高中生理想水平对抑郁情绪的影响及耐挫力的中介作用:一项前瞻性队列研究OA
Impact of ideal levels on depressive symptoms among high school students and mediating role of frustration tolerance:a prospective cohort study
目的 当前高中生心理健康问题亟待关注,理想水平作为重要的心理品质,其对抑郁情绪的长期影响尚不明确,且耐挫力在二者间的中介作用仍缺乏前瞻性研究证据.本研究以重庆市高中生为对象,探讨理想水平对抑郁情绪的预测作用及耐挫力的中介机制.方法 采用前瞻性队列设计,对重庆市3所中学308名高中生进行3次调查(T1为2024年11月,T2为2025年5月,T3为2025年11月),使用修订版当代青少年理想问卷、学生耐挫心理量表、患者健康问卷分别测量高中生的理想、耐挫力和抑郁情绪水平,对问卷结果进行描述性分析、相关分析、交叉滞后分析,并建立结构方程模型.结果 ①高中生的理想水平较高,总分为(154.28±13.68)分,且一年后变化不显著,耐挫力总分为(61.77±14.39)分,一年后逐步上升至(65.83±15.68)分(P<0.001),抑郁情绪得分为(1.23±2.45)分,一年后显著升高至(4.79±4.33)分(P<0.001);16岁青少年职业理想得分高于15岁群体(P<0.05),男生耐挫力总分高于女生(P<0.01).②理想水平与耐挫力呈正相关(r=0.17~0.30,P<0.01),二者与抑郁情绪均呈负相关(r=-0.23~-0.15,P<0.01).③交叉滞后模型结果显示,理想水平正向预测半年后的耐挫力水平(β=0.10,P<0.01).④耐挫力在理想水平和抑郁情绪得分之间起完全中介作用(β=-0.07,95%CI:-0.19~-0.02,P<0.01),链式中介总间接效应占总效应的8.24%.结论 高中生理想水平可正向预测耐挫力,耐挫力在理想水平与抑郁情绪之间起完全中介作用.建议家-校-社抓住理想形成关键时期加强耐挫力培育,以期降低抑郁情绪,为服务国家战略目标实现奠定基础.
Objective The mental health problems among senior high school students require urgent attention in recent years.Ideal level,as an essential psychological quality,its long-term impact on depressive emotions remains unclear,and the mediating role of frustration tolerance between these 2 factors still lacks prospective evidence.This study aims to determine the predictive effect of ideal level on depressive symptoms and the mediating mechanism of frustration tolerance among high school students in Chongqing.Methods This study adopted a prospective cohort design.A total of 308 high school students from 3 high schools in Chongqing were surveyed at 3 time points:T1(November 2024),T2(May 2025),and T3(November 2025).Revised Contemporary Adolescent Ideal Questionnaire,Frustration Tolerance Scale for Students,and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were used to assess the levels of ideal,frustration tolerance,and depressive symptoms,respectively.Descriptive analysis,correlation analysis,cross-lagged analysis,and structural equation modeling were performed on the questionnaire data.Results ① High school students demonstrated relatively high ideal levels,with a total score of 154.28±13.68,which remained stable over 1 year.The frustration tolerance scores were 61.77±14.39 at baseline and increased progressively to 65.83±15.68 after 1 year(P<0.001).The depressive symptom scores were 1.23±2.45 at baseline and elevated significantly to 4.79±4.33 after 1 year(P<0.001).The career ideal scores were higher in 16-year-old adolescents than in 15-year-old counterparts(P<0.05),and the male students had higher total frustration tolerance scores than the female(P<0.01).② The ideal level was positively correlated with frustration tolerance(r=0.17 to 0.30,P<0.01),and both were negatively correlated with depressive symptoms(r=-0.23 to-0.15,P<0.01).③ The results from the cross-lagged model indicated that ideal level positively predicted frustration tolerance levels at 6 months later(β=0.10,P<0.01).④ Frustration tolerance played a fully mediating role between ideal level and depressive symptom scores(β=-0.07,95%CI:-0.19 to-0.02,P<0.01),with the total indirect effect of the chain mediation accounting for 8.24%of the total effect.Conclusion Ideal level in high school students positively predicts frustration tolerance,and frustration tolerance plays a fully mediating role between ideal level and depressive symptoms.It is recommended that families,schools,and communities seize the critical period of ideal formation to strengthen frustration tolerance training,thereby reducing depressive symptoms and laying a foundation for achieving national strategic goals.
金晨璇;谭洁滢;代宗佩;孙笑笑;周巧宁;向文君;郝维红;戴琴
陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆||联勤保障部队第九二六医院普通外科,云南开远陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系心理训练中心,重庆
社会科学
理想耐挫力抑郁情绪青少年
idealfrustration tolerancedepressive symptomsadolescent
《陆军军医大学学报》 2026 (7)
936-945,10
重庆市社会科学规划项目(2023NDYB94)Supported by the Project of Social Science Plan of Chongqing(2023NDYB94).
评论