首页|期刊导航|绿洲农业科学与工程|滴头流量对不同质地棉田土壤湿润区的影响研究

滴头流量对不同质地棉田土壤湿润区的影响研究OA

Effect of Different Drip Head Flow Rates on Soil Wetted Zones in Cotton Fields

中文摘要英文摘要

为明确不同流量滴灌带下的棉田土壤湿润锋及土壤水、盐和温度的变化,通过选择1.1 L·h-1(小流量)、2.6 L·h-1(中流量)和3.2 L·h-1(大流量)的滴灌带在砂性和黏性土壤上进行滴水模拟研究.结果表明:在相同的滴水时间内,砂性土和黏性土在1.1 L·h-1、2.6 L·h-1和3.2L·h-1流量下的土壤电导率和体积含水率呈相同趋势,水平方向电导率呈现为从周围向滴头方向下降,砂土在1.1 L·h-1流量下降幅最大为91.03%,黏土也在1.1 L·h-1流量下降幅最大为87.38%;垂直方向从深层向表层下降,砂土在1.1 L·h-1流量下降幅最大为93.91%,黏土在2.6 L·h-1流量下降幅最大为83.93%;而土壤体积含水率在水平和垂直方向上的趋势同电导率相反,呈负相关性;砂土在2.6 L·h-1流量下水平方向湿润锋运移距离最大为35.0 cm,在3.2 L·h-1流量下垂直方向湿润锋运移距离最大为20.0 cm,黏土在1.1 L·h-1流量下水平方向湿润锋运移距离最小为27.0 cm,在1.1 L·h-1流量下垂直方向湿润锋运移距离最大为15.0 cm;砂性土的湿润区形状近似半圆(窄而深),黏性土则近似椭圆(宽而浅);黏性土壤在1.1 L·h-1流量下水平湿润锋与垂直湿润锋连线同水平湿润锋的角度最大为47.98°,砂性土壤在3.2 L·h-1流量下角度最大为51.34°,结合湿润锋运移距离,综合分析,砂土在3.2 L·h-1流量下垂直入渗深,水平方向扩散较小,黏土则在1.1 L·h-1流量下入渗深度大,表层扩散小,有利于减少地表径流,因此建议砂土地选大流量滴灌带,黏土地选用小流量滴灌带,以期为师市棉田的精准灌溉提供参考.

In order to clarify the soil wetting front and changes in soil water,salt and temperature in cotton fields under drip irrigation tapes with different flow rates,drip simulation studies were carried out on sandy and clayey soils by selecting drip irrigation tapes with 1.1 L·h-1(small flow rate),2.6 L·h-1(medium flow rate)and 3.2 L·h-1(large flow rate).The results showed that soil conductivity and volumetric water content at 1.1 L·h-1,2.6 L·h-1 and 3.2 L·h-1 flow rates followed the same trend for the same drip time on sandy and clayey soils.In the horizontal direction,the conductivity showed a decrease from the periphery towards the drip head,with the sandy soil showing the largest decrease of 91.03%at 1.1 L·h-1 flow rate,and the clay soil also showing the largest decrease of 87.38%at 1.1 L·h-1 flow rate.Vertical direction decreases from deep to surface with maximum 93.91%decrease in sandy soil at 1.1 L·h-1 flow rate and 83.93%decrease in clay at 2.6 L·h-1 flow rate.In contrast,the trend of soil volumetric water content in the horizontal and vertical directions is opposite to that of electrical conductivity,with negative correlation.The sandy soil has a maximum wetting front transport distance of 35.0 cm horizontally at 2.6 L·h-1 flow rate and 20.0 cm vertically at 3.2 L·h-1 flow rate,while the clay soil has a minimum wetting front transport distance of 27.0 cm horizontally at 1.1 L·h-1 flow rate and a maximum wetting front transport distance of 15.0 cm vertically at 1.1 L·h-1 flow rate.The shape of the wetted zone is nearly semicircular(narrow and deep)in sandy soils and nearly elliptical(wide and shallow)in clayey soils.The angle between the horizontal and vertical wetting fronts at 1.1 L·h-1 flow rate and the horizontal wetting front is 47.98° for clayey soils and 51.34° for sandy soils at 3.2 L·h-1 flow rate.Combined with the wetting fraction transport distance,a comprehensive analysis shows that sandy soils have deep vertical infiltration and small horizontal diffusion at a flow rate of 3.2 L·h-1,while clay soils have a large infiltration depth and small surface diffusion at a flow rate of 1.1 L·h-1,which is conducive to the reduction of surface runoff.Therefore,it is recommended to select high flow drip irrigation tapes for sandy soils and low flow drip irrigation tapes for clayey soils in order to provide reference for precision irrigation of cotton fields in the division.

张冬冬;邵延慧;焦润兴;陈玲;张涛;卜东升;蒲艳梅

新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300

农业科技

不同流量滴灌带棉田土壤湿润区电导率角度

drip irrigation strips with different flow ratescotton field soilwet zoneconductivityangle

《绿洲农业科学与工程》 2026 (1)

50-59,10

新疆"天山英才"培养计划青年拔尖人才项目(2024TSYCJC0087)师市科技计划项目—阿拉尔垦区不同干播湿出年限棉田土壤盐分变化规律研究(2024NY10)国家现代农业产业技术体系棉花产业技术体系(CARS-15-43)南疆"干播湿出"棉花节水控盐与高产高效栽培技术集成与示范(NYHXGG,2023AA303),第一师"干播湿出"棉花节水控盐与高产高效栽培技术示范应用 Xinjiang"Tianshan Talents"Cultivation Programme for Outstanding Young Talents(2024TSYCJC0087)Division City Science and Technology Programme Project-Alar Reclamation Area Different Dry Sowing Wet Out Years Cotton Field Soil Salinity Change Law Research(2024NY10)Supported by the earmarked fund for(CARS-15-43)Integration and Demonstration of Water-Saving,Salt-Control and High-Yield Efficient Cultivation Techniques for'Dry-So wing,Wet-Emergence'Cotton in Southern Xinjiang(NYHXGG,2023AA303),Demonstration Application of'Dry-Sowing,Wet-Emergence'Cotton Water-Saving,Salt-Control and High-Yield Efficient Cultivation Techniques in the First Division

10.26941/j.cnki.2096-2177.2026.01.009

评论