2019-2024年慢性HBV感染患者恩替卡韦耐药突变谱演变及其临床意义OA
The evolution of entecavir resistance mutation spectrum in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection from 2019 to 2024 and its clinical implications
目的 分析2019-2024年临床慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染患者恩替卡韦(ETV)基因型耐药突变检出特征,以期揭示ETV耐药模式的转变规律,为临床合理抗病毒治疗提供依据.方法 收集2019年7月-2024年6月在解放军总医院第五医学中心接受HBV耐药突变检测及核苷(酸)类似物(NAs)治疗的4697例慢性HBV感染患者进行回顾性分析;根据是否检出ETV耐药基因突变,将患者分为ETV耐药突变组(n=547)与无ETV突变组(n=4150).从患者血清中提取病毒基因组,采用单管巢式PCR方法扩增HBV反转录酶(RT)区,分析NAs耐药相关位点的突变情况;结合临床资料,采用logistic回归分析耐药相关危险因素.结果 在4697例患者中,547例(11.6%)检出ETV耐药基因突变.ETV耐药突变主要出现在既往接受过NAs治疗的患者中,以拉米夫定(LAM)→ETV序贯治疗(66.5%)和LAM→阿德福韦酯(ADV)→ETV治疗(20.0%)为主.在检测到的59种ETV耐药突变模式中,基于rtS202位点的突变最常见,共302例(55.2%);基于rtT184位点的突变共233例(42.6%),基于rtM250位点的突变共71例(13.0%).ETV耐药突变组的男性比例、年龄、谷丙转氨酶、HBV DNA载量、HBeAg阳性率、HBV基因C型、肝硬化及LAM治疗史的比例均明显高于无ETV突变组(P<0.05).多因素分析结果显示,年龄≥45岁、HBeAg阳性、HBV DNA≥3.0 log10 IU/ml、HBV基因C型、肝硬化及LAM治疗史是ETV耐药突变的独立危险因素.在184例接受基于富马酸替诺福韦(TDF)/富马酸丙酚替诺福韦(TAF)挽救治疗的随访患者中,48周时有148例(80.4%)实现病毒学应答,其中接受TAF+聚乙二醇干扰素α(PEG IFN-α)的2例患者实现HBeAg血清学转换.结论 ETV作为当前指南推荐的一线核苷类强效口服抗病毒药物,其临床耐药突变模式正在演变为以rtS202G+rtL180M+rtM204V突变为主.年龄较大、HBeAg阳性、HBV DNA高载量、HBV基因C型、肝硬化及LAM治疗史为ETV耐药突变主要危险因素.针对ETV耐药患者,基于TDF/TAF+PEG IFN-α的挽救治疗可能是实现功能治愈的有效方案.
Objective To analyze the detection characteristics of entecavir(ETV)genotypic resistance mutations in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection from 2019 to 2024,aiming to elucidate the evolving patterns of ETV resistance and provide a basis for rational clinical antiviral therapy.Methods A total of 4697 chronic HBV-infected patients who underwent HBV resistance mutation testing and received nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs)treatment at the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital between July 2019 and July 2024 were included in this retrospective study.Based on the detection of ETV resistance mutations,patients were divided into ETV-resistance mutation group(n=547)and non-ETV resistance mutation group(n=4150).Viral genomes were extracted from serum,and the HBV reverse transcriptase(RT)gene region was amplified using single-tube nested PCR,followed by Sanger sequencing to analyze NAs resistance-associated mutations.Clinical data were analyzed using logistic regression to identify risk factors for ETV resistance.Results ETV resistance mutations were detected in 547(11.6%)of the 4697 patients.These mutations were predominantly found in patients with prior NAs therapy,mainly those receiving lamivudine(LAM)-to-ETV sequential therapy(66.5%)or LAM-to-adefovir(ADV)-to-ETV therapy(20.0%).Among the 59 detected ETV resistance mutation patterns,mutations involving the rtS202 site were the most common(302 cases,55.2%),followed by those involving the rtT184 site(233 cases,42.6%),and the rtM250 site(71 cases,13.0%).Compared with non-ETV resistance mutation group,ETV-resistance mutation group had a significantly higher proportion of males,older age,elevated alanine aminotransferase(ALT)levels,higher HBV DNA loads,higher HBeAg positivity rate,higher prevalence of HBV genotype C,cirrhosis,and a history of LAM therapy(P<0.05).Multivariable analysis identified age≥45 years,HBeAg positivity,HBV DNA≥3.0 log10 IU/ml,HBV genotype C,cirrhosis,and prior LAM therapy as independent risk factors for ETV resistance.Among the 184 patients who received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)/tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)-based rescue therapy and were followed up,148(80.4%)achieved virological response at week 48.Notably,two patients receiving a TAF+pegylated interferon α(PEG IFN-α)regimen achieved HBeAg seroconversion.Conclusions As a first-line potent oral nucleoside antiviral drug recommended by current guidelines,the clinical resistance pattern of ETV is evolving,with the rtS202G+rtL180M+rtM204V mutation combination becoming predominant.Older age,HBeAg positivity,high HBV DNA load,HBV genotype C,cirrhosis,and prior LAM therapy are key risk factors.For ETV-resistant patients,rescue therapy based on TDF/TAF in combination with PEG IFN-α may be an effective strategy to achieve a functional cure.
李旭阳;思兰兰;李乐;贺梦雯;陈雪媛;姚增涛;王春艳;纪冬;刘妍
北京大学三〇二临床医学院,北京 100039解放军总医院感染病医学部,北京 100039解放军总医院感染病医学部,北京 100039北京大学三〇二临床医学院,北京 100039解放军总医院感染病医学部,北京 100039解放军总医院感染病医学部,北京 100039解放军总医院肝病医学部,北京 100039北京大学三〇二临床医学院,北京 100039||解放军总医院肝病医学部,北京 100039解放军总医院感染病医学部,北京 100039
医药卫生
慢性乙型肝炎恩替卡韦基因型耐药突变
chronic hepatitis Bentecavirgenotypedrug resistance mutation
《解放军医学杂志》 2026 (2)
171-177,7
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82470632),and the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFC2306800) 国家自然科学基金(82470632)国家重点研发计划(2023YFC2306800)
评论