不同种植密度对迷你花型切花菊生长发育和品质的影响OA
Effects of different planting densities on development and quality of mini-cut chrysanthemum
[目的]本文旨在探索迷你花型切花菊的适宜种植管理条件,提高土地利用率及增加收益,最终实现优质生产及该品种的推广应用.[方法]选择云南基地 2 个不同生产批次迷你花型切花菊品种'星河紫',设置 80 株·m-2(CK)、100 株·m-2(D1)、123 株·m-2(D2)和156 株·m-2(D3)4 个种植密度,测定不同生长阶段的株高、茎粗、鲜重、叶片数、叶面积、分枝数、分枝角度、花蕾数、花径、瓶插寿命等指标,并通过层次分析法综合评估不同种植密度对切花品质的影响,同时,比较光、温条件不同的 2 个批次(S1、S2)切花品质的差异.[结果]迷你花型切花菊'星河紫'的茎粗、鲜重、花蕾数、叶片数和叶面积随种植密度增加呈先升后降趋势,均以D1 处理最高、D3 处理最低,其中D1 处理的鲜重、花蕾数显著高于CK和其他处理,茎粗、叶片数和叶面积则与CK无显著差异.切花菊的株高、分枝数、分枝角度、花径均以CK最高,随密度增加处理呈一直下降趋势,但各处理的株高与CK无显著差异;D1 处理的分枝数和花径与CK、D2 处理无显著差异,但显著高于D3 处理;D1处理的分枝角度和CK无显著差异,但显著高于D2 和D3 处理;各处理与CK的叶部和花部瓶插寿命均无显著差异.通过层次分析法综合评价各项品质指标,切花的综合品质随种植密度增加呈先上升后下降的趋势,其中D1 处理的综合评价得分最高,为 2.303,观赏品质最优,CK次之,D3 处理最差,得分仅为 1.526.第 1 批次(S1)日平均温度低于第 2 批次(S2),而S1 光照条件更优,累计光合有效辐射也高于S2.2 个批次不同密度处理的切花品质存在差异,S1 的低密度CK处理的综合评价得分低于S2,而种植密度较高的其他处理组则均为S1高于S2.[结论]'星河紫'合理种植密度范围为 80~123 株·m-2,其中 100 株·m-2可获得最佳的品质和产量的综合效益.35℃以上高温对高密度种植的切花菊品质抑制明显.云南地区温度偏高(35℃以上)时建议选择 80~100 株·m-2的种植密度,而温度较低时可适当提高种植密度至 123 株·m-2.
[Objectives]The paper aimed to explore suitable planting management conditions,improve land utilization and increase income,and ultimately achieve high-quality production of mini-cut chrysanthemum and the promotion of this variety.[Methods]This study investigated the effects of four planting densities:80 plants·m-2(CK),100 plants·m-2(D1),123 plants·m-2(D2),and 156 plants·m-2(D3)on quality of mini-cut chrysanthemum variety'Xinghezi'across two production batches with light and temperature variations(S1 and S2)in Yunnan Province.The indexes of plant height,stem diameter,fresh weight,leaf number,leaf area,branch number,branch angle,flower bud number,flower diameter and vase life at different growth stages were measured.The comprehensive evaluation used the analytic hierarchy process(AHP).[Results]The stem diameter,fresh weight,bud number,leaf number and leaf area of mini-cut chrysanthemum'Xinghezi'increased first and then decreased with the increase of planting density,with the highest in D1 treatment and the lowest in D3 treatment.Fresh weight and bud number in D1 treatment were significantly higher than CK and other treatments,while stem diameter,leaf number,and leaf area showed no significant differences compared to CK.Plant height,branch number,branch angle,and flower diameter of mini-cut chrysanthemum were the highest in CK and declined with the increase of planting density.Plant height showed no significant differences between treatments and CK.Branch number and flower diameter in D1 treatment were comparable to CK and D2 treatment but significantly higher than D3 treatment.Branch angle in D1 treatment was similar to CK but significantly larger than D2 and D3 treatments.Vase life and leaf quality remained consistent across all treatments.AHP analysis revealed that comprehensive score followed a rise-then-decline trend with the increase of planting density,with D1 treatment achieving the highest score(2.303),followed by CK,and D3 treatment scoring the lowest(1.526).The average daily temperature of S1 was lower than that of S2,while the light conditions of S1 were better,and the cumulative photosynthetically active radiation was also higher.There were differences in the quality of mini-cut chrysanthemum between two batches of different density treatments.The comprehensive score of CK during S1 was lower,while the other treatment groups with higher planting density were higher than S2.[Conclusions]The optimal planting density range for'Xinghezi'was 80-123 plants·m-2,with 100 plants·m-2 providing the best balance of yield and quality.High temperatures significantly impair quality in high-density cultivation.In Yunnan region,lower densities(80-100 plants·m-2)were recommended during hot summers,while 123 plants·m-2 might be adopted under moderate temperatures.
谷昱;房伟民;陈发棣;蒋甲福;张飞;王振兴
南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新利用全国重点实验室/农业农村部景观农业重点实验室/园艺学院,江苏 南京 211800南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新利用全国重点实验室/农业农村部景观农业重点实验室/园艺学院,江苏 南京 211800南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新利用全国重点实验室/农业农村部景观农业重点实验室/园艺学院,江苏 南京 211800南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新利用全国重点实验室/农业农村部景观农业重点实验室/园艺学院,江苏 南京 211800南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新利用全国重点实验室/农业农村部景观农业重点实验室/园艺学院,江苏 南京 211800南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新利用全国重点实验室/农业农村部景观农业重点实验室/园艺学院,江苏 南京 211800
农业科技
切花菊观赏品质农艺性状种植密度光温差异综合评价
cut chrysanthemumornamental qualityagronomic traitsplanting densitylight-temperature differencescomprehensive evaluation
《南京农业大学学报》 2026 (2)
270-279,10
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFD2300900)江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目[CX(22)2033]
评论