深埋隧洞TBM施工过程应变型岩爆能量演化规律及影响因素OA
Energy evolution law and influencing factors of strain rockburst during TBM construction in deep tunnels
为揭示深埋隧洞TBM掘进应变型岩爆孕育的能量演化规律及影响因素,以某实际工程花岗岩岩爆洞段为依托,首先,基于内变量蠕变模型开展隧洞TBM开挖支护的三维精细化数值仿真;其次,分析施工过程围岩应变能密度和能量耗散率演化规律,并结合实际岩爆案例验证其合理性;最后,探究岩性、地应力、掘进速率对能量演化的影响.研究结果表明:应变型岩爆孕育过程能量演化呈现"双峰"特征,分别指示掌子面附近的瞬时岩爆和后方一定距离处的滞后岩爆;现场监测到的中等岩爆呈现岩板劈裂、岩片弹射等典型滞后应变型岩爆特征,数值计算所得应变能密度和能量耗散率二次集中区域与实际岩爆区(掌子面后方8~14 m,底板左侧30°~60°)较吻合;应变能密度可评估岩爆危险性(储能规模),而能量耗散率作为稳定性指标可衡量岩爆易发性(潜在失稳部位),二者结合有望综合判定岩爆风险;强度参数a、R增大会提高应变能峰值但降低能量耗散率峰值,黏滞系数κp2(控制稳态蠕变速率)影响与之相反,黏滞系数ηp1(控制过渡蠕变速率)增大则主要增强能量峰值的空间滞后性;当最小水平主应力侧压力系数由0.8增至1.6时,岩爆风险剧增,围岩应变能和能量耗散率峰值分别提升约1倍和2倍;TBM掘进速率增加主要导致能量耗散率峰值增大,且超过一定速率阈值时,岩爆易发性显著升高.
To reveal the energy evolution laws and influencing factors of strain rockbursts induced by TBM excavation in deep tunnels,firstly,a 3-D refined numerical simulation of TBM tunneling and support for a granite rockburst section of an actual engineering project was conducted by using an internal variable creep model.Secondly,the evolution pattern of strain energy density and energy dissipation rate of surrounding rock during TBM construction process were analyzed,with its rationality verified against actual rockburst cases.Finally,the influences of rock properties,in-situ stress,and TBM advance rate on energy evolution were investigated.The results show that the energy evolution during strain rockburst formation process exhibits double-peak characteristics,corresponding to instantaneous rockbursts near the tunnel face and delayed rockbursts occurring at a certain distance behind the face,respectively.The field-observed moderate rockburst manifests typical delayed strainburst features like rock slab buckling and rock fragment ejection.The secondary concentration zones of numerically calculated strain energy density and energy dissipation rate show good agreement with the actual rockburst region(8-14 m behind the face and 30°-60° on the left side of tunnel invert).Strain energy density can indicate the severity of rockburst hazard(energy storage scale),while energy dissipation rate,as a stability indicator,can evaluate rockburst tendency(potential instability locations).Their combination offers a promising approach for comprehensive rockburst risk assessment.Increasing strength parameters a and R raises the strain energy peak but lowers the energy dissipation rate peak,whereas the effect of increasing viscosity coefficient κp2(controlling steady-state creep rate)is opposite.Increasing viscosity coefficient ηp1(controlling transient creep rate)primarily enhances the spatial lag of energy peaks.When the lateral pressure coefficient of minimum horizontal principal stress increases from 0.8 to 1.6,the rockburst risk intensifies markedly,and the strain energy and energy dissipation rate peaks of surrounding rock increase by approximately onefold and twofold,respectively.An increase in the TBM advance rate primarily leads to a rise in the peak energy dissipation rate.When the rate exceeds a certain threshold range,rockburst tendency can increase significantly.
刘耀儒;张如九;吴峥;李祥春;张琪;武超;于明圆
清华大学水圈科学与水利工程全国重点实验室,北京,100084清华大学水圈科学与水利工程全国重点实验室,北京,100084北京大学遥感与地理信息系统研究所,北京,100871中国矿业大学(北京)应急管理与安全工程学院,北京,100083清华大学水圈科学与水利工程全国重点实验室,北京,100084||北京市科学技术研究院城市安全与环境科学研究所,北京,100054清华大学水圈科学与水利工程全国重点实验室,北京,100084清华大学水圈科学与水利工程全国重点实验室,北京,100084
建筑与水利
深埋隧洞TBM岩爆能量演化侧压力系数掘进速率
deep tunneltunnel boring machine(TBM)rockburstenergy evolutionlateral pressure coefficientadvance rate
《中南大学学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (2)
694-707,14
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52179105)犬木塘水库工程科技创新资助项目(20222001412)(Project(52179105)supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaProject(20222001412)supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Quanmutang Engineering)
评论