首页|期刊导航|水土保持学报|花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地植被恢复措施的水土保持调控效应

花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地植被恢复措施的水土保持调控效应OA

Regulation Effects of Vegetation Restoration Measures on Soil and Water Conservation in Eroded and Degraded Granite Red Soil Areas

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]为探究南方花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地不同植被恢复措施对土壤质量改善情况及水土保持效益,获得不同植被恢复措施的综合调控效应,筛选最优措施.[方法]在福建省长汀县布设鱼鳞坑+阔叶树补植(Z1)、草灌乔立体混交(Z2)、条沟播草+阔叶树补植(Z3)、密穴播草(Z4)和等高草灌带(Z5)5种植被恢复措施,以马尾松纯林(CK)为对照,分析不同措施下土壤性质的差异,并对各措施的土壤质量和坡面减流减沙效益进行综合评估.[结果]1)各类植被恢复措施显著改善土壤理化性质,水分体积分数、孔隙度及平均重量直径(MWD)较 CK分别提升 16.91%~37.97%、4.56%~22.81%和 25.68%~59.62%,土壤体积质量、崩解系数和可蚀性 K 值分别降低 3.74%~18.69%、32.85%~63.41%和 10.35%~17.27%.2)土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷、速效磷和速效钾质量分数较 CK 分别提升 129.49%~321.46%、89.47%~137.99%、22.70%~78.09%、118.08%~190.88%和3.88%~166.01%,并具有明显的表层集聚效应,全钾质量分数变化无明显规律.3)土壤质量指数(SQI)评价表现为 Z1(0.746)>Z3(0.717)>Z2(0.697)>Z5(0.552)>Z4(0.551)>CK(0.280).4)各类植被恢复措施均具有较好的减流效益(27.93%~39.02%)和减沙效益(75.86%~82.87%),其中Z3措施效果最优.[结论]不同植被恢复措施均可改善土壤理化性质,提高土壤综合质量,有效降低地表径流与坡面泥沙流失.综合评判以Z3措施在土壤改良及水土保持方面表现最优,Z1和Z2次之.研究结果为红壤侵蚀退化地区水土保持措施的优化配置提供指导,并为水土流失防治策略的制定与实施提供依据.

[Objective]To investigate the effects of different vegetation restoration measures on improving soil physicochemical properties and soil-water conservation characteristics in granite red soil erosion-degraded areas of southern China,evaluate their comprehensive regulatory benefits,and identify optimal restoration measures.[Methods]The study selected five vegetation restoration measures in Changting County,Fujian Province:replanting broadleaf tree+fish scale pit(Z1),grass-shrub-arbor mixture(Z2),replanting broadleaf tree+strip ditch sowing grass(Z3),dense-hole grass sowing(Z4),and contour grass filling belt(Z5),with Pinus massoniana forest(CK)as the control.Differences in soil physicochemical properties among treatments were analyzed,and a comprehensive assessment of soil quality and slope runoff-sediment reduction benefits was conducted for each measure.[Results]1)All vegetation restoration measures significantly improved soil physicochemical properties.Compared with CK,they increased volumetric water content,porosity,and mean weight diameter(MWD)by 16.91%-37.97%,4.56%-22.81%,and 25.68%-59.62%,respectively,while reducing bulk density,disintegration coefficient,and erodibility K value by 3.74%-18.69%,32.85%-63.41%,and 10.35%-17.27%,respectively.2)Soil organic carbon,total nitrogen,total phosphorus,available phosphorus,and available potassium contents increased by 129.49%-321.46%,89.47%-137.99%,22.70%-78.09%,118.08%-190.88%,and 3.88%-166.01%compared to CK,respectively,exhibiting significant surface layer accumulation effects.However,no obvious pattern was observed in the variation of total potassium content.3)Soil Quality Index(SQI)evaluation showed the following order:Z1(0.746)>Z3(0.717)>Z2(0.697)>Z5(0.552)>Z4(0.551)>CK(0.280).4)The vegetation restoration measures exhibited significant runoff reduction(27.93%-39.02%)and sediment reduction benefits(75.86%-82.87%),among which the Z3 measure demonstrated the optimal effect.[Conclusion]All vegetation restoration measures improved soil physicochemical properties,enhanced overall soil quality,and effectively reduced surface runoff and slope sediment loss.Comprehensive assessment demonstrated that the Z3 measure delivered the best performance in soil improvement and soil-water conservation,followed by Z1 and Z2.The research findings provide guidance for the optimal allocation of soil-water conservation measures in red soil erosion-degraded areas and offer a scientific basis for formulating and implementing soil erosion prevention strategies.

周琴;吴洁玲;刘梦莹;黄少燕;查轩

福建师范大学地理科学学院、碳中和未来技术学院,福州 350117||湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地,福州 350117福建师范大学地理科学学院、碳中和未来技术学院,福州 350117||湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地,福州 350117南平市乡村振兴服务中心,福建 南平 354200福建师范大学地理科学学院、碳中和未来技术学院,福州 350117||湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地,福州 350117福建师范大学地理科学学院、碳中和未来技术学院,福州 350117||湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地,福州 350117

农业科技

侵蚀退化地植被恢复措施土壤理化性质土壤质量综合评价

erosion and degradation landvegetation restoration measuressoil physicochemical propertiescomprehensive evaluation of soil quality

《水土保持学报》 2026 (2)

175-185,11

国家自然科学基金项目(42377326)福建水利科技项目(MSK202308)国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC05054)

10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.02.004

评论