家庭结构与消费风险分散:独生和非独生夫妻家庭比较OACHSSCD
Family Structure and Consumption Risk Diversification:A Comparison Between Households with and without Siblings
在少子化的人口结构转型背景下,家庭抵御收入风险、平滑消费的能力和渠道可能发生系统性变化.利用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)2010-2018年期间的五轮住户调查数据构造非平衡面板,基于Blundell-Pistaferri-Preston(BPP)模型使用拟最大似然估计(QMLE)方法估计独生夫妻和非独生夫妻家庭消费保险的差异.结果表明,独生夫妻家庭的消费保险程度更高,持久收入每波动10%,则独生夫妻家庭的消费变化2.86%,而非独生夫妻家庭消费变化4.03%;暂时性收入冲击对家庭消费影响较弱.农村独生夫妻家庭消费保险能力较弱;在西部地区,家庭消费保险程度总体较低.探讨了社会资本和家庭财产在消费平滑中的作用,尽管非独生夫妻家庭有更高的社会资本水平,但并没有发现社会资本增强了家庭消费保险能力;独生夫妻家庭具有更多的家庭财产,且家庭财产对消费保险具有明显的积极作用,因而,独生夫妻家庭相对于非独生夫妻家庭具有更强的消费保险效应.基于研究发现,提出完善保险体系和社会保障体系等正式制度安排,提高其运行效率、保障家庭抵抗收入风险能力;通过不断提高低收入地区和低收入家庭的收入水平、缓解信贷约束等措施,增强家庭财富积累能力和应对冲击的韧性等政策建议.
Against the backdrop of declining fertility and demographic transition,the ability and channels for families to mitigate income risk and smooth consumption may undergo systematic changes.Using the data of the China Family Panel Studies(CFPS)from 2010 to 2018,this paper constructs an unbalanced panel and applies the quasi-maximum likelihood estimation(QMLE)approach based on the BPP model to estimate differences in consumption insurance between one-child couples and non-one-child couples.The results show that households without siblings are more consumption secured.A 10%of permanent income shock changes consumption by 2.86%for households without siblings,compared to a 4.03%change for households with siblings.Temporary income shocks have a smaller impact on household consumption.In rural area,households without siblings are least consumption insured.In western region,households are less consumption insured than eastern and middle region.This paper examines the role of social capital and household assets in consumption smoothing and finds that households with siblings have more social capital,while social capital has no effect on consumption insurance according to our results.Households without siblings have more assets and assets have a significantly positive effect on consumption insurance.So,households without siblings have a stronger consumption insurance effect compared to households with siblings.Thus,it is particularly important to improve formal institutional arrangement such as the insurance system and social security system and enhance their operational efficiency to ensure families'ability to resist income risks.At the same time,measures such as continuously increasing the income levels and alleviating credit constraints in low-income regions and families should be implemented to enhance the ability to accumulate wealth and resilience in the face of shocks.
罗楚亮;邓金锋
首都经济贸易大学 劳动经济学院,北京 100070中国人民大学 劳动人事学院,北京 100872
社会科学
独生夫妻家庭非独生夫妻家庭消费保险家庭结构社会资本家庭财产
households without siblingshouseholds with siblingsconsumption insurancefamily structuresocial capitalhouseholds'assets
《人口与经济》 2026 (2)
75-90,16
国家自然科学基金面上项目"少子化倾向对家庭消费风险分散与内部资源配置的影响研究"(72573110).
评论