我国城市历史街区公共化实践逻辑与研究进展OACHSSCD

As core carriers of urban cultural genes,urban historic districts are integral to preserving China's history and culture.Publicization has come to play a significant role in both conservation and research during urban stock renewal.Yet systematic literature reviews that synthesize research and trace evolutionary trends in this field remain scarce.This study bridges theory and practice by demonstrating,from the perspective of practical challenges,how publicization of urban historic districts aligns with renewal goals,sustainable development,and the mitigation of public identity crises.The study identifies three practical aspects of publicization:activating public values at the urban scale,expanding stakeholder participation at the district scale,and fostering spatial accessibility at the public scale. After retrieving relevant studies from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)database,the research used CiteSpace software to analyze publicization in historic districts.Based on this analysis,relevant studies were further screened according to the core principles of"active protection and integrated innovation"advocated by Wu Liangyong.Research progress on the publicization of historic districts in China was then divided into three themes.First,publicization of values:1)the introduction of ideas such as resilience and sustainability,and the theoretical reconstruction of the humanistic revitalization of historic communities;2)value assessment,including the construction of spatiotemporal composite evaluation systems and focal issues such as social impact assessment(SIA).Second,publicization of objects:1)construction and translation of spatial publicity,including the evaluation of the relationship between publicity and commercial elements,and the measurement and regulation of publicity-oriented commercial suitability;2)expansion of the public dimension in renewal governance,involving the publicization of governance goals at the cognitive and implementation end;3)measurement and regulation of public space vitality,with research focusing on influencing factors,vitality characterization and measurement,and increased applications of big data.Third,publicization of subjects:1)differential characteristics of subjects:exploring the similarities and differences in subjective perceptions and rights relationships among various stakeholders,with the original inhabitants and tourists analyzed the most deeply;2)mechanisms for subject participation:public participation involves multiple subjects,so research in the heritage field focuses on concepts,subjects,and mechanisms.Studies specifically on public participation in historic districts are limited,with discussion focusing on procedural roles and implementation frameworks. Finally,three key directions for future studies are proposed in accordance with practical needs and research status:1)refinement of the theoretical framework of publicization and enhancement of the value evaluation system;2)multidimensional analysis of spatial publicity and demonstration of governance strategies and mechanisms;and 3)in-depth research into subject differentiation and mechanisms for subject participation.This study aims to provide insights into the practical and theoretical publicization of urban historic districts in China.