首页|期刊导航|健康发展与政策研究|国家药品集中带量采购中选价与协议期满接续价格的衔接研究

国家药品集中带量采购中选价与协议期满接续价格的衔接研究OA

Linkage between winning prices in national volume-based drug procurement and renewal prices upon agreement expiry

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析我国国家药品集中带量采购(以下简称"国采")接续进展,总结国采和协议期满接续政策衔接情况,为完善接续政策提出建议.方法 梳理国采第一至六批次的中选结果和接续采购方案,采用描述性统计分析方法对国采中选价、接续中选价、接续中选企业数等进行分析总结.结果 截至2024年12月,234种药品协议期满,其中232种已完成接续.接续形成了由河南、上海、广东、江苏等牵头的"核心接续联盟".总体上,前6批药品接续价格继续下降,平均降幅约15%,但17.7%的药品在接续阶段的价格出现不同程度回升.不同联盟因采购组织方式不同,持续价格变化幅度存在差异.接续后同品种价格差异在不同批次表现不一:第一批价格差值加剧、第三批价格差值缩小,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).地区层面,国采阶段西部地区价格比全国平均水平高1.0%,接续后西部地区中选价比全国接续均价低0.4%.结论 国采药品接续后价格总体下降但部分品种回升,不同接续方式对价格影响存在差异,同品种及地区间价格差异仍需关注.建议开展不同接续方式效果评估,推动接续工作透明化,加强价格波动监测,完善地区间价格协调并与"四同药品"(即"同通用名同厂牌同剂型同规格"药品)价格治理政策协同.

Objective This study aims to analyze the progress of China's national volume-based drug procurement(NVBP),renewal,summarize the policy linkage between NVBP and renewal upon agreement expiry,and to provide suggestions for improving renewal policies.Methods Selection results and renewal procurement plans from NVBP Rounds 1-6 were compiled.Descriptive statistics were employed to examine NVBP winning prices,renewal winning prices,and the number of successful bidders.Results As of December 2024,agreements for 234 medicines had expired,of which 232 had completed the renewal process.Core renewal procurement consortia,led by Henan,Shanghai,Guangdong,and Jiangsu,emerged.Overall,renewal prices for the first 6 rounds of medicines continued to decline,with an average reduction of approximately 15%.However,17.7%of medicines saw price rebounds during the renewal.The magnitude of price changes varied across consortia due to different methodologies.Price dispersion for the same product after renewal fluctuated:differentials widened in Round 1 but narrowed in Round 3(P<0.05).Regionally,during the NVBP phase,winning prices in western China shifted from 1.0%higher than the national average initially to 0.4%below post-renewal.Conclusions Renewal procurement generally led to further price reductions following NVBP,although prices for some products rebounded.Different renewal mechanisms influenced price outcomes,and price disparities across products and regions remain notable.Future efforts should focus on evaluating the effects of different renewal methods,promoting transparency in renewal work,strengthening price fluctuation monitoring,improving inter-regional price coordination,and aligning renewal policies with the governance of medicines with the same generic name,dosage form,strength,and made by the same manufacturer.

许倩;苏月雯;刘宝

复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海 200032||国家卫生健康委员会卫生技术评估重点实验室(复旦大学),上海 200032复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海 200032||国家卫生健康委员会卫生技术评估重点实验室(复旦大学),上海 200032复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海 200032||国家卫生健康委员会卫生技术评估重点实验室(复旦大学),上海 200032

医药卫生

国家药品集中带量采购接续中选价格政策衔接

national volume-based drug procurementrenewal procurementwinning pricepolicy linkage

《健康发展与政策研究》 2026 (1)

44-51,8

10.12458/HDPR.202504002

评论