首页|期刊导航|临床研究|奥沙利铂与紫杉醇分别联合卡培他滨在局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗中的疗效与安全性对比研究

奥沙利铂与紫杉醇分别联合卡培他滨在局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗中的疗效与安全性对比研究OA

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oxaliplatin Plus Capecitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Capecitabine as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 对比奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨(XELOX)方案与紫杉醇联合卡培他滨(TX)方案作为新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗局部进展期胃癌(LAGC)的近期疗效与安全性.方法 将2022年2月至2024年2月河南理工大学第一附属医院(焦作市第二人民医院)就诊的 68 例LAGC患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,各 34 例.两组均行NAC,对照组采用TX方案,研究组采用XELOX方案.比较两组肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)、肿瘤标志物水平、无进展生存期(PFS)及不良反应发生率.结果 研究组肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)1a~1b级率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).化疗 3 个疗程后,研究组血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原(CA)19-9、CA72-4 水平均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组无进展生存期(PFS)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).研究组恶心/呕吐、周围神经毒性发生率均高于对照组,脱发、骨髓抑制发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 XELOX方案在NAC中能获得更低的TRG分级,且骨髓抑制更轻,但胃肠道反应和周围神经毒性更常见.两种方案在PFS上无显著差异.临床选择需权衡疗效与毒性谱.

Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine(XELOX)versus paclitaxel plus capecitabine(TX)as neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)for locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC).Methods A total of 68 patients with LAGC who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Polytechnic University(Jiaozuo Second People's Hospital)between February 2022 and February 2024 were enrolled and randomized by a random number table into a control group and a study group(n=34 each).Both groups received NAC.The control group received the TX regimen,whereas the study group received the XELOX regimen.Tumor regression grade(TRG),tumor marker levels,progression-free survival(PFS),and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results The proportion of patients achieving TRG 1a~1b was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group(P<0.05).After three chemotherapy cycles,serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9),and carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA72-4)levels were lower in the study group than in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the two groups(P>0.05).The study group had higher incidences of nausea/vomiting and peripheral neurotoxicity,but lower incidences of alopecia and myelosuppression,than the control group;all differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In NAC for LAGC,the XELOX regimen yields a higher rate of favorable TRG(lower TRG grade)and is associated with less myelosuppression,but gastrointestinal reactions and peripheral neurotoxicity are more common.The two regimens show no significant difference in PFS.Clinical selection should balance efficacy against the toxicity profile.

侯晶晶;王珍珍;付培彪

河南理工大学第一附属医院(焦作市第二人民医院) 肿瘤内科一区,河南 焦作 454000河南理工大学第一附属医院(焦作市第二人民医院) 肿瘤内科一区,河南 焦作 454000河南理工大学第一附属医院(焦作市第二人民医院) 肿瘤内科一区,河南 焦作 454000

局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗奥沙利铂卡培他滨肿瘤标志物无进展生存期

locally advanced gastric cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyoxaliplatincapecitabinetumor markersprogression-free survival

《临床研究》 2026 (3)

77-80,4

10.12385/j.issn.2096-1278(2026)03-0077-04

评论