手术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征对睡眠结构的影响OA
The impact of surgical treatment on sleep architecture in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome
目的 探讨手术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)对睡眠结构的影响.方法 选取2022年2月~2024年2月就诊于郑州大学第五附属医院耳鼻咽喉科行手术治疗的OSAHS患者75例,术前及术后半年行多导睡眠监测(PSG),应用Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)量表分别评价患者的嗜睡程度和睡眠质量,分析术前和术后睡眠呼吸暂停指标及睡眠结构相关指标的变化,探讨手术治疗OSAHS对睡眠结构的影响.结果 所有患者治疗后呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)明显降低,术前为(27.0±14.1)次/h,术后为(11.6±7.7)次/h;最低血氧饱和度明显提高,术前为(74.0±6.3)%,术后为(82.7±5.7)%,差异均有统计学意义(t=15.358、14.406,P均<0.01).轻度OSAHS组20例,中度OSAHS组25例,重度OSAHS组30例,治疗前ESS及PSQI评分逐渐增加,分别为8.3±2.3、11.0±3.6、13.5±4.7和5.6±2.1、7.5±2.9、9.1±3.2,差异均有统计学意义(F=10.582、9.383,P均<0.05);NI期睡眠逐渐增加,分别为(15.4±1.6)%、(17.3±1.9)%、(19.2±1.8)%,差异有统计学意义(F=26.253,P<0.01);N2期睡眠有增加趋势,分别为(50.3±1.7)%、(51.9±2.3)%、(52.3±2.8)%,差异有统计学意义(F=4.503,P<0.05,其中中度组与重度组变化不明显);N3期睡眠逐渐减少,分别为(15.3±1.4)%、(14.1±1.4)%、(12.8±2.5)%,差异有统计学意义(F=10.147,P<0.01);REM期睡眠逐渐减少,分别为(18.4±1.4)%、(16.6±1.2)%、(15.6±1.5)%,差异有统计学意义(F=36.139,P<0.01).相关分析结果显示,N1期睡眠时间与AHI呈正相关(r=0.563),N3及REM期睡眠时间与AHI呈负相关(r=-0.387、-0.570,P均<0.01).手术治疗后ESS及PSQI评分降低,NI期睡眠明显减少,N2期睡眠有减少趋势,N3期睡眠和REM期睡眠明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 OSAHS患者随病情加重,睡眠结构紊乱情况逐渐加重,手术治疗后浅睡眠期减少,深睡眠期增加,嗜睡症状减轻,睡眠质量明显改善.手术治疗OSAHS可明显改善患者的睡眠结构.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of surgical treatment on sleep architecture in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS).METHODS A total of 75 patients diagnosed with OSAHS who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Otolaryngology,the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February 2022 to February 2024 were selected.Preoperative and six-month postoperative standard polysomnography were performed.The Epworth Sleepiness Scale(ESS)and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)were used to evaluate the patient's level of sleepiness and sleep quality,respectively.Changes in sleep apnea parameters and indicators related to sleep architecture before and after surgery were analyzed to investigate the impact of surgical treatment for OSAHS on sleep architecture.RESULTS Among the 75 cases,20 were mild OSAHS,25 were moderate,and 30 were severe.After treatment,the apnea-hypopnea index(AHI)significantly decreased from(27.0±14.1)times/hour preoperatively to(11.6±7.7)times/hour postoperatively,while the lowest oxygen saturation significantly improved from(74.0±6.3)%preoperatively to(82.7±5.7)%postoperatively,with statistically significant differences(t=15.358 and 14.406,respectively,both P<0.01).Before treatment,the ESS and PSQI scores in the mild,moderate,and severe groups gradually increased,being 8.3±2.3,11.0±3.6,13.5±4.7 and 5.6±2.1,7.5±2.9,9.1±3.2,respectively,with all differences being statistically significant(F=10.582 and 9.383,respectively,both P<0.05).The proportion of N1 stage sleep time gradually increased with disease severity:(15.4±1.6)%,(17.3±1.9)%,and(19.2±1.8)%,respectively(F=26.253,P<0.01).N2 stage sleep showed an increasing trend:(50.3±1.7)%,(51.9±2.3)%,and(52.3±2.8)%,respectively(F=4.503,P<0.05;no significant change between moderate and severe groups).N3 stage sleep progressively decreased:(15.3±1.4)%,(14.1±1.4)%,and(12.8±2.5)%,(F=10.147,P<0.01).REM sleep also declined:(18.4±1.4)%,(16.6±1.2)%,and(15.6±1.5)%,respectively(F=36.139,P<0.01).Correlation analysis revealed that N1 sleep time was positively correlated with AHI(r=0.563),while N3 and REM sleep times were negatively correlated with AHI(r=-0.387 and-0.570,both P<0.01).The ESS and PSQI scores decreased postoperatively,all patients exhibited a significant reduction in N1 sleep,slight decrease in N2 sleep,marked increase in N3 sleep and REM sleep(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION In OSAHS patients,sleep architecture disturbance worsens with disease severity.Surgical treatment reduces light sleep and increases deep sleep,significantly improving sleep structure in patients with OSAHS.
王海威;郝芳;李灏然;周鼎坤;王伟韬
郑州大学第五附属医院耳鼻咽喉一科,河南 郑州 450000郑州大学第五附属医院耳鼻咽喉一科,河南 郑州 450000郑州大学第五附属医院耳鼻咽喉一科,河南 郑州 450000郑州大学第五附属医院耳鼻咽喉一科,河南 郑州 450000郑州大学第五附属医院耳鼻咽喉一科,河南 郑州 450000
外科手术睡眠障碍治疗结果阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征
Surgical Procedures,OperativeSleep DisordersTreatment Outcomeobstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome
《中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科》 2026 (1)
32-35,4
评论