低浓度瓦斯利用途径与自愿减排效益研究OA
Research on utilization pathways for low-concentration methane and voluntary emission reduction benefits
煤矿瓦斯是我国重要的甲烷排放源,其中低浓度瓦斯占比极高,但因利用难度大而大量直接排放.为应对气候变化,我国发布首个煤炭行业CCER方法学,并下调煤矿瓦斯排放限制,鼓励低浓度瓦斯利用.笔者深入探讨我国低浓度煤矿瓦斯的利用途径,并对其自愿减排效益进行量化分析.研究表明,来自能源供应的甲烷排放是我国甲烷排放的重要组成部分,其中煤矿开采产生的低浓度瓦斯占比极高,其直接排放构成显著的温室气体排放源.尽管近年来我国瓦斯回收利用技术取得长足发展,形成梯级利用体系,并得益于政策驱动,瓦斯抽采利用量显著增长,但低浓度瓦斯,尤其是乏风瓦斯,因其极低的浓度,利用技术经济性不足,企业投资积极性不高,成为瓦斯减排的难点.系统梳理低浓度瓦斯减排的政策驱动,分析瓦斯发电、瓦斯浓缩提纯、掺混燃烧以及瓦斯氧化制热利用等主要利用途径,并从瓦斯浓度、排放量、地理位置及项目收益等维度进行比较.结果显示,我国在低浓度瓦斯提纯浓缩、直接燃烧及发电技术方面已达到国际领先水平.在此基础上,以某煤矿采用蓄热氧化技术处理 2%瓦斯浓度为例,依据方法学对其基准线排放量、项目排放量进行详细计算,并得出项目减排量为 83 525 tCO2e/a.基于当前碳交易市场价格,该项目每年的碳减排收益可达646.81 万元,投资回收期约3a以上,显示出良好的经济效益.然而,低浓度瓦斯利用项目仍面临获取稳定气源、稳定燃烧与安全输送、以及主体投资方与煤矿企业之间合作模式等方面的挑战.为进一步推动低浓度瓦斯的高效利用与减排,建议加强项目的统一规划与政策支持,将排放标准从浓度控制扩展至总量控制,并健全煤矿甲烷监测、报告和核证(MRV)制度和排放数据体系,从源头、过程和监管等多个维度促进煤矿瓦斯资源的有效利用,助力国家"双碳"目标的实现.
Coal mine methane constitutes a significant source of methane emissions in China,with low⁃concentration methane accounting for a substantial proportion.However,due to challenges in utilization,large volumes are directly vented.To address climate change,China has released its first Coal⁃to⁃Energy Conversion(CCER)methodology for the coal industry and lowered methane emission limits for coal mines,encouraging the utilization of low⁃concentration methane.This paper delves into utilization pathways for low⁃concentration coal mine gas in China and quantitatively analyzes its voluntary emission reduction benefits.Research indicates that methane emissions from energy supply con⁃stitute a significant portion of China's total methane emissions,with low⁃concentration gas from coal mining ac⁃counting for a substantial share.Its direct venting represents a significant greenhouse gas emission source.Despite substantial advancements in China's gas recovery and utilization technologies in recent years—including the estab⁃lishment of a tiered utilization system and policy⁃driven growth in gas extraction volumes—low⁃concentration gas,par⁃ticularly de⁃gassed coal mine gas,remains a challenge for emissions reduction.Its extremely low concentration ren⁃ders utilization economically unviable,dampening corporate investment enthusiasm.This article reviews policy driv⁃ers for low⁃concentration gas reduction,analyzes primary utilization pathways including gas⁃fired power generation,gas concentration and purification,blending combustion,and gas oxidation for heat production,and compares these approaches based on gas concentration,emission volume,geographical location,and project profitability.Results indicate that China has achieved internationally leading levels in low⁃concentration gas purification,direct combus⁃tion,and power generation technologies.Using a coal mine employing regenerative thermal oxidation to treat 2%methane concentration as a case study,this paper calculates baseline emissions and project emissions in detail based on methodologies,concluding that the project achieves annual emissions reductions of 83525 tons of CO2e.Based on current carbon market prices,this project could generate annual carbon reduction revenues of 6.468 1 million CNY,with an investment payback period of approximately three years,demonstrating strong economic viability.However,low⁃concentration methane utilization projects still face challenges in securing stable gas sources,ensuring stable com⁃bustion and safe transportation,and establishing cooperative models between primary investors and coal mining enter⁃prises.To further advance the efficient utilization and emission reduction of low⁃concentration methane,it is recom⁃mended to strengthen unified project planning and policy support.Emission standards should be expanded from con⁃centration control to total volume control,while improving the methane Monitoring,Reporting,and Verification(MRV)system and emission data framework for coal mines.This multi⁃dimensional approach—addressing sources,processes,and oversight—will promote effective utilization of coal mine methane resources and contribute to achieving the nation's dual carbon goals.
付楚芮
煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司,北京 100013||国家能源煤炭高效利用与节能减排技术装备重点实验室,北京 100013||煤基节能环保炭材料北京市重点实验室,北京 100013||中国煤科低碳技术研究院,北京 100013
资源环境
甲烷瓦斯温室气体自愿减排效益研究定量分析
methanegasvoluntary greenhouse gas emissions reductionbenefit studyquantitative analysis
《煤质技术》 2026 (2)
47-53,7
天地科技股份科技创新创业资金资助项目(2023-2-TD-R003)
评论