首页|期刊导航|中国药业|病例组合指数与抗菌药物使用指标相关性分析

病例组合指数与抗菌药物使用指标相关性分析OA

Correlation Analysis Between Case Mix Index and Antibacterial Drug Use Indicators

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨病例组合指数(CMI)与抗菌药物使用指标的相关性及影响因素.方法 回顾性收集医院信息系统(HIS)2023 年全院 49 个临床科室的CMI、抗菌药物使用强度(AUD)、同期出院患者数(N)、抗菌药物累计限定日剂量(DDDs)、CMI×N等相关数据,进行 10 种(线性、对数、倒数、二次、三次、复合、幂、S型、增长、指数模型)曲线拟合,分析相关性;并按AUD是否>40 分为高强度组(>40,n=20)和低强度组(≤40,n=29),以两组临床科室的DDDs、CMI、N、CMI×N.以DDDs、N、CMI和CMI×N为检验变量,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)对AUD>40 进行效能评价,计算各检验变量的曲线下面积(AUC),对差异有统计学意义的指标(P<0.05)计算约登指数得到临界值.结果 CMI×N与DDDs三次模型拟合最优(R²=0.496,P<0.001),CMI与AUD二次和三次模型拟合最优(R²=0.412,P<0.001).两组临床科室的N、CMI和CMI×N比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但高强度组临床科室的DDDs显著高于低强度组(P<0.05).ROC曲线分析显示,DDDs、N、CMI和CMI×N预测AUD>40的AUC分别为 0.793,0.369,0.654,0.486,其中 DDDs的预测效能最优且有统计学意义(P=0.001).根据约登指数确定其最佳临界值为 4 183.13.结论 CMI×N与DDDs、CMI与AUD均呈显著正相关,DDDs的临界值可作为AUD高风险预警,当DDDs>4 183.13 时,发生AUD>40 的风险较高.

Objective To investigate the correlation and influencing factors between case mix index(CMI)and antibacterial drug use indicators.Methods Relevant data including CMI,antibacterial use density(AUD),number of discharged patients during the same period(N),cumulative defined daily doses(DDDs)of antibacterial drugs,and CMI×N of 49 clinical departments in the whole hospital in 2023 were retrospectively collected from the hospital information system(HIS).10 types of curve fitting(linear,logarithmic,reciprocal,quadratic,cubic,compound,power,S-curve,growth and exponential models)were performed to analyze the correlation.According to whether AUD was>40,the departments were divided into the high-intensity group(>40,n=20)and the low-intensity group(≤40,n=29),and the DDDs,CMI,N and CMI×N between the two groups were compared.With DDDs,N,CMI and CMI×N as test variables,the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)was used to evaluate the efficacy of predicting AUD>40,the area under the curve(AUC)of each test variable was calculated,and the cut-off value was obtained by calculating the Youden index for indicators with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Results The cubic model fitting between CMI×N and DDDs was the optimal(R²=0.496,P<0.001),and the quadratic and cubic model fitting between CMI and AUD were the optimal(R²=0.412,P<0.001).There were no statistically significant differences in CMI,N and CMI×N between the two groups(P>0.05),while the DDDs in the high-intensity group was significantly higher than that in the low-intensity group(P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUCs of DDDs,N,CMI and CMI×N for predicting AUD>40 were 0.793,0.369,0.654 and 0.486,respectively,among which,the predictive efficacy of DDDs was optimal,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.001).According to the Youden index,the optimal cut-off value was determined to be 4 183.13.Conclusion There is a significant positive correlation between CMI×N and DDDs,as well as between CMI and AUD.The cut-off value of DDDs can be used as an early warning for high AUD risk.When DDDs>4 183.13,patients have a higher risk of AUD>40.

郦昱琨;李晓强;赵静

新疆维吾尔自治区阿克苏地区第一人民医院,新疆 阿克苏 843000新疆维吾尔自治区阿克苏地区第一人民医院,新疆 阿克苏 843000新疆维吾尔自治区阿克苏地区第一人民医院,新疆 阿克苏 843000

医药卫生

病例组合指数抗菌药物使用强度累计限定日剂量模型拟合

case mix indexantibacterial use densitycumulative defined daily dosesmodel fitting

《中国药业》 2026 (6)

38-42,5

新疆维吾尔自治区阿克苏地区第一人民医院院级科研项目[YJKT2021-24].

10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2026.06.009

评论