医疗人工智能算法正义实现的三阶困境及其法治回应OA
The three-stage dilemma and its legal response in realizing algorithm justice for medical artificial intelligence
在医疗服务模式数字化转型时期,维持医疗人工智能算法正义具有多重价值意蕴.然而,实现此价值目标的不同阶段均存在现实困境:在诊疗决策初始阶段,存在患者知情同意权效能弱化、权益保障与技术创新的协同度低等患者权益失衡风险;在诊疗决策过程中,算法模型受制于底层应用的技术瓶颈,偏离技术中立的法治轨道;在诊疗决策生成后,诱发患者权益救济危机,滋生主体资格及归责原则界定模糊现象.为此,应建立以患者权益保护为核心的前置保障制度,同时设置技术公平标准,塑造技术中立程度审查规范,确保患者权益救济渠道均衡,促进多元主体担责比例公平,进而维护智能诊疗领域的公平正义.
In the period of digital transformation of the medical service model,maintaining algorithm justice for medical artificial intelligence possesses multiple value implications.However,practical dilemmas exist at different stages of achieving this value goal.At the initial stage of diagnosis and treatment decision-making,there is a risk of imbalance in patients'rights and interests,such as weakened effectiveness of patients'right to informed consent,as well as low synergy between rights and interests protection and technological innovation.In the process of diagnosis and treatment decision-making,the algorithmic model is constrained by the technological bottleneck in the underlying application,deviating from the legal track of technological neutrality.After the diagnosis and treatment decision-making is generated,it triggers a crisis in the remedy of patients'rights and interests and breeds the phenomenon of an ambiguous definition of subject qualification and attribution principle.In this regard,it is essential to establish a preemptive safeguard system focusing on the protection of patients'rights and interests,set technological fairness standards,and shape review norms of technological neutrality.The aim is to ensure the equalization of remedy channels for patients'rights and interests,promote the fairness in the proportion of responsibilities among multiple subjects,and thereby safeguard the digital justice in the field of intelligent diagnosis and treatments.
陈嘉欣;徐着雨;岳远雷
湖北中医药大学医学人文学院,湖北 武汉 430065湖北中医药大学医学人文学院,湖北 武汉 430065湖北中医药大学医学人文学院,湖北 武汉 430065||湖北大健康产业发展研究中心,湖北 武汉 430065
医药卫生
医疗人工智能算法正义知情同意健康数据公平
medical artificial intelligencealgorithm justiceinformed consentfairness in health data
《中国医学伦理学》 2026 (3)
279-286,8
2022年度教育厅哲学社会科学研究重点项目"家庭医生签约服务中执业行为法治规制及保障研究"(2022059)
评论