首页|期刊导航|浙江大学学报(医学版)|合并大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中患者超过24至72h机械取栓的有效性及安全性

合并大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中患者超过24至72h机械取栓的有效性及安全性OA

Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy beyond 24 to 72 hours in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:评估超过24 h机械取栓(以下简称取栓)治疗合并大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者的有效性和安全性.方法:采用回顾性队列研究设计,纳入2017年1月至2024年12月登记于急性卒中质量评估与管理在线数据库(来源于CASE-Ⅱ研究,NCT04487340)中发病72 h内接受取栓的合并大血管闭塞AIS患者,并根据取栓时间分为超过24 h取栓组和24 h内取栓组.采用倾向评分匹配平衡组间差异,采用二元logistic回归模型和一般线性模型比较两组3个月神经功能及安全性事件差异.分别选择非常规时间窗(6~24 h)取栓患者和单纯取栓(未行静脉溶栓)患者进行敏感性分析,并根据年龄、有无心房颤动史、有无口服抗凝药物史、入院前改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分和血管闭塞部分进行亚组分析.结果:最终共纳入患者9121例,其中超过24 h取栓组277例,24 h内取栓组8844例.倾向评分匹配后最终纳入534例,超过24 h取栓组和24 h内取栓组各267例.倾向评分匹配前后,两组3个月神经功能独立(mRS评分0~2分)的比例差异均无统计学意义(分别为OR=0.977,95%CI:0.753~1.268,P=0.861和OR=1.151,95%CI:0.712~1.549,P=0.804).两组术后24 h症状性颅内出血、24 h脑实质出血和3个月全因死亡率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).敏感性分析结果显示,在非常规时间窗取栓和单纯取栓患者中,两组间3个月神经功能和安全性事件差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).临床特征亚组分析3个月神经功能独立的比例差异也无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论:合并大血管闭塞AIS患者超过24 h取栓的有效性和安全性与24 h内取栓相近.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy performed beyond 24 hours from symptom onset in patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS)and large vessel occlusion(LVO).Methods:In this retrospective cohort study,patients with LVO-related AIS who underwent mechanical thrombectomy within 72 hours of onset were enrolled from the Acute Stroke Patients for Stroke Management Quality Evaluation online database(CASE-Ⅱ,NCT04487340)between January 2017 and December 2024.Patients were stratified into beyond 24-hour thrombectomy group and within 24-hour thrombectomy group based on the time from onset to mechanical thrombectomy.Propensity score matching(PSM)was used to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups.Binary logistic regression and generalized linear models were employed to compare 3-month functional and safety outcomes between the groups.Sensitivity analyses were conducted separately in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy within the extended time window(6-24 hours)and in those receiving mechanical thrombectomy alone(without prior intravenous thrombolysis).Subgroup analyses were performed based on age,presence of atrial fibrillation,use of oral anticoagulants,pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score,baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)score,and occlusion site.Results:Of the 9121 patients included,277 underwent mechanical thrombectomy beyond 24 hours and 8844 within 24 hours.After PSM,534 patients were analyzed(267 per group).No significant difference was found in the rate of 3-month functional independence(mRS score 0-2)between the beyond 24-hour and within 24-hour thrombectomy groups,both before and after matching(OR=0.977,95%CI:0.753-1.268,P=0.861;OR=1.151,95%CI:0.712-1.549,P=0.804,respectively).The rates of 24-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage,24-hour parenchymal hemorrhage,and 3-month all-cause mortality also showed no significant differences between the two groups(all P>0.05).Sensitivity analyses among patients in the extended time window(6-24 hours)and those receiving mechanical thrombectomy alone yielded similar results,with no significant differences in functional or safety outcomes(all P>0.05).Subgroup analyses revealed no significant heterogeneity in the 3-month functional independence across various baseline characteristics(all P>0.05).Conclusion:For AIS patients with LVO,the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy performed beyond 24 hours appear comparable to those of mechanical thrombectomy performed within 24 hours.

江选飞;陈逸;金海娣;霍鑫龙;林青;王恩;涂汉明;楼敏;张冰

湖州市中心医院神经内科,浙江 湖州 313000浙江大学医学院附属第二医院神经内科,浙江 杭州 310009浙江大学医学院附属第二医院神经内科,浙江 杭州 310009温岭市第一人民医院神经内科,浙江 台州 317500台州市第一人民医院神经内科,浙江 台州 318020台州医院神经内科,浙江 台州 317000永康市第一人民医院神经内科,浙江 金华 321300浙江大学医学院附属第二医院神经内科,浙江 杭州 310009湖州市中心医院神经内科,浙江 湖州 313000

医药卫生

急性缺血性脑卒中大血管闭塞机械取栓超时间窗临床结局安全性回顾性研究

Acute ischemic strokeLarge vessel occlusionMechanical thrombectomyExtended time windowClinical outcomeSafetyRetrospective study

《浙江大学学报(医学版)》 2026 (2)

113-120,8

国家自然科学基金(82171276,U23A20426)国家卫生健康委医药卫生科技发展研究中心脑卒中防治技术研究项目(WKZX2023CZ0220)浙江省自然科学基金(LTGY24H090004)浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2023XY068)湖州市公益性技术应用研究(2018GYB07)This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171276,U23A20426),Research Project on Prevention and Treatment Techniques for Stroke of the Development Center for Medical Science & Technology,National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China (WKZX2023CZ0220),Zhejiang Provincial National Natural Science Foundation of China (LTGY24H090004),Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (2023XY068),and Public Welfare Technology Application Research of Huzhou (2018GYB07)

10.3724/zdxbyxb-2025-0556

评论