数字时代个人信息删除标准的构建OACHSSCD
Constructing standards for personal information deletion in the digital age
数字技术的发展对传统法律概念体系形成结构性挑战,"删除"概念的内涵模糊直接导致个人信息删除标准缺失,给数据合规和司法裁判带来现实困境,影响个人信息删除权的实现.基于比例原则构建相对删除标准,通过动态平衡机制实现法律效果与技术理性的有机统一,成为破解当前困境的可行路径.相对删除标准具有合理性,在理论维度契合比例原则的要求,在实践维度可克服删除的技术壁垒并促进场景化的精准实施,在规范维度则体现扩张解释的可行性.构建删除标准的核心应锚定个人信息的"可识别性",构建"中断识别+风险预防"的双层评估体系:技术层面通过物理删除、匿名化、去标识化、信息封锁等多元删除方式阻断身份识别,达到"中断识别"的实质效果;风险层面建立再识别风险预防机制,通过提高加密强度、禁止识别承诺等措施将风险控制在合理阈值.删除方式的优化选择需要遵循必要性原则和动态平衡原则,一方面通过主体类型化,在未成年人、公众人物、刑满释放的犯罪人员等权利主体和不同规模的义务主体之间选择差异化的删除方式;另一方面通过客体分级化,实现普通信息和敏感信息的区分保护.最终,通过立法规范、司法解释、技术标准等规范形式为实践提供指引,实现个人信息保护和数字经济发展的良性互动.
The innovation of digital technologies poses structural challenges to the traditional conceptual system of law.The ambiguity surrounding the concept of"deletion"has directly led to the absence of clear standards for personal information deletion,creating practical difficulties for data compliance and judicial adjudication and affecting the effective realization of the right to erasure.Constructing a relative deletion standard based on the principle of proportionality,and achieving an organic integration of legal effectiveness and technological rationality through a dynamic balancing mechanism,has become a feasible approach to addressing these challenges.The relative deletion standard is reasonable in multiple respects:theoretically,it conforms to the requirements of the proportionality principle;practically,it can overcome technical barriers to deletion and facilitate precise,scenario-based implementation;normatively,it reflects the feasibility of expansive interpretation.The core of constructing deletion standards should be anchored in the"identifiability"of personal information,establishing a dual-layer evaluation system of"interruption of identification+risk prevention".At the technical level,multiple deletion methods-including physical deletion,anonymization,de-identification,and information blocking-can be adopted to interrupt identity recognition and achieve the substantive effect of"interruption of identification".At the risk level,a re-identification risk prevention mechanism should be established by measures such as enhancing encryption strength and imposing commitments prohibiting re-identification,thereby keeping risks within a reasonable threshold.The optimized selection of deletion methods should follow the principles of necessity and dynamic balance.On the one hand,through subject classification,differentiated deletion approaches should be adopted among rights holders such as minors,public figures,and released offenders,as well as among obligation-bearing entities of different scales.On the other hand,through object classification,differentiated protection should be implemented for ordinary personal information and sensitive personal information.Ultimately,legislative provisions,judicial interpretations,and technical standards should provide guidance for practice,thereby promoting a positive interaction between personal information protection and the development of the digital economy.
项定宜;刘玲伟
东北林业大学 文法学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040东北林业大学 文法学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040
社会科学
个人信息数据删除权匿名化相对删除个人信息删除标准
personal informationdataright to erasureanonymizationrelative deletion standardclear standards for personal information deletion
《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (2)
52-63,12
黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目:数据携带权在黑龙江省的适应性建构研究(25FXE009)黑龙江省法学会一般课题:我国个人数据信托的模式选择与法律架构(HFXH(2025)B07)黑龙江省高教学会课题:习近平法治思想指导下新时代法学教育方法论研究(24GJZXA002)
评论