乡村数字治理的类型化路径研究OA
Research on Typological Pathways for Rural Digital Governance
乡村数字治理转型直接关系到国家治理效能的提升,更是推进乡村治理现代化、落实乡村振兴战略的重要支撑.2018年中央一号文件首次明确"数字乡村战略"后,各地纷纷将数字技术引入乡村治理实践,但在推进过程中,"赛马"式比拼导致数字治理逐渐偏离初衷.上级考核重心偏向数字技术的数量与表面创新,忽视实际赋能效果,进而催生了数字负担、数字悬浮、数字形式主义等问题.当前学界针对这些问题提出了诸多应对策略,但结合实地调研发现,现有研究大多未能触及问题根源,即基层治理中"一刀切"式的数字技术刚性嵌入,忽视了我国乡村的差异性,导致数字技术与乡村实际需求脱节,难以实现有效赋能.基于此,本文结合2025年7-8月对福建省多处乡村的实地观察、村民访谈,以及其他省份乡村的数字治理实践典型案例,从类型学视角出发,依据常住群体、产业结构、地理位置、经济水平、教育水平、社会形态、城镇化程度七大特征,将我国乡村划分为传统型、发展型、发达型3类,并梳理各类乡村的数字治理需求与实践困境.在此基础上,针对性提出适配3类乡村的数字治理模式:传统型乡村采用弱数字治理模式,发展型乡村推行渐进式数字治理模式,发达型乡村实施强数字治理模式,以期破解当前乡村数字治理的现实难题,实现数字技术对乡村治理的有效赋能,稳步推进乡村治理现代化转型.
The transformation of rural digital governance is directly related to enhancing national governance efficiency,and it also serves as a crucial underpinning for advancing the modernization of rural governance and implementing the rural revitalization strategy.Since the"Digital Countryside Strategy"was first explicitly proposed in the Central No.1 Document in 2018,various regions have successively introduced digital technologies into rural governance practices.However,in the process of advancement,the"horse-race"-style competition has led digital governance to gradually deviate from its original purpose.Higher-level assessments have focused more on the quantity and superficial innovation of digital technologies while neglecting their actual empowerment effects,which in turn has given rise to issues such as digital burden,digital alienation,and digital formalism.Academic circles have put forward numerous countermeasures to address these problems,but field research reveals that most existing studies have failed to touch the root cause.The core issue lies in the rigid,"one-size-fits-all"embedding of digital technologies in grassroots governance,which overlooks the inherent differences among rural areas in China.This mismatch between digital technologies and the actual needs of rural communities hinders effective governance empowerment.Based on field observations,interviews with villagers in multiple rural areas of Fujian Province(conducted from July to August 2025),and practical cases of typical rural areas in other provinces,this study adopts a typological perspective.It classifies Chinese rural areas into three categories—traditional,developing,and developed—based on seven core characteristics:resident population,industrial structure,geographical location,economic level,educational attainment,social form,and degree of urbanization.Subsequently,it sorts out the digital governance needs and practical dilemmas of each type.On this basis,the study proposes targeted digital governance models for the three types of rural areas:a weak digital governance model for traditional rural areas,a gradual digital governance model for developing rural areas,and a strong digital governance model for developed rural areas.These models aim to resolve the practical challenges in current rural digital governance,realize the effective empowerment of digital technologies in rural governance,and steadily promote the modernization of rural governance.
程书一;张富利
浙江理工大学法学与人文学院,浙江 杭州 310018广西师范大学法学院,广西桂林 541000
社会科学
乡村数字治理类型化治理乡村分类治理模式数字赋能
rural digital governancetypological governancevillage classificationgovernance modelsdigital empowerment
《重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (2)
32-45,14
福建省哲学社会科学重点项目"数字法治政府建设研究"(FJ2023MGCA041).
评论