首页|期刊导航|能源环境保护|融合历史过程与未来工况的污泥热解气化废气排放动态预测

融合历史过程与未来工况的污泥热解气化废气排放动态预测OA

Dynamic Prediction of Sludge Pyrolysis–Gasification Exhaust Emissions by Integrating Historical Processes and Future Operating Conditions

中文摘要英文摘要

污泥热解气化在资源回收方面优势显著,但运行中产生的 SO2 等废气制约了该技术的推广.精准预测废气排放并优化工艺参数,是提升其应用价值的关键.本研究基于某工厂连续45天的分钟级运行数据(共 64 801条、106维),构建了一种融合历史过程与未来工况的时序预测框架,系统对比了极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、梯度提升(CatBoost)、非线性模型(NLinear)及时域融合变换(TFT)等模型的预测性能,并结合夏普利加性解释(SHAP)与累计局部效应(ALE)可解释方法解析了工艺机理.结果表明,融合动态特征与滞后效应的时序框架能显著提升复杂工业过程的建模精度.在所有测试模型中,CatBoost表现最优,决定系数(R2)达到 76.5%,较未引入时序框架的截面模型(R2=22.5%)有大幅提升,同时平均绝对误差(MAE)降低了 50.36%,表明该框架能有效捕捉复杂工业的动态变化与滞后影响.此外,研究还揭示了气化炉出口温度、燃烧炉炉内温度等关键因素对 SO2 排放的非线性影响,并提出将蒸汽压力、气化炉出口温度和燃烧炉炉内温度分别控制在 0.28~0.30 MPa、100~160℃和 800~900℃区间,可在提高资源回收效率的同时有效控制SO2 排放.本研究为废气精准预测与工艺优化提供了数据–机理融合的解决方案,也为其他工业过程调控提供了方法论参考.

The pyrolysis–gasification process has emerged as a cutting-edge technology for sludge treatment and disposal because of its resource-recovery potential and high efficiency.However,the emissions of harmful gases such as SO2 during operation limit the widespread adoption of this technology.Achieving accurate emission prediction and optimizing process parameters to improve both economic and environmental performance are therefore crucial.In this study,we used a high-resolution industrial dataset of 106 variables and 64,801 minute-level records collected continuously over a 45-day operational period at a full-scale plant.We developed a comprehensive time-series prediction framework that integrates historical process records with future operating conditions.The predictive performance of representative algorithms—including XGBoost,CatBoost,NLinear,and the Temporal Fusion Transformer(TFT)—was systematically evaluated and validated.Experimental results show that the proposed multi-source time-series prediction framework,which accounts for process dynamics and lag effects,is essential for modeling complex industrial gasification processes.Among the tested models,CatBoost performed best,achieving a mean absolute error(MAE)of 269.17 and a coefficient of determination(R2)of 76.53%.To assess the reliability of these results for production guidance,we compared the framework with a traditional non-temporal cross-sectional baseline model.The baseline attained an R2 of 22.51%and an MAE of 542.20.Thus,the proposed framework improved the R2 by 54.02 percentage points and reduced the MAE by 50.36%,indicating that traditional models fail to capture critical temporal correlations and the delayed response of pollutant generation to control inputs.In contrast,the proposed framework effectively leverages historical inertia and future setpoints to provide robust,actionable insights for industrial regulation.By combining interpretability tools such as SHAP and ALE with process knowledge,we identified the complex nonlinear factors affecting SO2 concentration fluctuations.The interpretability analysis reveals a high sensitivity of emissions to temperature gradients,suggesting that coordinated control of the gasification and combustion stages is key to emission suppression.Specifically,the results indicate that optimizing steam pressure to approximately 0.28 – 0.30 MPa,gasifier outlet temperature to about 100 – 160 ℃,and combustion furnace temperature to about 800 – 900 ℃ can maximize resource recovery while effectively reducing SO2 emissions.In conclusion,by integrating process mechanisms with advanced data-driven analysis,this study achieves precise emission prediction and operational optimization for sludge gasification and provides a generalizable methodology for intelligent modeling of other dynamic industrial systems.

黄强;张欢;曲申

北京理工大学 能源与环境政策研究中心,北京 100081||北京理工大学 管理学院,北京 100081||碳中和系统工程北京实验室,北京 100081北京理工大学 能源与环境政策研究中心,北京 100081||北京理工大学 管理学院,北京 100081||碳中和系统工程北京实验室,北京 100081北京理工大学 能源与环境政策研究中心,北京 100081||北京理工大学 管理学院,北京 100081||碳中和系统工程北京实验室,北京 100081

资源环境

污泥热解气化时序预测机器学习可解释分析实时排放控制

Sludge pyrolysis–gasificationTime-series predictionMachine learningInterpretability analysisReal-time emission control

《能源环境保护》 2026 (2)

102-115,14

国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(52425005)国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(52370189)国家自然科学基金重大资助项目(52595722)

10.20078/j.eep.20260319

评论