中国环境司法专门化:动因、风险及其治理OACHSSCD
The Specialization of Environmental Adjudication in China:Drivers,Risks,and Goverance
司法专门化的必要性及其合理边界,是我国司法改革向纵深推进的前置性课题.环境司法专门化的驱动力包括以中性优势为核心的司法驱动力、以效仿机制为核心的政治驱动力和以政策落实为核心的社会驱动力,其中社会驱动力是根本驱动力.环境司法专门化向纵深推进的风险包括法律制度掣肘风险、司法角色偏移风险及司法成本制约风险.在法律供给方面,应当在《中华人民共和国生态环境法典(草案)》"总则编"设立司法专门化的概括性条款,并明确受案范围与管辖规则;在角色纠偏方面,应当防止"法律审判"异化为"科技审判",并通过扁平化设计避免规制俘获;在成本控制方面,应当审慎设立跨行政区划专门环境法院,并提升既有司法专门化组织的效率.
The necessity of judicial specialization and its reasonable boundaries constitute a prerequisite issue for the in-depth deepening of China's judicial reform.The driving forces to environmental justice specialization include the judicial driving force with neutral advantages at the core,the political one centering on the follow-suit mechanism,and the social one focusing on policy implementation.Among them,the social driving force is fundamental.Deepening environmental adjudication specialization carries inherent risks,including constraints imposed by legal institutions,potential deviations from the proper judicial role,and limitations arising from judicial costs.In terms of legal supply,general provisions on judicial specialization should be incorporated into the"General Provisions"of the draft of The Ecological Environment Code of PRC,explicitly defining the scope of cases and jurisdictional rules.Regarding role correction,it is essential to prevent the distortion of"legal adjudication"into"technocratic adjudication"and to avert regulatory capture through flattened organizational designs.As for cost control,cross-administrative specialized environmental courts should be established prudently,while the efficiency of existing specialized judicial organs should be enhanced.
何江
西南政法大学 经济法学院,重庆 401120
社会科学
环境司法专门化环境审判环境法院三审合一跨区划管辖
《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (1)
57-68,12
重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目"《环境法典》法律责任编立法研究"(22SKGH037)西南政法大学(西部生态法研究中心)校级科研资助项目"《环境法典》与党政联合规范性文件衔接机制研究"(2021XZNDJDQN-07)
评论