能耗双控转向碳排放双控的法制进路及法典因应OA
Legal pathways and the Ecological and Environmental Code's response to the transition from dual energy control to dual carbon control
从能耗双控转向碳排放双控是中国为加快生态文明建设、精准推动碳达峰碳中和、实现能源绿色低碳转型的重要制度安排.中国加快规划建设新型能源体系,可再生能源比例逐年提升,能耗双控在限制化石能源消耗的同时也约束了可再生能源发展,其对能源品类进行无差别限制的局限性日益凸显.因此,要实现能源结构稳妥有序转型,须深刻理解"能-碳"协同治理的法制逻辑.适逢《中华人民共和国能源法》颁行,《中华人民共和国生态环境法典(草案)》已完成第二次审议,两法均明确提出"建立能源消耗总量和强度双控向碳排放总量和强度双控全面转型新机制".然而,"双控"规则体系仍呈现碎片化问题,当下进行"立改废释"的"政策法律化"时机已经成熟,其中法律规则衔接和法制体系整合是破题关键.能耗双控与碳排放双控具有承前启后的内在联系,二者是中国推动能源转型和应对气候变化过程中实施的两种不同控制策略,前者为后者的实施奠定了重要的制度基础.首先,在制度供给层面,应本着平稳推进的原则,跨越能耗双控的制度惯性障碍;依循目标分解的方法,突破科层式的府际关系局限;秉持理念升级的思路,发挥市场的主导作用.其次,在规则衔接场域,须先清理与碳排放双控不相适应的法律规则体系,同时夯实与之相匹配的碳排放统计核算基础,进而统合"有为政府"与"有效市场"的协同调控体系.最后,应把握生态环境法典编纂契机,结合"绿色低碳发展编"的篇章体例,整合"双碳"立法体系、嵌入"双控"基本原则、搭建"三层级"立法构造,实现碳排放双控从政策话语向法制话语的转化.
The shift from control of total energy consumption and intensity(dual energy control)to control of the amount and intensity of carbon emissions(dual carbon control)represents a pivotal institutional framework aimed at accelerating China's ecological civiliza-tion construction,promoting the achievement of the country's goals of reaching peak carbon emissions and carbon neutrality,and realiz-ing green and low-carbon transformation.As China accelerates the planning and construction of a new energy system with an annually increasing proportion of renewable energy,the traditional dual energy control mechanism—while curbing fossil fuel consumption—has also constrained renewable energy development due to its indiscriminate limitations on all energy categories.Therefore,achieving a steady and orderly energy transition requires a profound understanding of the legal logic underlying coordinated energy-carbon gover-nance.With the promulgation of the Energy Law of the People's Republic of China and the completion of the second deliberation of the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People's Republic of China(Draft),both legal documents explicitly propose"establishing a new mechanism for the comprehensive transition from control of total energy consumption and intensity to control of the amount and in-tensity of carbon emissions."However,the fragmented"dual control"regulatory framework now calls for legalization of policies through legislation,revisions,abolition,and interpretation,with the alignment of legal rules and the integration of the legal system being key to resolving these systemic challenges.Dual energy control and dual carbon control are intrinsically connected,serving as successive strat-egies in China's efforts to promote energy transition and address climate change,with the former laying a crucial institutional foundation for the implementation of the latter.First,at the level of institutional supply,it is necessary to uphold the principle of steady progress to overcome the institutional inertia associated with dual energy control;adopt the approach of target decomposition to transcend the hier-archical inter-governmental relationships;and uphold the mindset of conceptual upgrading to fully leverage the leading role of the mar-ket.Second,in the scenario of rule alignment,legal rules incompatible with dual carbon control must be phased out,while concurrently establishing the foundational infrastructure for carbon emission statistical accounting.This will facilitate the integration of a coordinated regulatory structure involving a capable government and an efficient market.Finally,the opportunity presented by the compilation of the Ecological and Environmental Code should be seized.By combining the structure of the"Green and Low-carbon Development"section,integrating the"dual carbon"legislative framework,embedding the fundamental principles of"dual control,"and constructing a"three-tier"legislative structure,the transition of dual carbon control from policy discourse to legal discourse can be realized.
冀鹏飞
中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北 武汉 430074
社会科学
能耗双控碳排放双控能源法生态环境法典
control of total energy consumption and intensitycontrol of the amount and intensity of carbon emissionsEnergy LawEcological and Environmental Code
《中国人口·资源与环境》 2026 (2)
74-85,12
国家社会科学基金重大专项"生态环境法典化的中国实践和理论创新研究"(批准号:24ZDA095)中央高校基本科研业务费项目"'双碳'目标下碳补偿机制的法治创新研究"(批准号:2722023BQ029).
评论