浙江省职业卫生技术服务质量现状及管理对策研究OA
Current quality status and management countermeasures of occupational health technical ser-vices in Zhejiang Province
[背景]职业卫生技术服务质量直接关系劳动者健康权益与职业病防控效能.然而当前该行业仍面临严峻挑战:机构违法行为偶有发生,从业不规范问题仍突出,严重制约服务效能. [目的]评估浙江省职业卫生技术服务质量的现状,并提出质量提升对策,为政策优化和服务质量改进提供依据. [方法]以浙江省截至 2024年 4月 30日前获得资质的 69家职业卫生技术服务机构为样本,包括 3家公立机构和 66家民营机构(含原甲级 3家、原乙级 28家、原丙级 11家及新取证24家).依据《浙江省职业卫生技术服务质量监测技术方案》和《浙江省职业卫生检测能力比对技术方案》,组建由国家和省级专家构成的质量评估工作组,通过资料评审、现场检查、技能考核等方式,从资质保持与符合性、技术服务规范性、技术服务真实性、检测能力验证四个维度开展评估. [结果]浙江省职业卫生技术服务机构以民营为主(82.5%),整体服务质量存在明显差异.各机构在资质保持与符合性合格率、技术服务规范性合格率、技术服务真实性合格率及检测能力验证优秀率分别为 81.5%、80.7%、97.3%、90.4%.资质保持方面,原丙级与新取证机构的"环境条件"(合格率 49.8%、56.7%)及"仪器设备"合格率(58.2%、65.6%)显著低于其他类型;技术服务规范性中,"规范开展现场调查"合格率最低(67.4%),新取证机构仅为48.0%;技术服务真实性方面,原丙级机构存在空白样品无原始谱图等问题(合格率 85.7%);检测能力验证中,公立与原甲级机构优秀率达 100%,但原丙级和新取证机构表现较弱,原丙级有机类项目不合格率达20%;新取证机构粉尘类项目不合格率为10.3%. [结论]浙江省职业卫生技术服务总体质量仍有较大提升空间,尤其在机构基础条件、现场调查规范性、有机及粉尘类检测能力方面,原丙级与新取证机构是质量管理的重点对象.建议采取差异化的监管策略,加强事中事后监管,逐步提升各机构职业卫生技术服务质量.
[Background]The quality of occupational health technical services is directly linked to the pro-tection of workers'health rights and the efficacy of occupational disease prevention and control.However,the industry still faces critical challenges:sporadic instances of institutional non-com-pliance and persistent irregularities in professional practice continue to undermine overall service performance. [Objective]To assess the current quality status of occupational health technical services in Zhe-jiang Province and propose countermeasures for quality improvement,providing a scientific basis for policy optimization and service delivery quality enhancement. [Methods]A total of 69 occupational health technical service institutions in Zhejiang Province that obtained formal accreditation as of April 30,2024,were sampled,including 3 public institutions and 66 private institutions(comprising 3 formerly Class-A,28 formerly Class-B,11 formerly Class-C,and 24 newly certified institutions).Following the Technical Protocol for Quality Monitoring of Occupational Health Technical Service in Zhejiang Province and the Technical Protocol for Proficiency Testing of Occupational Health Detection in Zhejiang Province,a quality assessment task force comprising national and provincial experts was es-tablished.Evaluation was conducted across four dimensions:qualification maintenance and compliance,standardization of technical ser-vices,authenticity of technical services,and proficiency testing,utilizing a combination of document review,on-site inspections,and technical skill assessments. [Results]The occupational health technical service institutions in Zhejiang Province were predominantly private entities(82.5%),with significant disparities in overall service quality.The pass rates for qualification maintenance and compliance,technical service standard-ization,technical service authenticity,and the excellence rate for laboratory proficiency testing were 81.5%,80.7%,97.3%,and 90.4%,respectively.Regarding qualification maintenance,the pass rates for"environmental conditions"(49.8%,56.7%)and"instrumentation and equipment"(58.2%、65.6%)were significantly lower for formerly Class-C and newly certified institutions compared to other cate-gories.In terms of technical standardization,"standardized on-site inspections"recorded the lowest pass rate(67.4%),with newly certified institutions at only 48.0%.Regarding technical service authenticity,formerly Class-C institutions exhibited issues such as missing raw chromatograms for blank samples(85.7%pass rate).In laboratory proficiency testing,public and formerly Class-A institutions achieved 100%excellence rates,but the performance of formerly Class-C and newly certified institutions was comparatively weak;specifically,the failure rate for organic analysis in formerly Class-C institutions reached 20%;the failure rate for dust testing items in newly certified insti-tutions was 10.3%. [Conclusion]The overall quality of occupational health technical services in Zhejiang Province still requires significant improvement,par-ticularly in basic institutional conditions,the standardization of on-site inspections,and laboratory proficiency in organic and dust analy-sis.Formerly Class-C and newly certified institutions should be the primary focus of quality management efforts.Differentiated regulatory strategies are recommended,alongside strengthening interim and ex-post supervision to gradually enhance the quality of occupational health technical services across all institutions.
徐秋凉;邹华;汉锋;王鹏;周振;李飞;谢红卫;胡勇;袁伟明;周莉芳
浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051中国疾病预防控制中心职业卫生与中毒控制研究所,北京 100050浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051浙江省疾病预防控制中心职业健康与辐射防护所,浙江 杭州 310051
医药卫生
职业卫生技术服务质量现状评估管理对策浙江省
occupational health technical servicequalitystatusassessmentmanagement countermeasureZhejiang Province
《环境与职业医学》 2026 (3)
341-346,6
浙江省疾病预防控制基金项目(2025JK153)浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2023KY085)
评论