两种叶型桢楠对干旱胁迫的生理响应OA
Physiological responses of 2 leaf types of Phoebe zhennan to drought stress
[目的]阐明大叶桢楠(Phoebe zhennan f.elliptical)和小叶桢楠(P.zhennan f.oblong)对干旱胁迫的适应性和生理响应机制,为后续育苗和栽培提供理论依据.[方法]以2年生大叶桢楠和小叶桢楠植株为材料,测定不同层次叶片的形态指标和解剖结构,持续干旱处理分析土壤和叶片相对含水量、地上干质量、根系干质量和根冠比等生长指标,以及光合参数(净光合速率Pn、气孔限制值Ls、气孔导度Gs、蒸腾速率Tr、水分利用率WUE)、叶绿素荧光参数(最大光化学量子效率Fv/Fm、实际光化学量子效率ФPSⅡ、电子传递速率ETR、光化学淬灭系数qP、非光化学淬灭系数NPQ)和氧化系统指标(过氧化氢酶CAT、丙二醛MDA、超氧化物歧化酶SOD)的变化.[结果]大叶桢楠叶片较小叶桢楠更厚且细胞结构更紧密.随着干旱胁迫时间的延长,两种叶型桢楠的土壤和叶片相对含水量以及地上干质量均呈下降趋势,而根系干质量和根冠比显著上升.光合指标中,Pn呈下降趋势,Ls、Gs、Tr和WUE先升后降;叶绿素荧光指标Fv/Fm、ФPSⅡ、ETR和qP先平缓后下降,NPQ则先升后降;氧化应激指标CAT活性和MDA含量上升,SOD活性先升后降.当土壤相对含水量为8.79%~11.57%时,大叶桢楠的Pn和CAT等指标均显著高于小叶桢楠.[结论]大叶桢楠相较于小叶桢楠表现出更强抗旱能力.
[Objective]Mechanisms underlying the adaptability and physiological response of Phoebe zhennan f.elliptical(large-leaf type)and P.zhennan f.oblong(small-leaf type)to drought stress were investigated,providing a theoretical basis for subsequent seedling cultivation and cultivation.[Method]Using 2-year-old seedlings of large-and small-leaf P.zhennan as materials,morpholog-ical indices and anatomical structures of leaves at different layers were measured.Then continuous drought treatment was applied to analyze growth indicators such as soil and leaf relative water content,aboveground dry mass,root dry mass,and root-to-shoot ratio,as well as photosynthetic parameters[net photosynthetic rate(Pn),stomatal limitation value(Ls),stomatal conductance(Gs),transpiration rate(Tr)and water use efficiency(WUE)],chlorophyll fluorescence parameters[maximum photochemical quantum efficiency(Fv/Fm),actual photochemical quantum efficiency(ΦPsⅡ),electron transport rate(ETR),photochemical quenching coefficient(qP)and non-photochemical quenching coefficient(NPQ)],and oxidative system indicators[catalase(CAT),malond-ialdehyde(MDA)and superoxide dismutase(SOD)].[Result]The leaves of large-leaf type were thicker and had more compact cellular structure compared to those of the small-leaf type.With prolonged drought stress,the relative water contents of soil and leav-es,as well as the aboveground dry mass of both types showed declining trends,while the root dry mass and root-to-shoot ratio in-creased significantly.Among the photosynthetic parameters,Pn decreased while Ls,Gs,Tr and WUE initially increased and then de-creased.For chlorophyll fluorescence parameters,Fv/Fm,ФPSⅡ,ETR,and qP initially remained stable and then declined,while NPQ firstly increased and then decreased.In the oxidative system,CAT activity and MDA content exhibited uprising trends,while SOD activity initially rose and then declined.When the soil relative water content was between 8.79%and 11.57%,the Pn and CAT level of large-leaf type were significantly higher than those of the small-leaf type.[Conclusion]Large-leaf type of P.zhennan exhibited higher drought resistance compared to the small-leaf type.
王立;付宁宁;苏光浪;方霞;童再康;张俊红
浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院全省林木育种重点实验室,浙江 杭州 311300浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院全省林木育种重点实验室,浙江 杭州 311300庆元县实验林场,浙江丽水 323000浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院全省林木育种重点实验室,浙江 杭州 311300浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院全省林木育种重点实验室,浙江 杭州 311300浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院全省林木育种重点实验室,浙江 杭州 311300
农业科技
桢楠形态特征干旱胁迫光合参数氧化系统
Phoebe zhennanmorphological featuredrought stressphotosynthetic parameteroxidative system
《福建农林大学学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (2)
246-256,11
浙江省农业新品种选育重大专项(2021C2070-10).
评论