中药化学成分神经毒性预测定量构效关系模型构建OA
Construction of a Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model for Neurotoxicity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chemical Components Prediction
目的 构建预测中药化学成分神经毒性的定量构效关系(QSAR)模型,用于中药化学成分潜在神经毒性的预测.方法 从Toxicity Reference Database(ToxRefDB)和Side Effect Resource(SIDER)数据库及文献中共收集1 769种具有神经毒性的化合物和596种不具有神经毒性的化合物作为构建QSAR模型的训练集,应用RDkit 2022.09.5 软件包计算、筛选分子描述符,使用K-Nearest Neighbors、Naive Bayes、Random Forest、XGBoos、Artificial Neural Network五种算法分别构建QSAR模型,通过10折交叉验证方法进行内部验证选择最优模型.通过查阅文献及数据库共收集11种具有神经毒性和13种不具有神经毒性的中药化学成分作为外部验证集,评价所建QSAR模型对于中药化学成分神经毒性预测的适用性.结果 经过内、外部验证,五种算法中Random Forest和ANN在正负例的平衡识别方面表现突出.在所有药物中,ANN模型预测准确16个,预测错误8个,Random Forest模型预测准确17个,预测错误7个,二者预测准确率均为65%以上.结论 应用Random Forest或ANN算法构建的模型预测能力要优于K-Nearest Neighbors、Naive Bayes和XGBoos算法构建的模型,通过已知毒性的中药化学成分验证表明,此QSAR模型有良好的灵敏度和预测准确率,可以用于中药化学成分神经毒性的预测.
Objective To construct a quantitative structure-activity relationship(QSAR)model for predicting the potential neurotoxicity of traditional Chinese medicine chemical components.Methods A total of 1 769 compounds with neurotoxicity and 596 compounds without neurotoxicity were collected from the Toxicity Reference Database(ToxRefDB),Side Effect Resource(SIDER)databases and literature,to constitute the training set for QSAR model construction.The RDkit 2022.09.5 software package was used to calculate and screen molecular descriptors.Five algorithms including K-Nearest Neighbors,Naive Bayes,Random Forest,XGBoos and Artificial Neural Network,were employed to construct QSAR models,and internal validation was performed using a 10 fold cross validation method to select the optimal model.11 compounds with neurotoxicity and 13 compounds without neurotoxicity were collected as external validation sets by consulting literature and databases.This set was used to evaluate the applicability of the developed QSAR model for predicting traditional Chinese medicine chemical components neurotoxicity.Results After internal and external verification,Random Forest and ANN performed outstandingly in the balanced recognition of positive and negative examples among the five algorithms.Among all drugs,the ANN model correctly predicted 16 instances and incorrectly predicted 8.The Random Forest model accurately predicted 17 and incorrectly predicted 7,with both models achieved a prediction accuracy of over 65%.Conclusion The predictive ability of models constructed using Random Forest or ANN algorithms is superior to those constructed using K-Nearest Neighbors,Naive Bayes,and XGBoos algorithms.Validation of known toxic traditional Chinese medicine chemical components shows that this QSAR model has good sensitivity and prediction accuracy,indicating its applicability for predicting the neurotoxicity of traditional Chinese medicine chemical components.
凌霄;李春晓;李学林
河南中医药大学第一附属医院,河南 郑州 450000||河南省中药临床应用评价与转化工程研究中心,河南 郑州 450000||河南省中药临床药学中医药重点实验室,河南 郑州 450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院,河南 郑州 450000||河南省中药临床应用评价与转化工程研究中心,河南 郑州 450000||河南省中药临床药学中医药重点实验室,河南 郑州 450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院,河南 郑州 450000||河南省中药临床应用评价与转化工程研究中心,河南 郑州 450000||河南省中药临床药学中医药重点实验室,河南 郑州 450000
神经毒性定量构效关系人工神经网络
NeurotoxicityQuantitative structure-activity relationshipArtificial neural network
《中医药信息》 2026 (4)
18-23,6
河南省中医药拔尖人才培养项目(2022ZYBJ05)郑州市医疗卫生领域科技创新指导计划项目(2024YLZDJH081)
评论