术植入物不同将患者分为3DP-AVB组(30例)和TMC组(28例).比较两组患者的手术参数、影像学资料、临床疗效及并发症.结果 所有患者平均随访(13.39±0.89)个月.两组术中出血量、手术时间及术后住院天数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者术后C2-C7 Cobb角、AVH、PVH均较术前显著改善(P<0.05).末次随访时,3DP-AVB组的Cobb角、AVH、PVH均优于TMC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).3DP-AVB组的沉降率较TMC组显著更低(16.67%vs 42.86%,P<0.05).3DP-AVB组融合率高于TMC组(90.00%vs 78.57%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组术后JOA、NDI评分均较术前显著改善(P<0.05),但组间及改善率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).仅TMC组1例切口乙级愈合.结论 3DP-AVB与TMC在ACCF中均可有效恢复颈椎高度和曲度,获得相仿的临床效果.但3DP-AVB与TMC相比更有利于减少内植物沉降并在数值上表现出更高的融合率趋势及影像学稳定性优势,对预防远期并发症和维持长期疗效具有重要意义.

Objective To compare the imaging and clinical efficacy of 3D printed artificial vertebral body(3DP-AVB)and traditional titanium mesh cage(TMC)in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion(ACCF)for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 58 CSM patients who underwent single-segment ACCF in the department of spinal surgery of First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from March 2019 to September 2022.The patients were divided into the 3DP-AVB group(30 cases)and the TMC group(28 cases)according to different surgical implants.The general data,surgical parameters,imaging data,clinical efficacy and complications of the two groups were compared.Results All patients were followed up for an average of(13.39±0.89)months.There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss,operation time and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).The postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle,AVH and PVH in both groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P<0.05).At the last follow-up,the Cobb angle,AVH and PVH in the 3DP-AVB group were better than those in the TMC group(P<0.05).The subsidence rate in the 3DP-AVB group was significantly lower than that in the TMC group(16.67%vs 42.86%,P<0.05).The fusion rate in the 3DP-AVB group was higher than that in the TMC group(90.00%vs 78.57%),but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The postoperative JOA and NDI scores in both groups were significantly improved(P<0.05),but there were no differences in scores or improvement rates between the two groups(P>0.05).Only 1 case in the TMC group had grade B incision healing.Conclusion Both 3DP-AVB and TMC can effectively restore cervical height and curvature in ACCF,and achieve similar clinical effects.However,compared with TMC,3DP-AVB is more beneficial in reducing implant subsidence,showing a numerical trend toward a higher fusion rate and advantages in imaging stability,which is of great significance for preventing long-term complications and maintaining long-term efficacy.

王子逸;韩文哲;王月田;李经坤;邹德波

山东第二医科大学临床医学院,山东 潍坊,261000山东第一医科大学临床医学院,山东 济南,250000山东第一医科大学第一附属医院脊柱外科,山东 济南,250000山东第一医科大学第一附属医院脊柱外科,山东 济南,250000山东第一医科大学第一附属医院脊柱外科,山东 济南,250000

医药卫生

脊髓型颈椎病颈椎前路椎体次全切除术3D打印人工椎体钛笼融合器

[Key words]Cervical spondylotic myelopathyAnterior cervical corpectomy and fusion3D printed artificial vertebral bodyTitanium mesh cage

《生物骨科材料与临床研究》 2026 (2)

14-20,7

10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2026.02.003

评论