认知控制与显著性加工在类别注意选择中的分工与协同机制OACHSSCD
Functional division and synergy of cognitive control and salience processing in category-based attentional selection:Evidence from fMRI
类别注意选择(CAS)是大脑通过抽象类别表征优化信息筛选的核心过程,但其受认知控制和显著性加工的协同机制尚不明确.本研究结合多数函数任务(MFT,通过符号类别比例操纵认知负载:低负载3:0,高负载2:1)与Oddball范式(通过刺激概率操纵显著水平:标准刺激80%,新异刺激20%),并区分目标相关性(任务相关改变类别概率;任务无关改变颜色概率),系统地考察了认知控制与显著性加工对CAS的行为与神经调控机制.行为结果显示:高认知负载显著降低CAS效率,新异刺激的干扰效应仅在任务相关时显著.三者的交互作用表明,仅任务相关时,高负载下新异刺激的干扰效应显著大于低负载;fMRI结果显示,高认知负载激活背侧注意网络(DLPFC、SPL),新异刺激则激活了腹侧注意网络(rTPJ、AIC);联合激活分析显示,两者在认知控制网络(SPL、ACC、AIC)存在共同激活;多体素模式分析(MVPA)发现,右侧顶枕结合区(rPOJ)和额眼区(FEF)对认知负载与显著性加工的解码精度达 86.83%,表明其可以协同双通路信息以动态分配资源.总的来说,认知控制与显著性加工分别通过背侧与腹侧网络消耗资源;当两者并存时,认知控制网络通过冲突解析与资源再分配决定CAS效率.本研究在类别层面揭示了认知控制与显著性加工的分工与协同机制,提出动态路径模型,为完善注意双通路模型提供了新的神经实证支撑.
Category-based attentional selection(CAS)enables the visual system to prioritize objects that share an abstract,semantic label.For example,"tools,""letters,"or"animals."Yet how cognitive load and salience processing jointly sculpt this high-level form of attention remains unclear.Here we combined a Majority Function Task(MFT)with a visual Oddball manipulation in a fully crossed 2(load:low 3:0 vs.high 2:1 ratio)×2(salience level:standard 80%vs.Oddball 20%)×2(salience relevance:task-relevant vs.task-irrelevant)design.Twenty-nine right-handed adults(24 women;18−27 yrs)performed 768 trials while BOLD signals were recorded in a 3 T scanner;eye position was concurrently monitored to rule out overt shifts. Inverse-efficiency scores(IES=RT/accuracy)confirmed the expected main effect of load,but also revealed a three-way interaction:under high load,task-relevant Oddballs produced the largest cost(Cohen’s d=0.81),whereas task-irrelevant Oddballs caused a moderate,load-dependent slowdown.This pattern supports a resource-competition account in which maintaining a category template and suppressing conspicuous distractors draw on a common,finite pool. Whole-brain GLM revealed a functional division of effects.Cognitive load(high>low)boosted activity throughout the dorsal control network,including bilateral superior parietal lobule(SPL),dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex(DLPFC)and insula,whereas salience level(Oddball>standard)preferentially recruited ventral salience nodes,including right angular gyrus,bilateral anterior insula and caudate nucleus.By contrast,salience relevance(task-relevant vs.task-irrelevant)produced no reliable univariate clusters,mirroring the absence of a pure relevance main effect in local BOLD amplitude.To test whether relevance information was nonetheless encoded in spatial patterns,we performed multivariate pattern analysis(MVPA).A linear support-vector machine trained on voxels that were jointly responsive to load and salience distinguished the eight experimental conditions with 86.83%accuracy(t=73.57,p<.001).Weight-map inspection showed that the right superior occipital/parieto-occipital junction and right pre-central gyrus contributed most strongly but not exclusively,suggesting rPOJ and FEF serve as a convergence hub together with premotor nodes.Thus,although relevance does not manifest as a simple amplitude shift,it is robustly represented in distributed activation patterns and in the connectivity of a posterior occipito-parietal hub,highlighting a pattern-based,network-level code that reconciles the dorsal−ventral division of labor with successful category-based attentional selection. These converging results indicate that CAS operates through a layered priority architecture:dorsal control regions inject goal-related gain,ventral salience regions register statistical deviance,and rPOJ/FEF synergistically re-weights both streams to rebalance priority values when resources are scarce.Taken together,our findings extend priority-map theory into the semantic domain and demonstrate that cognitive load is a key moderator of how salience relevance shapes the competition between dorsal and ventral attention systems. By isolating where(dorsal vs.ventral)and how(pattern vs.amplitude)cognitive load and salience relevance interact,the study refines dual-route models of attention and identifies rPOJ and FEF as pivotal hubs for balancing task demands against environmental conspicuity,that is,a mechanism likely critical for real-world scenarios that call for rapid category-based decisions under pressure.
吴瑕;李依薇;孙晓雅;陈瀛;姜云鹏;陈岩
天津师范大学心理学部||教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院||学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津 300387天津师范大学心理学部天津师范大学心理学部天津职业技术师范大学职业教育学院,天津 300222天津师范大学心理学部||教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院||学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津 300387贵州师范大学心理学院,贵阳 550000||天津师范大学心理学部
社会科学
认知控制显著性加工类别注意认知控制网络右侧顶枕结合区
cognitive controlsalience processingcategory-based attentioncognitive control networkright parieto-occipital junction
《心理学报》 2026 (4)
603-617,15
全国教育科学规划项目(资助编号:DBA230368).
评论