生态环境修复责任追究机制的体系性整合OACHSSCD

The functionalist approach demonstrates significant alignment with the selection of eco-environmental remediation liability accountability mechanisms.A cost-benefit comparative analysis of institutional frameworks must be prioritized in evaluating mechanisms for holding entities accountable for ecological remediation.Both administrative and judicial mechanisms exhibit relative and uncertain cost-efficiency characteristics,each endowed with distinct functional advantages.The choice between accountability mechanisms ultimately reflects a selection"among imperfect alternatives",as evidenced by legislative diversity across jurisdictions.To optimize institutional design,the integration of multi-dimensional remediation accountability mechanisms must adhere to the"principle of minimum institutional cost-effectiveness"and the"principle of rational division of state powers",while establishing a"administrative-dominant,judicial-supplementary"liability enforcement framework.Ensuring the sustainability of eco-environmental damage remedies necessitates transforming this integration into stable,reliable statutory provisions.Although the recently promulgated The Ecological Environment Code of PRC contains several provisions addressing liability mechanisms for ecological restoration,further optimization is still necessary.