首页|期刊导航|临床误诊误治|十二指肠溃疡穿孔误诊原因分析及防范措施

十二指肠溃疡穿孔误诊原因分析及防范措施OA

Analysis of causes of misdiagnosis and preventive measures for duodenal ulcer perforation

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析十二指肠溃疡穿孔临床误诊原因及防范误诊措施.方法 回顾性分析2022年6月—2024年6月收治的曾误诊的3例十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者的临床资料.结果 1例突发右侧腹痛3.5 h就诊,初诊为急性腹膜炎,术中确诊十二指肠溃疡穿孔,误诊时间1 d;确诊后行十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补+阑尾切除术,术后恢复良好,随访无复发.1例因转移性右下腹痛3 d,伴发热,麦氏点压痛阳性,白细胞计数升高,初诊为急性阑尾炎,术中确诊为十二指肠溃疡穿孔,误诊时间1 d;确诊后术中引流渗液并置管,术后予胃肠减压、抗炎治疗,12 d痊愈出院;术后复查胃镜证实溃疡愈合.1例因持续右下腹痛3 d伴腹泻入院,初步诊断为急性阑尾炎,术中见阑尾轻度充血但无典型炎症,进一步探查发现十二指肠溃疡穿孔,伴少量腹腔渗出液,误诊时间1 d;确诊后行十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补+引流术,术后胃肠减压引流出咖啡样胃液,经抗炎、抑酸治疗后康复,随访6个月无复发.结论 十二指肠溃疡穿孔易误诊为急性阑尾炎或腹膜炎,临床医师应详细询问溃疡病史及诱因,警惕非典型体征,必要时扩大探查范围,以减少误诊.

Objective To analyze the causes of clinical misdiagnosis of duodenal ulcer(DU)perforation and the preventive measures against such misdiagnosis.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 3 patients with DU perforation that were initially misdiagnosed and admitted during the period from June 2022 to June 2024.Results One patient presented with sudden right abdominal pain for 3.5 h and was initially diagnosed as acute peritonitis.During the operation,it was confirmed as DU perforation.The misdiagnosis period was 1 d.After the diagnosis,repair of perforated DU and appendectomy were performed.The patient recovered well and there was no recurrence during follow-up.One patient had migratory right lower quadrant pain for 3 d,accompanied by fever,tenderness at McBurney's point,and elevated white blood cell count.The initial diagnosis was acute appendicitis.During the operation,it was confirmed as DU perforation.The misdiagnosis period was 1 d.After the diagnosis,drainage of fluid and catheter placement were performed during the operation,and postoperative gastrointestinal decompression and anti-inflammatory treatment were given.The patient recovered and was discharged 12 d afterwards.Postoperative gastroscopy confirmed ulcer healing.Another patient had persistent right lower quadrant pain for 3 d accompanied by diarrhea.The initial diagnosis was acute appendicitis.During the operation,mild congestion of the appendix was observed but no typical inflammation was present.Further exploration revealed DU perforation,accompanied by a small amount of abdominal cavity exudate.The misdiagnosis period was 1 d.After the diagnosis,repair of perforated DU and drainage were performed.Postoperatively,coffee-ground like gastric fluid was drained via nasogastric tube.After anti-inflammatory and acid-suppressing treatment,the patient recovered and was discharged.No recurrence was observed at 6-month follow-up.Conclusion DU perforation is prone to misdiagnosis as acute appendicitis or peritonitis.Clinicians should inquire in detail about the history and triggers,be vigilant for atypical signs,and,if necessary,expand the exploration scope to reduce misdiagnosis.

高香翠;张舒;曹伟

石家庄市第三医院消化内科,石家庄 050000石家庄市第三医院消化内科,石家庄 050000石家庄市第三医院消化内科,石家庄 050000

十二指肠溃疡穿孔误诊急性腹膜炎急性阑尾炎鉴别诊断胃镜

duodenal ulcer perforationmisdiagnosisacute peritonitisacute appendicitisdifferential diagnosisgastroscopy

《临床误诊误治》 2026 (6)

15-20,6

10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2026.06.003

评论