首页|期刊导航|中医教育|中医药英文论文写作机器翻译质量对比研究

中医药英文论文写作机器翻译质量对比研究OA

A comparative study on the quality of machine translation in English paper writing for traditional Chinese medicine

中文摘要英文摘要

在机器翻译辅助下,中医药英文论文的翻译效率虽有所提高,但译文仍存在诸多不足.研究通过定性、定量对比百度翻译、DeepL、有道翻译和ChatGPT 4.0在处理中医药论文英译中的优劣,并进行全方位质量评估和对比分析,揭示目前应用机器翻译工具辅助中医药英文论文写作时,须重点关注机器翻译工具译文的句式构建、术语英译的准确性和规范性,以及源自中医古籍的文言表达等问题.同时,在译后编辑过程中,应使用多种工具,并参照权威中医药英译国际标准及权威英译本,以确保英文翻译的规范性和准确性.

The writing of English papers on Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)with the assistance of machine translation improves the efficiency of English translation,but there are still many deficiencies in the translated texts.This study qualitatively and quantitatively compares the advantages and disadvantages of Baidu Translate,DeepL,Youdao Translate,and ChatGPT 4.0 in handling the English translation of TCM papers,through comprehensive quality evaluation and comparative analysis,it reveals that attention should be focused on issues such as the sentence structure construction of the translated texts of machine translation tools,the accuracy and standardization of the English translation of terms,and the classical Chinese expressions derived from ancient TCM books.At the same time,multiple tools and authoritative international standards for the English translation of TCM should be used to ensure the standardization and accuracy of the English translation in the post-editing process.

邵英俊;张烁;孔祥国;熊淋宵

北京中医药大学人文学院 北京 102488北京中医药大学人文学院 北京 102488北京中医药大学人文学院 北京 102488北京中医药大学人文学院 北京 102488

社会科学

机器翻译中医药英文论文写作译文质量评估

machine translationTCM English paper writingtranslation quality evaluation

《中医教育》 2026 (3)

1-8,8

教育部产学合作协同育人项目(No.231101339071101)北京中医药大学社科培育课题(No.2024-JYB-900208-011)

10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2026.03.366

评论