陕北毛乌素沙地不同植被类型长期恢复对土壤水力特性的影响OA
Effects of Long-Term Restoration of Different Vegetation Types on Soil Hydraulic Properties in the Mu Us Sandy Land of Northern Shaanxi
为了研究陕北毛乌素沙地不同植被类型长期恢复下(40a左右)土壤水力特性的变化特征及影响因素,选取典型乔木人工林(樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica)、油松(Pinus tabuliformis Carrière)、侧柏(Platycladuis orientalis(L.)Franco)和杨树(Populus)人工林)、灌木人工林(柠条(Caragana korshinskii Kom.)人工林)作为研究对象,同时将荒地设为对照(CK).通过对不同植被类型下林地不同土层深度(h,0<h≤10 cm、10 cm<h≤20 cm、20 cm<h ≤30 cm)的土壤水力特性(饱和导水率、田间持水量、饱和含水量)进行测定,结合土壤基本理化性质,揭示该地区不同植被类型长期恢复对土壤水力特性的影响.结果表明:不同植被类型饱和导水率平均值由大到小依次为杨树(5.03 cm·h-1)、侧柏(2.50 cm·h-1)、油松(1.84 cm·h-1)、樟子松(1.79 cm·h-1)、柠条(1.09 cm·h-1)、荒地(0.64 cm·h-1);田间持水量平均值由大到小依次为杨树(23.98%)、油松(21.00%)、侧柏(20.66%)、樟子松(19.46%)、柠条(17.24%)、荒地(15.00%);饱和含水量平均值由大到小依次为杨树(26.52%)、油松(25.60%)、侧柏(23.50%)、樟子松(22.90%)、柠条(21.37%)、荒地(21.25%).整体上呈现乔木大于灌木,灌木大于荒地的规律.随深度的增加,不同人工林饱和导水率均随土层深度增加显著减小(P<0.05).不同人工林饱和含水量变化趋势不同,其中樟子松、侧柏、杨树、柠条人工林的饱和含水量随深度增加逐渐降低(P<0.05),油松人工林的饱和含水量先增后减,而荒地的饱和含水量基本不受深度影响.对于田间持水量,不同人工林和荒地整体均表现为随土层深度增加而降低的趋势(P<0.05).土壤密度是影响土层0<h≤30 cm 土壤水力特性的主要因素,并且不同土层的土壤水力特性影响因素存在差异.随着土层深度的增加,影响土壤水力特性的因素数量逐渐减少.
To investigate the variation characteristics and influencing factors of soil hydraulic properties under long-term restora-tion(about 40 years)of different vegetation types in the Mu Us Sandy Land of Northern Shaanxi,typical arbor plantations(including Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica,Pinus tabuliformis Carrière,Platycladus orientalis(L.)Franco,and Populus plantations)and shrub plantations(Caragana korshinskii Kom.plantations)were selected as research objects,with waste-land set as the control(CK).By measuring soil hydraulic properties(saturated hydraulic conductivity,field capacity,and saturated water content)in different soil layers(h,0<h≤10 cm,10 cm<h≤20 cm,and 20 cm<h≤30 cm)under various vegetation types,combined with basic soil physical and chemical properties,the response of soil hydraulic properties to long-term restoration of different vegetation types and their influencing factors in this region were revealed.The results showed that the average saturated hydraulic conductivity of different vegetation types in descending order was Populus plan-tation(5.03 cm·h-1),P.orientalis plantation(2.50cm·h-1),P.tabuliformis plantation(1.84 cm·h-1),P.sylvestris var.mongolica plantation(1.79 cm·h-1),C.korshinskii plantation(1.09 cm·h-1),and wasteland(0.64 cm·h-1).The average field capacity in descending order was Populus plantation(23.98%),P.tabuliformis plantation(21.00%),P.orientalis plantation(20.66%),P.sylvestris var.mongolica plantation(19.46%),C.korshinskii plantation(17.24%),and wasteland(15.00%).The average saturated water content in descending order was Populus plantation(26.52%),P.tabuliformis plantation(25.60%),P.orientalis plantation(23.50%),P.sylvestris var.mongolica planta-tion(22.90%),C.korshinskii plantation(21.37%),and wasteland(21.25%).Overall,the soil hydraulic properties of arbor plantations were better than those of shrub plantations,and those of shrub plantations were better than those of waste-land.With the increase of soil depth,the saturated hydraulic conductivity of all plantations decreased significantly(P<0.05).The variation trends of saturated water content differed among plantations:the saturated water content of P.sylves-tris var.mongolica,P.orientalis,Populus,and C.korshinskii plantations decreased gradually with increasing soil depth(P<0.05),that of P.tabuliformis plantation increased first and then decreased,while that of wasteland was basically unaffect-ed by soil depth.For field capacity,all plantations and wasteland showed a decreasing trend with increasing soil depth(P<0.05).Soil bulk density was the main factor affecting soil hydraulic properties in the 0<h≤30 cm soil layer,and the influ-encing factors of soil hydraulic properties varied among different soil layers.The number of factors affecting soil hydraulic properties decreased gradually with increasing soil depth.
高荣;柴红烨;李剑;马雅莉;齐昆;马博;石长春
陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082
农业科技
植被恢复人工林土壤水力特性毛乌素沙地
Vegetation restorationPlantationSoil hydraulic propertiesMu Us Sandy Land
《东北林业大学学报》 2026 (3)
57-64,8
2024年陕西林业科技创新专项(SXLK2024-0202)黄河"几字弯"攻坚战关键技术攻坚项目(办科字[2024]126号).
评论