基于感性工学的家用健身器材产品设计方法研究OA
RESEARCH ON THE PRODUCT DESIGN METHOD OF HOME FITNESS EQUIPMENT BASE ON SENSORY ENFGINEERING
探究感性工学在家用健身器材设计中的应用路径.以家用健身器材设计为例,构建基于感性工学的设计框架,系统说明基于感性工学理论的设计流程与手段.依据产品定位,综合运用市场调研、用户访谈等方式筛选典型样本并提炼关键感性词汇,采用语义差分法量化用户对家用健身器材的感性认知,获取典型样本感性词汇的量化数据.借助 SPSS 软件开展因子分析和主成分分析,生成公因子方差图、解释的总方差图、碎石图及成分矩阵图,确定核心感性词汇,指导家用健身器材的设计.基于感性工学提取出"趣味的""多功能"两个影响家用健身器材设计的核心感性词汇,提出家用拳击机设计方案.基于感性工学设计的家用健身器材有效契合用户情感与功能需求,为家用健身器材的创新设计与优化升级提供科学依据与实践参考.
To explore the application path of sensory engineering in the design of home fitness equipment.Taking the design of household fitness equipment as an example,a design system based on sensory engineering is constructed,and the design process and means based on the theory of sensory engineering are systematically explained.Based on the product positioning,typical samples are screened and key emotional words are extracted by comprehensively using methods such as market research and user interviews.The semantic difference method is adopted to quantify users'emotional cognition of home fitness equipment and obtain the quantitative data of emotional words of typical samples.Factor analysis and principal component analysis were carried out with the help of SPSS software to generate common factor variance plots,explained total variance plots,gravel plots and component matrix plots,determine the core perceptual vocabulary,and guide the design of home fitness equipment.Based on sensory engineering,two core sensory words influencing the design of home fitness equipment,namely"interesting"and"multi-functional",were extracted,and a design scheme for a home boxing machine was proposed.Home fitness equipment designed based on sensory engineering effectively meets users'emotional and functional needs,providing a scientific basis and practical reference for the innovative design and optimization upgrade of home fitness equipment.
肖明悦;林清璇
武汉理工大学艺术与设计学院武汉理工大学艺术与设计学院
通用工业技术
感性工学感性需求语义差分法家用健身器材拳击机设计
Sensory engineeringEmotional needsSemantic difference methodHome fitness equipmentBoxing machine design
《设计》 2026 (4)
95-99,5
评论