省级突发地质灾害应急预案的量化评价与区域差异研究OA
Quantitative Evaluation and Regional Differences in Provincial Government Emergency Response Plans for Sudden Geological Disasters in China
为科学评估省级突发地质灾害应急预案内容的完备性,该文以全国28份省级预案为样本,引入政策一致性(PMC)指数模型,构建包含9个一级指标、56个二级指标的应急预案评价体系,对样本预案进行评估和系统比较.结果表明:①我国省级突发地质灾害应急预案PMC指数均值为7.15,整体质量良好,但存在"重应急处置、轻预防恢复、弱动态管理"的结构性失衡;②依风险等级划分,高风险省区预案PMC均值(7.31)显著高于中低风险省区(7.00),其优势集中在预警响应、后期处置等"实战型"维度;而中低风险省区预案在总体要求、预案管理等"程序性"维度上表现更佳.据此,提出补齐共性短板、发挥比较优势和迈向未来形态的预案优化路径,为政府完善应急预案提供决策支撑.
The completeness and scientific rigor of provincial-level emergency response plans for sudden geological disasters serve as the institutional cornerstone for regional disaster resilience.However,existing research often overlooks the content characteristics and regional variations of these critical documents.To address this gap,a mixed-method ap-proach combining text mining with the Policy Modeling Consistency(PMC)index model is employed to systematically evaluate 28 effective provincial emergency response plans in China.Utilizing ROST CM6 software,high-frequency key-words are extracted to construct an objective evaluation system comprising 9 primary indicators(e.g.,Early Warning,Emergency Disposal)and 56 secondary indicators.The results indicate:①The average PMC index is 7.15,reflecting generally sound textual quality.However,a significant structural imbalance exists:while plans excel in"Emergency Dis-posal"(X6),they are notably weak in"Post-disaster Recovery"(X7)and"Plan Management"(X9),specifically lack-ing institutionalized mechanisms for assessment and revision.②There is significant regional heterogeneity rooted in a"Dual-Drive"mechanism:High-risk provinces(e.g.,Sichuan,Yunnan)exhibit a significantly higher average PMC(7.31),driven by"Risk-Experience"derived from repeated real-world combat,thus excelling in practical dimensions like early warning response.Conversely,high-governance provinces(e.g.,Beijing,Shanghai)are driven by"Governance-Norms",outperforming in procedural dimensions like organizational command due to superior administra-tive standardization.Consequently,an optimization mechanism integrating"Scientific Logic"and"Practical Inspec-tion"is proposed.Specific strategies include establishing a closed-loop for plan revision and adopting a"Modular+Scenario-based"architecture,which consists of a stable"Core Master Plan"for normative guidance and dynamic"Sce-nario Action Manuals"for tactical flexibility.These findings provide theoretical support and actionable guidance for local governments to enhance both the theoretical rigor and practical operability of emergency plans.
郭海湘;郑润杰;何欣宇;代姗姗
中国地质大学(武汉) 经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430078||中国地质大学(武汉) 自然灾害风险防控与应急管理实验室,湖北 武汉 430074中国地质大学(武汉) 经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430078||中国地质大学(武汉) 自然灾害风险防控与应急管理实验室,湖北 武汉 430074中国地质大学(武汉) 经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430078||中国地质大学(武汉) 自然灾害风险防控与应急管理实验室,湖北 武汉 430074中国地质大学(武汉) 经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430078||中国地质大学(武汉) 自然灾害风险防控与应急管理实验室,湖北 武汉 430074||中国地质大学(武汉) 内蒙古研究院,湖北 武汉 430074
资源环境
地质灾害应急预案政策一致性(PMC)指数量化评价区域差异
geological disastersemergency response plansPolicy Consistency(PMC)indexquantitative evaluationregional differences
《灾害学》 2026 (2)
30-37,8
国家社会科学基金重点项目"新时代公共安全应急框架体系研究"(23AZD072)湖北省自然科学基金创新群体项目"复合链生灾害致灾机制与综合风险防控体系研究"(2024AFA015)国家自然科学基金面上项目"山区复合链生灾害风险评估与应急处置研究"(42571359)国家社会科学基金后期资助项目"多灾种视角下区域自然灾害耦合风险测度与韧性治理研究"(25FGLB018)湖南省自然科学基金联合基金重点项目"城市内涝致灾机制与综合风险数智化防控体系研究"(2026JJ30054)
评论